Since When Was the National Guard intended as the Praetorian Guard

 

On Jan. 6th, the biggest cow in the country broke out of the most prominent barn in America.

The next day an order was placed for a new, massive padlock. Directives were issued. Across all fifty states, 25,000 phones rang. “Get your gear, you’re heading for D.C. to provide security for the inauguration.”

Those 25,000 phone calls spawned a million more, as guardsmen notified employers, arranged child-care (pet-care?) and tied up countless other loose-ends. (a deployment causes ripples)

The troops gather at their armories, load up, and upon arrival in their nation’s Capital, they’re greeted by: “We know half of you guys likely voted for Trump, and we need reassurances that one of you psychos won’t do ‘something’ contrary to orders.”

Really?

So you have 25,000 men and women put on an actual show of force against some imagined threat, just two weeks after there was insufficient force available to repel a real, pre-planned riot.

The party’s over, time for the after-action report. What did we learn? 1. It appears that National guardsmen are not traitors (who knew?). 2. Threats to the inauguration were overblown for political purposes.

Hundreds of these troops have now come down with COVID-19. (not unexpected with typical close-quarters military life and an occasional, cold parking garage) It won’t be “reported” as such but realistically, the Biden inauguration is likely the biggest coronavirus “super-spreader” event since the pandemic’s origin.

So here we are, the cow’s running free in some unknown pasture … but look at the new “security system” the barn-owners are enacting.

Watch out, they’re just getting started.

Eugene Mattecheck Jr.

Posted in UNCATEGORIZED | Leave a comment

Kasparov doesn’t get it

  • In life, unlike chess the game continues after checkmate – Isaac Asimov
  • Chess holds its master in its own bonds, shackling the mind and brain so that the inner freedom of the very strongest must suffer – Albert Einstein
  • Chess devotees are really full of themselves – V’PAC

Maybe he spent too much time in the Soviet Union. As the big “expert”on “socialism, Garry Kasparov seems not to see the dishonesty in labeling the clear socialist/communist impulses and drivers of today’s Democratic Party as “moderate”.

In his Wall Street Journal op-ed Friday, Kasparov says that, a) “radicals” have ‘taken over the GOP (?!)’ and that apparently “tried’ to take over the Democratic Party but, b) “Joe Biden defeated them at the ballot box”!!!!

Oh, and “Mr. Trump lost and fairly so. There was no widespread election fraud, or it would have been presented in court.”

Kasparov is either very cynical or he is …daft?           dlh

————————————————————————-

“There is no time for feeble “whataboutism.” Endorsing Trumpist lies and violence in the name of fighting leftist lies and violence is a road to ruin. The left has its share of radicals, but Joe Biden defeated them at the ballot box. They didn’t take over the Democratic Party, as they did the GOP. And you aren’t going to lecture me about the dangers of socialism when I’ve spent my life warning of its failures and terrors.” (Kasparov)

WSJ:

The GOP Hit Rock Bottom. Can Conservatives Recover? 

If reasonable Republicans want to hold off the far left, they will have to stop the rise of the far right.

By Garry Kasparov

“Accepting reality is the most important step back from the brink. Mr. Trump lost, and fairly so. There was no widespread election fraud, or it would have been presented in court. It is anything but patriotic to attack the integrity of U.S. elections and democracy with rumors, anecdotes and pseudostatistics.

“Over the chessboard, I’m a famously sore loser. But I learned that if you don’t accept that you lost, and understand why, you’ll keep on losing.
Trumpism came to Washington promising to burn everything down, and it came close. There is now a chance to build something new and better: a political center


*Evan Esar

Posted in UNCATEGORIZED | Leave a comment

American Greatness article agrees -Let the Senate’s Show Trial Begin

Five days ago we published an article castigating the pathetic nature of Lindsey Grahams importuning of Chuck Schumer not to take up the impeachment articles recently passed in the House.

Impeachment Trial? Let the Dems step in it

Julie Kelly, yesterday,  writing at American Greatness shares our basic view about whether to try the impeachment articles:

Let the Senate’s Show Trial Begin

Joe Biden wants the Senate to “multitask” and conduct an impeachment trial that will include revisiting the 2020 election? Good—let’s roll.

So much for unity.

During her first softball briefing, Jen Psaki, Joe Biden’s press secretary, assured America that the U.S. Senate can “multi-task” by conducting its routine business and proceeding with a trial against former President Donald Trump at the same time. “[Biden’s] gonna leave the mechanics, the timing, the specifics of how Congress moves forward on impeachment to them,” the ex-Obama staffer told a Fox News reporter Wednesday.

The House of Representatives hastily impeached Trump a second time on January 13, one week after the so-called insurrection at the Capitol. The former president was charged with “willfully inciting violence against the Government of the United States” for allegedly provoking the mob with his speech prior to Congress’ formal certification of the 2020 election.

Ten Republican House members, including U.S. Representative Liz Cheney (R-Wyo.), voted for the resolution; Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.), bitter after losing control of the Senate, suggested on the Senate floor last week that Trump did in fact fuel the mob.

