Exactly what are “Catholic ” institutions for?

  • Apparently it means being everything to everybody for money


This is a Jesuit university American Catholics can take real pride in…THAT IS if you’re anti-American, embarrassed by Catholicism and admire religious racketeering!

The implications are serious, wide and deep — research access (civilian and defense)   propaganda and outright disinformation taught as objective truth, politcal influence.

Via daily Caller News Foundation:  (excerpt) Read the entire article for the astounding extent of the subterfuge and influence peddling. Below this excerpt we remind you of the Georgetown massacre of its religious identity at Obama’s request. *      DLH

FOREIGN MEDDLING: Department Of Education Going After Elite Colleges For Allegedly Taking And Hiding Foreign Cash

  • The Department of Education has launched an investigation into foreign cash secretly flowing into U.S. universities and sent letters to Georgetown University and Texas A&M Thursday.
  • A Senate report found that 70 percent of colleges that took money from a Chinese propaganda program broke the law by not disclosing it.
  • Almost all of the colleges contracted to shape U.S. textbooks on the Middle East received massive funding from countries in the region.

The Department of Education is going after U.S universities over supposed ties to foreign governments, after some allegedly took huge quantities of foreign cash and hid it from regulators.

At the top of the list are Georgetown University and Texas A&M, which have taken hundreds of millions of dollars from the government of Qatar, a middle eastern nation with suspected links to international terrorism.

Both schools received letters from the Department of Education Thursday saying they should have disclosed that funding but their filings “may not fully capture” the activity, the Associated Press reported. The letter warned that they could be referred to the attorney general to “compel compliance.”

Georgetown was also asked about possible ties to Russian cybersecurity firm Kaspersky Lab, as well as Saudi Arabian money. Both schools were ordered to disclose funding from Huawei and ZTE, Chinese firms suspected of spying.

Top Foreign Funders of U.S. Universities, 2011-2016 (Source: Department of Education)
Country Amount
Qatar $1,024,065,043
England $761,586,394
Saudi Arabia $613,608,797
China $426,526,085
Canada $402,535,603
Hong Kong $394,446,859


In February, a Senate investigative subcommittee released a bipartisan, 100-page report that found that not only had China been pouring money into the U.S. for a program linked to propaganda efforts, a huge percentage of U.S. colleges had violated the law by hiding the money.

Since 2006, the Subcommittee determined China directly provided over $158 million in funding to U.S. schools for Confucius Institutes,” the report said. “The Department of Education requires all post-secondary schools to report foreign gifts of $250,000 or more from a single source within a calendar year of receiving them. Despite that legal requirement, nearly 70 percent of U.S. schools that received more than $250,000 from Hanban failed to properly report that amount,” it continued.

Yet the Department of Justice told Senate investigators it had no indication that the Department of Education has ever tried to take U.S. colleges to court for allegedly violating the law.

So-called “Confucius Classrooms” funded by China have grown rapidly even though they were touted as a weapon by China’s former minister of propaganda. Teachers also committed rampant visa fraud, and China blocked the U.S. from creating a reciprocal program in that country, the report said.

During a 2018 congressional hearing on China’s activities in U.S. universities, FBI Director Christopher Wray said “I think the level of naïveté on the part of the academic sector about this creates its own issues.”

In March, security experts said that Chinese hackers had infiltrated a web of U.S. universities and stolen military research from them. “They are a full-fledged operation,” an expert told the Wall Street Journal. “And they are not going anywhere.”   . . .


Georgetown is cooperating with the investigation and “takes seriously its reporting obligations and provides all information as required by the Department of Education every six months,” the school told the Associated Press.

The Daily Caller News Foundation asked the school for information about its foreign funding and how it might give other countries influence over the curriculum several times in recent months, but the school refused to answer.

In Texas, even though information about donors to the public university is supposed to be public, when a lawyer filed a Freedom of Information Act request, Texas A&M refused to turn over the records. Instead, the school alerted Qatar, which hired a politically-connected law firm that took legal action to tie up the request, documents reviewed by the Daily Caller News Foundation show.   . . .

Obama at Georgetown in 09

Obama White House ordered coverup of religious symbols for Georgetown speech  L A Times, APRIL 16, 2009  (excerpt)

Surprising word today that President Barack Obama’s White House asked Georgetown University to cover all religious symbols at the scene of the president’s economic speech at the Roman Catholic institution Wednesday.
And the prestigious Jesuit university agreed. . . .

