“Neville” Kerry Has Achieved Peace In Our Time!
Iran To Surely Honor Agreement!
Included in the deal for Iran to “freeze” its nuclear weapon development is a secret provision that if, in the next six months, it fails to abide by the agreement Iran must adopt Obamacare. . . . . . Following announcement of the agreement in Teheran, Ayotollah Khameini ordered the beheading of recently elected President Rouhani who allegedly agreed to the terms. DLH
or maybe not
John Bolton has much to say regarding the “interim” arrangement over Iran’s nuclear weapons program. Read more about it here.
This interim agreement is badly skewed from America’s perspective. Iran retains its full capacity to enrich uranium, thus abandoning a decade of Western insistence and Security Council resolutions that Iran stop all uranium-enrichment activities. Allowing Iran to continue enriching, . . . lays the predicate for Iran fully enjoying its “right” to enrichment in any “final” agreement. . . . This is not, as the Obama administration leaked before the deal became public, a “compromise” on Iran’s claimed “right” to enrichment. This is abject surrender by the United States.
In exchange for superficial concessions, Iran achieved three critical breakthroughs. First, it bought time to continue all aspects of its nuclear-weapons program the agreement does not cover (centrifuge manufacturing and testing; weaponization research and fabrication; and its entire ballistic missile program). . . .
Second, Iran has gained legitimacy. This central banker of international terrorism and flagrant nuclear proliferator is once again part of the international club. . .
Third, Iran has broken the psychological momentum and effect of the international economic sanctions.
Most importantly, the deal leaves the basic strategic realities unchanged. Iran’s nuclear program was, from its inception, a weapons program, and it remains one today. Even modest constraints, easily and rapidly reversible, do not change that fundamental political and operational reality. And while some already-known aspects of Iran’s nuclear program are returned to enhanced scrutiny, the undeclared and likely unknown military work will continue to expand, thus recalling the drunk looking for his lost car keys under the street lamp because of the better lighting.
Bolton has much more to say about the implications of the deal and the limited options available to critics of the deal. He also indicates what he believes Israel’s option is . . . a military strike to prevent “Tehran’s otherwise inevitable march to nuclear weapons.”
R Mall