To which I say—let the trial begin.

Republican lawmakers and Trump supporters should welcome this opportunity to expose the truth. After all, the former president has been tried in an ex parte court of public outrage and convicted of sedition by the news media, Democrats, and a sizable swath of the American public.
A Proper Defense

Trump and his supporters are denied any defense in the virtual courtroom of social media; tens of thousands of Twitter users, including the former president, were permanently purged from the site following the January 6 melee.

Not only is there a bounty on the heads of people who were involved in the Capitol violence or who even just attended Trump’s speech that day, 74.2 million Americans now are considered “terrorists” for the simple act of voting to reelect the president. Comparisons to Iraqi insurgents or al-Qaeda terrorists easily slip from the tongues of ex-military leaders and alleged “conservative” pundits. Joe Biden mentioned “domestic terrorists” in his inauguration speech.

“Two weeks ago, when an angry violent mob staged an insurrection and desecrated this temple of our democracy, it awakened us,” Senator Amy Klobuchar (D-Minn.) said in the inauguration’s opening remarks Wednesday.

But more than two weeks later, many questions remain unanswered about exactly what happened on January 6. And just like every other overblown crisis intended to inflict mortal damage to Donald Trump, key parts of the narrative are falling apart while others are swept under the rug.

A Senate trial allows for the only public opportunity to vet the various charges now levied against Trump and his voters.

First and foremost, the public needs to know what happened to Brian Sicknick, the Capitol police officer who died on January 7. His cause of death remains unclear, but anti-Trumpers are grotesquely exploiting his passing to add to the January 6 body count, which the public has been told is five people dead. At first, news reports claimed Sicknick was beaten by a Trump thug with a fire extinguisher.

But Sicknick’s family contradicted that narrative a few days later.

“Many details regarding Wednesday’s events and the direct causes of Brian’s injuries remain unknown, and our family asks the public and the press to respect our wishes in not making Brian’s passing a political issue,” the family said in a statement issued January 8.

Top federal law enforcement officials said they are investigating Sicknick’s “passing” not murder. “[We] are looking at everything we can and [it] cuts us to the core that our law enforcement personnel has passed away,” Steven D’Antuono, assistant director for the FBI’s D.C. field office said January 12.

The FBI initially said 37 people were under investigation for Sicknick’s death but later admitted that figure was incorrect. The agency has since offered no update on Sicknick and his name has largely disappeared from the headlines. But identifying who is responsible for Sicknick’s death, if anyone, or clarifying exactly what happened should be a top priority.

Ditto for the killing of Ashli Babbitt, a Trump supporter killed that day. The officer who shot her has not been identified or charged with any crime and the media has lost interest in her death, too. The public also doesn’t have the details of the other three “victims” reportedly killed because of the events that day.

Law enforcement hasn’t caught the man who allegedly planted pipe bombs near the D.C. headquarters of both the Republican National Committee and Democratic National Committee early on January 6. The FBI now is offering a $75,000 reward for information leading to the arrest of the perpetrator.
The Timeline Doesn’t Add Up

The FBI has arrested 110 people for various crimes committed on January 6 but no one has been charged with sedition or insurrection, serious felonies that require more than just the loose assertions of politicians and newspaper columnists to prove. Most of the offenses are property crimes—which were dismissed as no big deal over the summer when Antifa and Black Lives Matter rioters were destroying family businesses in Minneapolis, Portland, and Kenosha—and a few protestors have been charged with assault or “intent to impede government business or official functions.”

Despite more than 200,000 tips, the most wide-ranging investigation in Justice Department history, according to the acting attorney general, has yet to find any evidence of an orchestrated insurrection—just a lot of random troublemakers.

Federal law enforcement also refuses to answer whether Antifa members were present even though news reports and several first-hand accounts confirm Antifa was at least partially involved.

Further—and most importantly as it relates to President Trump—the timeline does not support Democrats’ central accusation that he incited the mob.

Last week, the Washington Post published a detailed timeline of how law enforcement failed to prepare for the January 6 rally and certification vote. “But despite numerous internal briefings, intelligence warnings, and planning meetings, officials failed to take sufficient action to fend off the attacks—with deadly consequences,” the Post reported January 16. The threat of potential violence was ignored and suggestions to add security were denied.

“Trump has not yet taken the stage near the White House, more than a mile and a half away, but a group of 200 to 300 protesters arrive at the Capitol reflecting pool area, near the west side of the building, video captured by a D.C. police camera shows,” the Post article confirmed. Protestors had congregated near the building that morning; while the president was speaking, the trouble began.

By the time Trump ended his speech around 1:15 p.m. local time, barricades were being torn down and police were being overrun outside the Capitol. (It’s about a 40-minute walk from the White House to the Capitol and reports are that cell phone service was spotty, at best, on the National Mall. So it is unlikely that crowds closer to the violence were listening to the speech.) The chaotic scene forced lawmakers into hiding for hours.