*We note that this was not an effort on Georgetown’s part at the avoidance of confusion of Obama with Georgetown,  after all he was invited/ accepted, nor avoidance of any scandal over religious symbolism as the next time Obama appeared their Georgetown made no such effort or agreement.  It was pure in the bag toadyism.

Posted in UNCATEGORIZED | Leave a comment

Declassify Russiagate documents now


If ever there was a ‘no-brainer’, it’s this one:

This Justice Dept. and FBI will never turn over information incriminating personnel in either entity.

That’s been proven by the stonewalling, slow-walking, and lying that has been their hallmark in any investigation of their actions in the last administration.

It is ludicrous to expect cooperation from Christopher Wray or any underlings reporting to William Barr (same for those agencies headed by Dan Coats and Gina Haspel, either due to intimidation from their subordinates, or their own participation in the illegal matters under investigation.). This has been proven in past attempts by Congress when led by Republicans.

Chuck Schumer was mistaken. There are more than 6 ways from Sunday that these agencies will protect themselves…this is the 7th!

(We are constantly told that all the wrongdoing by DOJ, National Security, the FBI that went on during the Obama years was confined to just a ‘few people at the top’, “true believers” in the Obama/Hillary way …all other employees of these bureaus and agrencies are “pure as the driven snow”…hard working, committed to justice, blah, blah, and, of course, blah. A question we have is, exactly how far down do those “top levels go?” And who promoted those people occupying top and “semi-top” levels? And who hired over the past 10 years or so the ‘hardworking, committed’ people at the lower levels?)

We could add if anyone recalls, the cell phones of Strzok and Page were ‘mysteriously’ wiped clean!…remember? YOUR FBI, IN PEACE AND WAR!


At Conservative Tree House

23 House Republicans Suspect DOJ Cover-up in Progress? – Request “Prompt” Declassification from President Trump…

Twenty-three House republicans request declassification of documents directly from President Trump as soon as possible. Despite the executive office directive to AG Bill Barr, the republican group seemingly do not trust the DOJ and FBI institutional interests.

It’s a smart move to keep the pressure on.

We could add if anyone recalls, the cell phones of Strzok and Page were ‘mysteriously’ wiped clean!…remember? YOUR FBI, IN PEACE AND WAR!

Posted in UNCATEGORIZED | Leave a comment

The Dershowitz’ decision matrix

  • It won’t be like last year says Alan, no more hanging with the hoi poloi
  • This year he’s back with the Israel blaming Martha crowd
  • However, having done the unmentionable, the bridge back to the Catskills is one too far



Liberal bonds are strong. A drink, some canapés, and ‘stimulating conversation’ with the ‘brightest people in the world’…progressives…are everything, it seems, even to the nation’s most respected elites.

Professor Dershowitz’ late endorsement of “The Democrats’ Biggest Buffoon”, however, may not be enough.

But poor Alan had to make a decision and it had to be an agonizing choice. There was only one among 25 from which to choose…each is a doozie!

The initial winnowing was probably easy. Faculty jealousies and feuds are part of the culture of academia. So fellow Harvard professor, Liz Warren, was likely one of the first to go.

The “Professor” actually doesn’t like communists, so DeBlasio and Bernie and many of the other ‘rose-tinted’ wannabes were easy to jettison.

But how it got down to “good ol’ Joe” is, at first, a real mystery to us.

Why the esteemed Professor Alan Dershowitz would ever want to be associated in any way with this clumsy, arrogant, nasty little man of sub-par intelligence is something to ponder.

Dershowitz could not possibly respect this idiot!

Our guess? Professor Alan Dershowitz, thought to be one of the shrewdest, brightest, observers of the modern political scene, and certainly a progressive to the core, thinks that “Sleepy Joe” Biden has the best chance to beat Donald J. Trump!     DLH

Alan Howitzer Declares He Would Support Biden Over Trump in 2020
By Aidan McLaughlin Jun 13th, 2019,

Alan Dershowitz, the Harvard Law professor emeritus renowned, as of late, for his legal defenses of President Donald Trump throughout the special counsel investigation, said Thursday that he would support Joe Biden in 2020 in a matchup with the current president.

Dershowitz, appearing on the SiriusXM radio show of Mediaite founder Dan Abrams, spoke at length about the investigation into Trump and his campaign’s ties

to Russia, and said he will vote in 2020 based on the entirety of Trump’s record.

