“Low income families would be hit hardest if White House and Congress fail to
solve the “fiscal cliff” crisis”!
You won’t see any reference to it in the media certainly, but does anyone on the
planet recall the past 8 years or so when all one heard was how the dastardly
George W. Bush “gave a huge tax cut to the rich”? And, of course, paid for it on
the “backs of the poor and middle class”.
There is likely no better example of how the corrupt news media works tirelessly
to manipulate public opinion to support the liberal left agenda. Almost daily
the media, even in otherwise unrelated stories, would seldom fail to make at
least a passing reference to “Bush’s tax cuts for the rich”.
It has been so pervasive that even when conservatives discuss the deficit or
debt or taxes, they seem to accept the media narrative.
Now, it seems, every report on the “fiscal cliff” hysterically notes that “low
income people would face some of the largest tax increases in percentage terms,
a jump of 55.2percent…” if those tax cuts were eliminated (except for the
highest income earners), according to the Wall street Journal.
“…an average married couple making $20,000 to $30,000 would go from receiving
a $15 refund to paying $1408, DUE IN PART TO LOSS OF THE BUSH-ERA 10 PERCENT
BRACKET AND REDUCTION OF THE CHILD CREDIT”!!!!! (caps mine ) …the Journal
discloses.
Well, who knew!??! Also, incidentally, see that it is now known as the “Bush-ERA
(caps mine)” tax cut…not Bush’s. It just happened during his “era”.
Now, as the GOP caves on the issue of eliminating the “Bush-era” tax cuts only
for millionaires, billionaires, and trillion aires, we’ll see BO praised for
“cutting taxes for the poor and middle class”!
We may even see the beginnings of the clamor for a third term for our DEAR
LEADER!
DLH