But emerging evidence, including Trump’s rally speech—admittedly a fiery stemwinder with plenty of red meat about election fraud—contradicts the accusation that his words fueled the attack. The article of impeachment specifically claimed that “members of the crowd he addressed . . . unlawfully breached and vandalized the Capitol, injured and killed law enforcement personnel, menaced members of Congress . . . and engaged in other violent, deadly, destructive, and seditious acts.” (Emphasis added.) But that seems improbable.

Of course, those loaded, incendiary words are aimed not just at the president but at the tens of thousands who attended his speech and now, by extension, Trump’s 74.2 million voters. Now it’s incumbent upon the accusers—House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) and her House impeachment managers—to prove their case. (McConnell on Thursday sent Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) a timeline to proceed.)

A Senate trial, unfortunately, is now the only way to hold accountable the Democrats and their media mouthpieces for initiating this dangerous path. And it’s the only way to exonerate President Trump and his supporters; the president’s term ended under a cloud of undue shame, lawmakers who pushed for an audit of the election that day are considered traitors even by their colleagues, and regular Americans are being harassed, doxxed, and fired for merely attending the protest even if they committed no crime. Soldiers used as props for Inauguration Day photo ops are fighting back.

Joe Biden wants the Senate to “multitask” and conduct an impeachment trial that will include revisiting the 2020 election? Good—let’s roll.

Posted in UNCATEGORIZED | Leave a comment

Explains a lot: Bush family legacy IS the swamp

Masks — Ironically they were wearing them long before COVD

Maybe some national columnist will look into this

We’ve always had the questions…Now we see the likely answers (I’ve even wondered about Dana Perino and the way she approaches “Bush connections” on FOX)
——————————————————————————————————–

Daily Mail: BUSH CALLED CLYBURN “SAVIOR” FOR BOOSTING BIDEN 

  • ‘You’re the SAVIOR!’ Top Democrat Jim Clyburn reveals what George W. Bush called him for getting Joe Biden nominated
  • House Majority Whip Jim Clyburn bumped elbows and took selfies with George W. Bush at Joe Biden’s inauguration
  • Clyburn revealed on a call to reporters that Bush told him: ‘You know, you’re the savior’ and said only Biden could have beaten Trump
  • ‘If you had not nominated Joe Biden, we would not be having this transfer of power today.’
    Clyburn played critical role in getting Biden the Democratic nomination thanks to primary victory in South Carolina
  • Bush’s spokesman said it was a Biblical reference and that Clyburn ‘helped save Biden’s nomination’

Clyburn revealed on a call to reporters that Bush told him: ‘You know, you’re the savior’ and said only Biden could have beaten Trump”
………….

Bush, who has largely stayed out of politics since leaving the White House, chose ‘none of the above’ in the 2016 presidential election but has not revealed how he voted in 2020.

In a statement issued following Biden’s victory, he wrote, ‘Though we have political differences, I know Joe Biden to be a good man’ and added, ‘I offered him the same thing I offered Presidents Trump and Obama: my prayers for his success, and my pledge to help in any way I can.’

Bush spokesman Freddy Ford downplayed Clyburn’s remarks.

‘Let’s not make this into more than it is,’ he wrote on Twitter, adding that the former president was ‘saying Clyburn helped saved Biden´s nomination … nothing Biblical here.’

Bush had tried to stay out of politics since leaving office, but Trump privately called him a ‘dummy,’ and criticized him for the war in Iraq. Four years ago at inauguration, W. Bush commented ‘That was some weird s**t.’

The hostility was reciprocated: Members of the Bush family were critical of Trump throughout his administration, particularly his younger brother Jeb.

Clyburn’s pivotal endorsement before South Carolina´s Democratic primary seemed to have brought Biden´s candidacy back from the brink following lackluster performances in other early states. It was an awaited signal for many Black voters that Biden would be the candidate to stand up for their interests.

Our question has always been, ‘Why did Trump pick the people he did, who were among his closest advisors’?

Many, like Rex Tillerson, Jim Comey, ” Mad Dog” Mattis, DNI Dir., Dan Coats, and General John Kelly…each one of whom was eventually fired after a fairly public ‘falling out’ of some kind with the President. Then there were some that were not fired but who stepped aside willingly, like Rod Rosenstein, and still others who stayed around and have managed it seems to unobtrusively do damage to Trump…most notably in our view, Chris Wray, FBI Director, and Gina Haspel, CIA Dir. (recommended and supported by…JOHN BRENNAN!!!)

And, William Barr may be another, but a rather special case.

Our theory has always been that, being a ‘non-politician’, and one who had little intimate knowledge of Washington, nor the people who ‘run the place’ (or think they do) , Donald Trump by necessity, and probably by choice, relied on some of the ‘old hands’ he believed knew their way around and could be depended upon to give him advice on who was whom as he chose his key people.

And today’s story provides some insight into the ‘who’ and ‘why’ Trump surrounded himself with people he apparently thought he could trust but instead turned out to be the ‘swampiest’ of the swamp denizens of DC.