“You’re not going to vote for Donald Trump, are you?” Abrams asked in response.
“It depends who runs against him,” Dershowitz said. “If Bernie Sanders is nominated, that would present a real dilemma for me. I don’t think under any circumstances I could vote for a man who went to England and campaigned for a bigot and anti-Semite like Jeremy Corbin. I don’t think I could do it, I couldn’t pull that lever.”

“And what if the candidate is Joe Biden?” Abrams asked.

“I’m a strong supporter of Joe Biden,” Dershowitz said. “I like Joe Biden. I’ve liked him for a long time and I could enthusiastically support Joe Biden.”

“Over Donald Trump?” Abrams asked.

“Over Donald Trump, yeah,” the law prof said.

Remembering about this time last year:

Alan Dershowitz Says He’s Shunned by liberals on Martha’s Vineyard for Defending Trump   By Niraj Chokshi , NY Times  July 3, 2018

It was not the sort of complaint likely to draw public sympathy, and it did not.

Alan Dershowitz, the lawyer and professor emeritus at Harvard Law School, argued in an op-ed last week for The Hill that Americans have grown increasingly intolerant of opposing political views, focusing on a call by Representative Maxine Waters to harass Trump administration officials wherever they go.

But it was a personal note in the column that soon grabbed attention.

“I never thought I would see McCarthyism come to Martha’s Vineyard, but I have,” he wrote, of the elite island enclave off Cape Cod where he is a fixture.

Mr. Dershowitz, a self-professed “liberal Democrat,” said that friends on the Vineyard had snubbed him for publicly arguing against impeaching President Trump on television talk shows and in a forthcoming book.

“For them, it is enough that what I have said about the Constitution might help Trump,” said the lawyer, known for his fierce advocacy for civil liberties and his defense of famous clients like O.J. Simpson and Claus von Bulow. “So they are shunning me and trying to ban me from their social life on Martha’s Vineyard.”

This claim only seemed to draw a wave of mockery online that crested just as many of the nation’s media and political elites headed to the Cape for the Fourth of July.
“It is outrageous that people are now shunning Alan Dershowitz in their social lives,” one Twitter user wrote. “Really, what the heck took so long?

Many rejected the comparison to McCarthyism, with its blacklists and smears that ruined careers. Countless people offered Mr. Dershowitz their thoughts and prayers. One enterprising troll even set up a crowdfunding campaign with a $5 million goal to “buy Alan some new friends.” But friends and acquaintances on the Vineyard confirmed that his outspoken defenses of President Trump had not been well received.

His name and the name of the resort were both trending on social media. There were jokes about fine “Vineyard whine.”


Posted in UNCATEGORIZED | Leave a comment

Pope Francis is auditioning for a new job; czar of the ‘means of production’; hmm, sound familiar?

  • Pope Francis tells top energy executives to act now AND REPENT
  • And by golly, Il Papa means it!
  • He might as well be named Pope Fidel, his advocacy is nothing short of one-world-government Marxism
  • Marx wished he had dreamed up climate change — what a tool for getting the masses on board!
  • And he never had such world-wide useful idiots in leadership positions
  • Pope F seems to have signed on to AOC’s twelve years doomsday scenario.
  • AOC may be too optimistic by the Pope’s lights
  • Two things are predictable about the weather: Change and that Pope F’s response to what in scientific reality is an overwhelmingly natural phenomenon will kill many people, because of the economics, the politics and the psychosis of it


Pope backs carbon pricing to stem global warming and appeals to deniers
by Philip Pullella at Reuters

VATICAN CITY, June 14 (Reuters) – Pope Francis said on Friday that carbon pricing is “essential” to stem global warming – his clearest statement yet in support of penalising polluters – and appealed to climate change deniers to listen to science.
In an address to energy executives at the end of a two-day meeting, he also called for “open, transparent, science-based and standardised” reporting of climate risk and a “radical energy transition” away from carbon to save the planet.
Carbon pricing, via taxes or emissions trading schemes, is used by many governments to make energy consumers pay for the costs of using the fossil fuels that contribute to global warming, and to spur investment in low-carbon technology.

The Vatican said attendees of the closed-door meeting at its Academy of Sciences, a follow-up to one a year ago, included the CEOs of Royal Dutch Shell, Eni, BP, Repsol, Conoco Phillips, Chevron, ExxonMobil, and executives of investment funds.
“Collectively, these leaders will influence the planet’s future, perhaps more than any in the world,” said Father John Jenkins, president of the U.S. University of Notre Dame, which organised the meeting.