Mr. Trump’s administration was filled with “leakers”, administration policy opponents, and covert political enemies…most of whom came from the ranks of his own Party.

Was Trump just very bad at ‘sizing people up’, or in picking people he could trust?

No. We have believed that , being new to the Washington ‘game’, Trump went to the DC veterans to suggest the experienced government and political people he would need to govern.

And now, we believe there is an answer to why his choices have seemed so bad, so often.

Donald Trump had offended the powerful people in his own party with his rough style of political combat. He was regarded as an outsider. The old line ‘professional politicians’ resented a ‘business guy’ moving in on their ‘turf”. If a “non-politician'”could win an election and take over what they’ve owned exclusive ‘rights’ to for decades, if not from the nation’s founding, well. nothing was ‘for sure’.

And, right at the ‘top’ of the political ‘royalty’ were the Bushes, the Clintons, and the various “senior” politicians in Congress.

The Bushes were perhaps the most deeply resentful of Trump: a) he was ‘disrespectful’ in trouncing ‘JEB’, who was ‘in line for the Oval Office gig. He beat Hillary, another who was “in line’, and the wife of GW’s “brother from another mother”.

And how many “Bushies” initially gained key staff jobs in Trump’s administration? How many other Trump selections were based on recommendations from Bush loyalists.

There were many other key people who were not part of the Bush camp but shared their disdain for him. The FBI, for example. Probably as corrupt as any institution in Washington but not necessarily aligned with any Political “dynasty’. They’re in it for themselves; thus a “Comey”…he was a thorn in the side of the Bushes, the Clintons, and most certainly Trump. Other key FBI top people were products of the Obama years but shared with Comey their hate for Trump.

It all has many facets but now the Bush element of the attempted and ultimately successful overthrow of Trump is coming to light.

What about William Barr, for example? We believe the ‘kindly’ ‘Bill’ Barr, a Bush guy way back, may have, most likely we think, been in on the deal. Now that we know how deep the Bush hatred of Trump is, Barr’s role seems more likely, and more obvious. Who suggested to Trump that Barr was the guy for his Attorney General? Doubtful that Trump, himself, knew much about the former Bush AG.

And, is it really necessary to rehash what “good” Barr did for Trump?

A lot of Washington intrigue here, and we neither know the full extent nor have the time to cover it all now.

But the Bush glee, shared with Clyburn over Trump’s deposition, suggests there is a lot yet to be learned…but probably never will be, given the way events since November have unfolded.          dlh

Posted in UNCATEGORIZED | Leave a comment

A sad hand-off, as America enters its dotage

― Alexis de Tocqueville, Democracy in America

“The American Republic will endure until the day Congress discovers that it can bribe the public with the public’s money.”

A ‘Symbolic’ Inauguration.

It is the perfect metaphor for the The Decline of a Great Nation. As deTocqueville theorized…nations have a life cycle…and then they die.

Donald J Trump represents… stands for… the first 200 years of the USA. He leaves as a Great America leaves the world scene…strong, robust, courageous, indefatiguable, aware and faithful to its founding values, grudgingly respected by a secretly grateful world, sadly handed off to a spent, mentally & intellectually challenged shell, weak, destined for final failure, with only memories of the one it replaces…the one it always wanted to be, and now, thinks it was…America is now a nation in its dotage.

God Bless pre-Biden America!         dlh

Posted in UNCATEGORIZED | Leave a comment

Inauguration – all for nothing security other than to “send a message”

CITIZEN MUSCLE

ABUSING CITIZEN SOLDIERS

Washington, D.C., has the nation’s highest ratio of law enforcement officers to residents in the nation for cities over 250,000 people, and…

…it isn’t even close. Yet, last night, 2,000+ National Guard troops present for the inauguration, were sworn in as special deputies.

Democrats and the media were also adamantly against the idea that National Guard troops could act in a law-enforcement capacity when President Trump wanted them to go to the southern border when large caravans were arriving. While some were deployed, they were mostly in supportive and administrative roles

Excellent article. Thoughtful, accurate, and highlights the extraordinary hypocrisy of the Democrat Party, very serious stuff:         dlh

U.S. Marshals Swear-In 2,000 National Guard Troops to Serve as Special Deputies 

Related:

U.S. Marshals Swear-In 2,000 National Guard Troops to Serve as Special Deputies
– The overwhelming presence, with Guardsmen carrying arms and now being deputized, flies in the face of a longstanding and genuine aversion to members of the military being deployed against Americans on American soil. When using National Guard troops was suggested to help quell the rioting and violence in major American cities this past summer, the opposition from Democrats and the media was overwhelming.

Tucker Carlson Reveals What He Thinks Is the Real Reason for the Massive Military Presence in DC

“. . . no matter what they are telling you, those 26,000 federal troops are not there for your safety,” Carlson said on Monday night’s segment of “Tucker Carlson Tonight.”

“Instead, unmistakably, the Democratic Party is using those troops to send the rest of us a message about power: ‘We’re in charge now.’”

Indeed the illigitimate administration is making an effort to purge conservatives from the ranks, make it a Red Guard of sorts, insure that they are Democrat troops:

https://thefederalistpapers.org/us/texas-gov-abbott-blows-stack-fbi-vetting-politics-national-guard-offensive?

Posted in UNCATEGORIZED | Leave a comment

Tomorrows celebrations

-Joey Robinette, aka Biden, will virtually be sworn in as Virtual President of the Virtual United States amid much ‘pimp’ and ceremony:

1) A Mariachi band will play “Aveo El Jefe” as he enters

2) As he is sworn in, the ROOTS will play and Mariah Carey will sing the National Anthem, “Lift Every Voice and Sing”

3) The Oath of Office will be administered by George Soros and Joey will take the oath with his hand on a copy of the Paris Climate accord

4) Ceremonies will conclude with a flyover by the PRC’s ‘lan se tianshi’ (CCP’s ‘Blue Angels’)

5) The virtual ‘electorate’/crowd will be serenaded by the “Margaret Sanger Singers” with their Top Ten recording of “NOT Born in the USA”        dlh

Posted in UNCATEGORIZED | Leave a comment

The purpose of the Capitol incursion

Two of our favorite publications, LifeSite News and Canada Free Press dependably add important perspective commentary and reporting regarding the American scene.  The publications anguish over what is happening to the United States having seen it in Canada.

Set forth in its entirely this lengthy post by Steve Jalsevac offers much concerning insight. The bold emphasis is not to diminish any other insight but to summarize the reasoning of our previous report regarding impeachment of Trump.  There is no case. But it adds a chilling insight that astoundingly had not dawned on this writer.  The timing of the incursion into the Capitol building was  to prevent testimony and to co-opt any reporting of anything that did get said regarding the reasons for delaying Electoral College counting or denying fraudulent counts in some states.

Letter by senior US military raises questions about who is really committing ‘sedition and insurrection’

Joe Biden has given strong indications that he will ‘with speed’ give the United States of America over to the Great Reset of the World Economic Forum

January 18, 2021 (LifeSiteNews) — The Jan. 12 letter from the Joint Chiefs of staff of the U.S. military to all U.S. service members after last week’s Capital riot, warning them against “sedition and insurrection,” must have caused most loyal Americans to question who the military should really be focusing their attention on during this time of grave crisis for the United States.

The Joint Chiefs are aware that a majority of US military service members admire President Trump for all that he has done for them and for the nation over the past four years to protect the United States from both internal and external threats to the nation. On December 12, Navy and Army cadets greeted President Trump with roaring cheers and chants of “USA! USA!”” as he came out into the stadium at West Point for the 121st annual Army-Navy football game. There was obviously overwhelming support from the assembled military recruits for Trump.

The generals are aware that Trump has been the president who finally woke up the nation to the threat that Communist China has been to the US and the world for decades while all past presidents ignored that alarming situation and even facilitated the growth of the power and influence of the CCP that has become by far the greatest military and economic threat to the United States.

Trump greatly reduced the number of violent criminals, illicit drug suppliers, Islamist and political radicals and other questionable persons who were blithely allowed to come into the US by previous Democrat and Republican administrations through his tightening up of immigration policies and building the southern border wall which has led to a dramatic drop in illegal incursions into the country.

They are also well aware that civil authorities in many states were severely negligent for not taking the strong actions required to stop the devastating violent riots that were allowed to carry on across the nation throughout the summer and caused over a billion dollars of property damage in mostly poorer neighborhoods, thousands of injuries to police officers and civilians and 35 deaths.

In most cases, police had their hands tied by their civic leaders and, incredibly,  Nancy Pelosi, many other Democrats and the mainstream media, constantly downplayed the violence as being “mostly peaceful”.  Pelosi actually excused the violence when she stated in response to a question about it, “Oh, people will do what they do.”

The violence took place overwhelmingly in Democrat states whose political leaders refused to charge, convict and imprison most of the rioters who were repeatedly let go or given bail money so they could continue their terror. Law enforcement resources were actually decreased in response to leftist terrorists’ demands to “defund the police”.

In most cases Democrat governors refused to call in their National Guard to put down the riots that were far beyond the abilities of local police to control. That resulted in hundreds, possibly thousands, of police quitting their jobs because of the constant criticism and lack of support for their dangerous tasks from their civic leaders.

Trump repeatedly urged the governors and mayors of those states to do their jobs to protect the constitutional rights of their citizens and exercise their constitutional duties in this respect.

Most ignored the president’s pleas that were made in response to desperate communications from citizens asking the president to do something to help stop what appeared to be a national revolution to destroy America and replace it with a Communist, or otherwise leftist, violent dictatorship, or just plain anarchy. The violence only stopped as the election was approaching, and it became obvious that the violence was harming Democrat chances of victory at the polls.