A small group of demonstrators gathered outside a Vatican gate. One held a sign reading “Dear Oil CEOs – Think of Your Children”.

Francis, who has made many calls for environmental protection and has clashed over climate change with leaders such as U.S. President Donald Trump, said the ecological crisis “threatens the very future of the human family”.

He criticised those who, like Trump, doubt the science that shows human activity is causing the earth to heat up.

“For too long we have collectively failed to listen to the fruits of scientific analysis, and doomsday predictions can no longer be met with irony or disdain,” Francis said. Discussion of climate change and energy transition must be rooted in “the best scientific research available today”.

Trump, asked in an interview if he accepted climate science, said last week: “I believe there’s a change in weather, and I think it changes both ways.”
He has said the United States will withdraw from the Paris accord, a 2016 global agreement to fight climate change.

Francis, who wrote an encyclical – a significant document on Church teaching – in 2015 on protection of the environment, and strongly supports the Paris accord, said time was running out to meet its goals.

“Faced with a climate emergency, we must take action accordingly, in order to avoid perpetrating a brutal act of injustice towards the poor and future generations,” he said.

“We do not have the luxury of waiting for others to step forward, or of prioritising short-term economic benefits.”

Oil companies have come under growing pressure from investors and activists to meet the Paris goals.

Companies including Royal Dutch Shell, BP and Total have laid out plans to expand their renewable energy business and reduce emissions. Critics say such gestures are minor parts of businesses that overwhelmingly depend on an economy that continues to pollute.

BP Chief Executive Bob Dudley said after the meeting that “the world needs to take urgent action to get us on a more sustainable path and it is critical that everyone plays their part – companies and investors, governments and individuals”. (Additional reporting by Ron Bousso in London and Steve Jewkes in Milan; Editing by Catherine Evans, Kevin Liffey, Raissa Kasolowsky and Peter Graff)

Posted in UNCATEGORIZED | Leave a comment

Stop the Congressional Bullying


The Odious Elijah Cummings’ House Oversight Committee Votes To Hold Barr And Ross In Contempt

Cummings, undoubtedly, in our opinion, one of the most detestable people in Congress, and that’s saying a lot, is demanding the AG and Commerce secretary hand over documents related to the addition of the citizenship question on next year’s census.

Trump: “I think it’s totally ridiculous we would have a census without asking” about citizenship.


We admittedly agree with President Trump on a lot of things. But this one, in our opinion, is a real ‘no brainer’.

What’s the purpose of a census if not to determine the number of people residing in a country and what percentage of them are actually citizens?


A NOTE TO READERS: The comments which often accompany the aggregated news reports you see on Veritaspac reflect the opinion of the editors. The purpose intended for this site is to promote discussion among our readers who represent a wide variety of experiences and a  valuable source of expert knowledge of politics, government, law, military, national security, and  various other related topics, far greater than that of your editors. Consequently we believe that your input, your opinions would be of great interest and value to all of our readers. If you wish, your identity and always your email address will be confidential. We urge you to give us your opinion on the matter discussed here as well as any other post appearing on V’pac.                                                                                                                                        **************************************************************************

Why Rep. Cummings believes it is necessary for his committee to see the documents related to discussions within the Executive branch regarding the addition of the citizenship question is pretty obvious to anyone paying attention to the partisan atmosphere in Washington these days.

Cummings and his Democratic colleagues hope to find, maybe, a sentence or two in the documents that they could use to distort or misrepresent, that would give an impression, however inaccurate, that there was some politically mischievous reason for asking a person living in the US if they are a citizen.

That’s simply how the Democrats in Congress ‘roll’ these days…and Cummings is as sleazy at that game as anybody in Washington.

Now the Democrats “official” opposition to asking about citizenship in the census is no secret, nor any mystery. Their calculus has always been that the more illegal aliens that can be brought into the US, the more Democrat voters there will be. As we’ve seen, the “migrants” of today, generally, are far different than those immigrants who came before…seeking only opportunity to earn a better life, willing to accept the values, the culture of their new home, to learn the language, and to assimilate as Americans, in every way.

Many of today’s migrants are seeking not just an opportunity to earn a better life, but to be awarded a better life and to be given all the benefits and privileges of our nation’s citizens by just crossing our border illegally! Many have no intention of ‘assimilating’, of accepting the laws and culture of this nation. They intend to come here, settle into their own enclaves…they even bring the flags of their own country…live as they did in the countries they came from, countries they claimed were ‘oppressive’, ‘dangerous’, ‘inhumane’, poorly governed’…you name it. Then here, they make demands on this country for the benefits of citizenship they desire, and elect the people who bought their votes!