As for the Capital riot that the Joint Chiefs referred to in their letter, video and other evidence is now available proving what most of the entirely peaceful participants in the Washington Stop the Steal rally suspected. Antifa/BLM types and possibly also some far-right agitators who cannot be considered genuine Trump supporters, initiated the incursions into the Capital, violence against Capital police and property damage well before Trump had even finished his speech a 45-minute walking distance from the captial building.

The timing of when the rioting started makes it clearly impossible that Trump could have “incited” the violence, as the Democrats, the media and even some Republicans are accusing him of doing. And of course, the text of his speech contains nothing that would have “incited” what took place at the Capital and was obviously planned well before Jan. 6.

What took place there was clearly intended to derail the joint session from hearing the speeches from over 100 Members of Congress and a dozen Senators who intended to ask for further examination of all the evidence of unconstitutional election fraud that took place during the November election.

It has now also become obvious that another intent of the rioting was to give a revolutionary pretext to remove the constitutional rights of freedom of speech, due process and many other rights and freedoms from all those who sincerely believed there was election fraud and/or any who are Trump supporters or conservatives. This was a many days pre-planned, well-coordinated action by professional leftist rioters.

This astoundingly rapid removal of constitutional rights and mass suppression of freedom of speech, that is still carrying on, presents a great danger to the Constitutional Republic nature of the United States.

All of the federal law enforcement agencies that have been missing in action for the past several months as the nation has been under assault from Communist and other leftist agencies, somehow seem to have been complicit in what went on during the summer and also complicit in the purge of patriots that is being allowed to carry on at this time in violation of many constitutional principles.

The current situation appears to be one of a complete suspension of the Constitution to permit what is essentially mob rule by leftist agitators and their Democrat, media and numerous leftist corporate allies.

Individuals, organizations and companies, such as Parler and many other free speech alternatives, are being accused, judged and convicted without any due process. 20 years ago or less, most of the actions being taken against conservatives at this time would have been subjected to swift legal condemnation, lawsuits and charges of illicit, discriminatory actions.

The Joint Chiefs’ Greatest concern should be this

In their letter, the Joint Chiefs stated the following:

The American people have trusted the Armed Forces of the United States to protect them and our Constitution for almost 250 years. As we have done throughout our history, the U.S. military will obey lawful orders from civilian leadership, support civil authorities to protect lives and property, ensure public safety in accordance with the law, and remain fully committed to protecting and defending the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic?

We witnessed actions inside the Capital building that were inconsistent with the rule of law. The rights and freedoms of speech and assembly do not give anyone the right to resort to violence, sedition and insurrection..

…..

We support and defend the Constitution. Any action to disrupt the Constitutional process is not only against our traditions, values and oath; it is against the law.

I have explained above many very serious violations of the Constitution that have been taking place this year and which are going on right now. In addition, I should add that we are seeing a form of corporate governance of the nation taking place as the big tech giants and many other large corporations are implementing punishing unconstitutional restrictions on large numbers of elected officials and citizens related to either their political or social views or in response to health authority requests to supposedly lessen the spread of the Wuhan virus.

This has been developing into a major tyranny against the American public and totally violates constitutional protections, which courts at all levels are permitting to continue in violation of their responsibility to defend the American public against such lawlessness.

However, if the Joint Chiefs truly mean what they say in their letter then they should above all be deeply concerned about what a “President Biden” and his Democrat Party have promised to do once they are in control of the government.

Joe Biden has given strong indications that he will “with speed” give the United States of America over to the Great Reset of the World Economic Forum. See the list of related articles at the end of this article that explain many aspects of the Great Reset world revolution. This is an extremely serious promise by Biden that poses the greatest threat imagineable to America and the rest of world society.

Among may other things, the Great Reset will destroy capitalism and will also end the concept of self-governing sovereign nations with leaders elected by the people to serve the people.

It is no exaggeration to warn that if Biden is permitted to do this, he will destroy the Constitutional government and sovereignty of the United States and place all American citizens, companies and organizations, and eventually all government entities, including the US military, under the tyrannical authority and control of powerful, evil, anti-American, anti-freedom globalist elites.

This Great Reset also depends on the forced vaccination of the entire world’s population with poorly tested vaccines of a totally new type that actually do not prevent viral spread and require yearly vaccinations, forced masking and social distancing to continue “forever” after vaccination. We are being warned now that this “vaccine” cannot really be called a vaccine because it does not meet the definition of a real vaccine.

It is still unclear what is really in the vaccine, what it really does to the human body and we are seeing numerous deaths and other dangerous reactions to the “vaccine”. There are warnings from credible scientists and others that the vaccine may permanently change the DNA of recipients and that it may contain human sterilizing agents because of an item that is including in the vaccines that is known to negatively affect fertility.

Proof of vaccination is already being required by various airlines in order to board their planes and increasing numbers of corporations and institutions are requiring employees or users of their services to be vaccinated with this false and dangerous “vaccine”.  

All of this is being demanded while simple, very effective and long available treatment and preventative medications for the Wuhan virus are being suppressed and massive disinformation campaigns about the safety and effectiveness of these proven-in-practice medications are constantly being generated.

This is obviously happening to convince the public that the “vaccine” is the only solution to the virus. In reality, there is no real need for these Covid vaccines. Hundreds of physicians who have been using the medications that effectively treat the virus insist that herd immunity and the end of the pandemic could have been achieved months ago if these medication were not prohibited from being used.

These manipulators are responsible for hundreds of thousands of deaths from the virus that could have easily been prevented.

Compentent, leading physicians and scientists and elected officials who criticize government lockdowns and other devastating, ineffective measures to contain the virus are suffering retribution of various types, including loss of jobs and harsh denunciations from health and other authorities with a totalitarian mindset.

The virus has been weaponized for political purposes to force massive social and political change, totally disregarding the catastrophic impact of these bad decisions on the entire nation.

I bring the virus, vaccine and proof of vaccination into this article because it is a genuine matter of national security and poses a major threat to the economic and social well-being of the nation that is being orchestrated by persons and groups related to the Great Reset revolution.

Americans should all be terrified by the prospect of what the Democrats have openly stated that they will be doing regarding the Great Reset.

How can any U.S. military leaders genuinely concerned about obeying lawful orders from civilian leadership, supporting civil authorities to protect lives and property, ensuring public safety in accordance with the law, and remaining fully committed to protecting and defending the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic, not see that a Biden administration presents the greatest threat to the United States in its history?

The Great Reset will eventually, in the not-too-distant future, transform the mighty U.S. military into an instrument to impose tyranny on the world – or – it will lead to the rapid dissolution of the U.S. military that began under the previous Obama administration which had Joe Biden as its vice-president.

And let us not forget the close ties of Joe Biden, his son Hunter and his entire family, with the Chinese Communist Party.

If the Joint Chiefs of staff are sincere about the letter that they wrote to military personnel, should they not possibly above all be required to protect Americans from an administration that is obviously determined to quickly destroy their nation?

It is curious to note that Catholic Church and political leftists played a large role in installing Jorge Bergoglio, an admirer of Joe Biden and Barak Obama, into the papacy of the Catholic Church. Since ascending into that role Borgoglio, under the name of Pope Francis, has undertaken many actions that have caused enormous damage to not only the Church in general, but also to the papacy itself. Pope Francis is also a supporter of the Great Reset.

I believe that Joe Biden is not remotely his own master, and given what he has promised to quickly implement once he is in the most powerful political office in the world, his top priority will be to cripple and destroy the influence and power of the United States, because the U.S. is the only obstacle in the way of implementing the Great Reset slavery of the world’s population and its determination to greatly decrease world population for the benefit of “Mother Earth.”

Will the U.S. military actually go along with this and facilitate the demise of its own existence, the end of U.S. constitutional government and the end of the United States as a sovereign nation?

I am just asking the obvious questions. I have no answers.

Posted in UNCATEGORIZED | Leave a comment

FIVE PEOPLE DIED AT THE DIRECTION OF DONALD TRUMP WHILE MOB HE INSTIGATED SACKED CAPITOL!!!!!

FIVE DEATHS IN DC RIOT!

Here are some of the articles from ten days or so ago, the theme of which continues today in left dominated press outlets and Mitch McConnell’s pearl-clutching imagination. It has been upped to five after a policeman died we are told by NBC News (2nd to last screen shot) from injuries sustained on duty during altercations inside the Capitol. It could turn out that his death is of the nature of so many COVID deaths, related but more complicated than the sensational assignation, just as two of the sensationalized death numberings were protestors, of age and compromised heath, merely part of the massive crowd. It was an emotional time for them but they were there for a political rally/protest, they were not part of any “Capitol incursion”.

To gin up the death count with these essentially coincidental deaths is calumny. You get several hundred thousand people together  and over the course of the many hours they were there, there will likely be a couple of deaths from natural causes. There were deaths in that time period of DC residents in there homes or hospital.  Should they be attributed to Donald Trump?  The media is even attributing a cop’s contemporaneous suicide to the “Trump rioting”

Such distortion and lies pretty much continues to be the gist of the media reports of the protest (including some conservative media). Such reports supposedly motivates spontaneous outrage toward the President and have elicited (sounds like illicited)   impeachment charges against him. Even many pathetic or cowardly pearl clutching elected Republicans and the now out of the closet apparat have gotten in on the act.

Any honest person who heard or read the Presidents comments on January 6th knows that he exhorted no such thing, indeed just the opposite. The so-called rioting was in no way endemic to the crowd, a couple hundred out of hundreds of thousands, possibly mostly made up of leftist provocateurs, but whoever did it, it was mild compared to the leftist instigated destruction injuries and death during the entire four years of the Trump administration. We are not saying there were not police injured, the result of pushing shoving and possibly directly inflicted on them, but we believe the greatest extent was done by fifth columnists, BLM ANTIFA infiltrators.