And the Democrats are anxious to meet their demands… in return !

The way the Democrats frame their opposition to determining who is a citizen and who is not is  as disingenuous as their rationales usually are, is that “it would intimidate people who aren’t citizens or those who live with people who aren’t citizens, from responding, bringing a distorted allocation of federal resources and congressional representation to areas with higher minority concentrations.”

THAT IS HOW THE WALL STREET JOURNAL DESCRIBES THE POSITION OF OPPONENTS OF THE CITIZENSHIP QUESTION. When they say it would ‘bring a distorted allocation (of resources and representation) to areas with higher minority concentrations’, they mean that fewer congressional seats that Democrats hoped to fill and the added benefits and subsidies that would go to illegal aliens, would not be available.

We ask, why should these things be available? There is nothing inhumane about denying the benefits of citizenship to people who came here in deliberate violation of our laws, bypassing even minimum regulations, even if their claims of refugee status were valid (which many are not).

America is a generous nation. Its citizens, however, have the right to the opportunities and benefits of their status as citizens, just as the people of any sovereign nation do to theirs.

It is thus also the right of a nation to know who is in their country and whether they are here as citizens.

What’s your opinion?

Posted in UNCATEGORIZED | Leave a comment

Plugs Biden: the tragicomedy of ingrown hair

Having Striven Mightily the Army of Democratic Candidates Have Finally Achieved The Ultimate…Absolute Parody!

Entering the race late has put Joe Biden at a definite disadvantage. But, look, this is Good Ol’ Joe Biden (spelled with a red “E”). Haven’t we learned? You don’t mess with Ol’ Joe!

While all the other candidates had already gotten their promises out to the voters…all the stuff each will do if you just elect them in ’20…free college, free healthcare, free abortion, all your debts forgiven, everlasting peace in the world, a carbon free galaxy, Stacy Abrams a Vice President… what’s left?

Even dedicated communists were aghast. Even the Great Helmsman, Mao, never went so far with his promises. Chairman Josef (Stalin) would have laughed at the promises of this year’s Democrat field…they make utopia look like hell on earth by comparison!

So what does Joe promise. You read it here in Veritaspac…Joe vows to Cure Cancer!

This must be it, The Political Laffer of All Time!

Joe Did it !

He exposed the Democratic party’s 2020 presidential campaign for what it is…The Greatest Self Parody in National Politics in History!

Hurry, Hurry, Get your tickets here…see the Six Feet Tall Man Eating Chicken!


Posted in UNCATEGORIZED | Leave a comment

Theory that ignores human nature and nation states

So we have with the estimable Veronique de Rugy writing at Townhall today.

It is a fine statement of free trade mantra that tariffs are taxes. We believe in low taxes don’t you? She castigates Trump for “raising tariffs” (taxes) and preventing other countries from subsidizing American consumers. As if they are incapable of playing more than one game at a time or using subsidies of their industries as an economic weapon.

If you corporally discipline a child is the only result that you hurt your hand? If you withhold a treat as punishment is the result more Twinkies for you (OK maybe on that) But does either also have the effect of changing behavior for the betterment of the household and the child in later life?

Read Ms de Rugy’s column and tell us what you think as big-picture conservatives. Our response to the article is set forth below the link to hers but definitely read hers. Critique ours.

Will the Real Tariff Man Please Stand Down? 

On what planet is /was this true? (de Rugy statement in italics)

“Leaving aside for now the fact that this has failed repeatedly as a 
strategy to force countries into making concessions they weren’t willing
to make in the first place,”

Robbery of intellectual property is a tax on American innovation. Destroying American industries is a tax on American independence and job creation. Zero tariffs may be ideal and Trump has stood up for that, but that is a process and China and Mexico and others are not actually believers, yet.

The article tries to assume a mantel of economic sophistication but economics is supposed to be about the real world and the glib pronouncement of theory is not the complete real world. Agricultural commodities are to a great extent fungible today. As China puts a tariff on US farm goods, what countries are going to make it up at a consistent lower price? And where are the countries that were buying from those countries now selling to China going to get their goods and at what price now bid up by China? If China can be shipped to profitably then so can virtually any other country. And the market stabilizes or grows with population requirements.

It is fine for America to preach “the way” and enter into agreements with fellow believers. It is another to be a patsy, particularly for China which has a whole different world view.

Posted in UNCATEGORIZED | Leave a comment

Dem Candidates Make New Promises


Joe Biden told an audience in Ottumwa, Iowa on June 11 that his White House would “cure” cancer should he beat President Trump in 2020.

“I’ve worked so hard in my career, that I promise you, if I’m elected president you’re gonna see the single most important thing that changes America, we’re gonna cure cancer…”

Wow! Think of the pressure that puts on Spartacus!:

Booker Announces his administration Will Cure Erectile Dysfunction

And how about Kirsten Gillibrand? She’ll have to purge the nation of all ‘pro-life racists’ (“It’s not acceptable to oppose abortion…it’s “racist”!); who knows how far she’ll have to go with that? Are there enough pro-infanticide-dists to pull that off ?

And Kamala?

Well, she’s already promised to ‘order’ her DOJ to prosecute Trump for “obstruction” (I believe they would have no choice…”); BUT NOW, in light of Biden’s announcement, Harris has announced that her administration will also cure Peyronie’s Disease (bent penis); She immediately received a tweet of gratitude from Willie Brown AND an offer of a supportive testimonial from victim Bill Clinton.  Monica Lewinski could not be reached for comment but is expected to give succor to the cause.

Posted in UNCATEGORIZED | Leave a comment


OOH NOO! SAY IT AIN’T SO!    From Breitbart:

Top Execs of 180 Companies: Abortion Necessary to Be Successful in Business 


And another 177 companies of equal or greater (?) stature…it could destroy the economy…ABORTION FOREVER!

Reading further:

The top executives of more than 180 companies have signed a letter that says abortion is essential in order for people to be successful in their businesses.

“When everyone is empowered to succeed, our companies, our communities and our economy are better for it,” the executives say in the letter posted on a newly launched website titled “Don’t Ban Equality.”

A few of the major companies attesting to the importance of abortion to corporate America:

Fur — Laura Schubert

LaRue PR LLC  — Jessy Klein Fofana

Lesbians Who Tech — Leanne Pittsford

Nia Impact Capital  — Kristin Hull

We Dream in Color —  Jade Gedeon

The Cru — Tiffany Dufu

Harrington Investments, Inc.  John Harrington

Dazey LA — Dani Nagel

Gotham Gal  — Joanne Wilson

Union Station  — Corie Hardee

New York Media  — Pam Wasserstein

Le Tote  —  Rakesh Tondon

Aspiration —  Andrei Cherny

Sunshine Sachs  —  Shawn Sachs

BerlinRosen  —  Jonathan Rosen & Valerie Berlin

Swift  —  Liz Valentine

Tammy Gordon  — Verified Strategy

Help Scout  —  Nick Francis

Sawyer  —  Marissa Alden

General Assembly  –  Jake Schwartz

Kona Natural Soap Co LLC  — Marty Corrigan

LOOM — Erica Chidi Cohen

And some outfit called Heartbeat — ironic name  to hold out in support of abortion, the goal of which is to end heartbeats

Of the full list we have heard of about  four of them, and they are the usual suspects that sign onto everything leftist –  Ben & Jerries — what leftist cause are they not on board with??   Talk about shooting yourself in the foot– offend current customers for a cause intent on limiting your future customers. Brilliant bunch of MBA’s no doubt — Boston U alums??

Posted in UNCATEGORIZED | Leave a comment

AOC & Waters on the case!


Now you understand, it’s just a rumor. But because it’s the Democrats and especially Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, you gotta give it some credence, right?

In the aftermath of Chairman Nadler’s many and various subpoenas, Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez is calling for her party’s leadership to require testimony from whom she believes is the “most mysterious Russian” involved in the entire collusion/obstruction investigation and “has been repeatedly mentioned in press accounts”.

AOC, the Boston University trained economics expert, has been joined in her demand by another highly influential Democrat, Maxine Waters.

In a joint statement, Ocasio-Cortez and Waters are demanding that Congress require testimony from “Mr. Ollie Gark”!

At the press conference announcing their demand, several reporters asked if they were referring to the “oligarchs” on whom Putin supposedly relies on to maintain his hold on power?

Both Ocasio-Cortez and Waters simultaneously responded, “YES! That’s him !” (Remember where you heard it first)        DLH

Posted in UNCATEGORIZED | 1 Comment