The truth is the only death directly attributable to the “riot” “insurrection” was of an unarmed female of no threat who may have been indiscriminately shot by a cop.  By the standard of the left there should be “spontaneous”  rioting , burning, and looting and assaults on police officers across the country by us righties. There won’t be.

Other links of note regarding expected heart attacks in the course of a day:

https://professional.heart.org/en/science-news/heart-disease-and-stroke-statistics-2020-update

Professional Heart Daily publication of The American Heart Association

 

Posted in UNCATEGORIZED | Leave a comment

Impeachment Trial? Let the Dems step in it

  • Graham’s unnecessary start to the letter insults Senators from his own party
  • Issues a letter pleading for business as usual
  • To do what he wanted to do required only the warning that the pursuit was unconstitutional
  • We (me anyway) say let the Dem’s step in it and look like the jackals and hyenas they are
  • They have no case
  • Evidence of Trump’s innocence of “inciting insurrection” is clear — roll tape

Report by Beth Bauman at TownHall, our annotation in red

Graham Has a Suggestion for Schumer So This ‘Disgraceful Saga’ Can Come to an End 

Sen. Lindsey Graham on Sunday penned a letter to Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) on Sunday calling for the article of impeachment against President Donald Trump to be dropped. According to Graham, Schumer’s first act as the chamber’s head should be to shut down the “unconstitutional action” that is being taken.

“Vice President Pence stood in the breach (Editor: oh please Senator, see our comment at end of this ) against unconstitutional calls for him to overturn the 2020 election and violate his oath to defend the Constitution. Mitch McConnell, the Senate’s Majority Leader, likewise rejected those same calls. Virtually all of us rejected further challenges to the 2020 election,” Graham wrote.   (Editor:In other words a rather pathetic ~~ We’ve done your bidding, we capitulated early without hearing the full case, don’t make us uncomfortable, let’s move on)

“But now, in your first act as Majority Leader, rather than begin the national healing that the country so desperately yearns for, you seek vengeance and political retaliation instead. (Editor: why should we be so desperate if they are not?!) While the Vice President and Senate Republicans rejected unconstitutional actions, (Editor: that is your opinion Lindsey but thanks for denigrating your betters at Constitution interpretation – Cruz and Hawley)  you seek to force upon the Senate, what would itself be but one more unconstitutional action in this disgraceful saga – the impeachment trial of a former president.”

Graham pointed to the Constitution, saying Congress’ ability to impeach a president can only be done while he or she is in office.

“The impeachment power exists to protect the Nation from the harm that an incumbent president might inflict upon the Nation were he to remain in office, not to vindicate political grievances after a president has left office,” the letter stated.

While removing a president from office and barring him from running for office again are Congressional powers, those remedies have to take place while the president is in office.

“They are not separate remedies for two different constitutional impeachments, the one for a president who is incumbent in office and the other for a president who is no longer incumbent in office,” the senator stated. “If a Senate trial is not constitutional, then the remedy of disqualification is unavailable to the Congress as a punishment for the unconstitutionally impeached president.”

Graham also stated that the Framers never “intended to empower Congress to disqualify any former officer it would like, whenever it would like, and with no investigation.”

He made the argument that this move can and will set a dangerous precedent.

“Where does this all end? When Republicans in the 115th Congress had control of both chambers, should they have impeached and disqualified President Obama from future office for his handling of Benghazi? Should Democrats now just ‘go ahead’ and disqualify Trump administration officials from future office while they hold both chambers, just because they believe they can?” he asked.

Graham concluded his letter by saying the impeachment of President Trump wouldn’t be about protecting the country and the Constitution. He called on the Senate to dismiss the article of impeachment once it’s received in the chambers.  ( Editor: For crying out loud Graham the constitutional absurdity of it is so clear, indeed it amounts to a Bill of Attainder  let the jerks confirm their idiocy )

Below is the full letter: (Twitter link)

My letter to Democratic Leader Schumer.

The Senate should vote to dismiss the article of impeachment once it is received in the Senate. We will be delaying indefinitely, if not forever, the healing of this great Nation if we do otherwise. pic.twitter.com/fjVcf7iVPf


This writer is fine with the matter moving forward particularly as it delays any other Democrat work and capitulation to same by Graham and others , and exposes Dems and a few RINOs and however it makes Graham and McConnell uncomfortable.

As for Pence — Pence viewed his job as ministerial, a complacent demeanor unbecoming what is at stake. I don’t think the framers wasted time putting ministerial folderal duties in the Constitution. He arguably could have asserted a duty to protect the integrity of the electoral college through his evaluation of the votes or he and Graham and McConnell could have argued for and vigorously pursued recommendations of their Constitutional betters — Harvard Law Cruz’s and or Yale Law Hawley’s proposals.  The SCOTUS may well have decided against them but the presentations and arguments would have been valuable and useful for history. Trump supporters want hearings and opportunities to present evidence denied them in a timely manner and do not demand a particular result.    R Mall

Posted in UNCATEGORIZED | Leave a comment