Yep she said that:
Loretta Lynch Vows to Prosecute Those Who Use ‘Anti-Muslim’ Speech That ‘Edges Toward Violence’
“Speaking to the audience at the Muslim Advocate’s 10th anniversary dinner Thursday, Lynch said her “greatest fear” is the “incredibly disturbing rise of anti-Muslim rhetoric” in America and vowed to prosecute any guilty of what she deemed violence-inspiring speech.”
Her “greatest fear” and her greatest threat: She will prosecute anyone she deems to make “violence-inspiring speech”. This should chill the blood of every freedom-loving American. You might be making Loretta interpreted “violence-inspiring speech” and not even know it! As Rush mentioned today, can you imagine her threatening to prosecute anti-Christian rhetoric?
From the James Barrett / Daily Wire article linked to above:
It is painfully clear that, like her predecessor Eric Holder, Lynch is far more concerned with promoting the social justice agenda than protecting the Constitutional rights of American citizens. What exactly is speech that “edges toward violence”? What exactly are “actions predicated on violent talk”? In the end, it is whatever she decides it to mean.
Yep she said this too:
Loretta Lynch, addressing the massacre in San Bernardino by Islamic Jihadis:
“We’re at the point where these issues have come together really like never before in law enforcement thought and in our nation’s history and it gives us a wonderful opportunity and a wonderful moment to really make significant change,” said
Lynch.
How about that folks? 14 dead, more than a score wounded, clear evidence that Islamic terrorism is now within our borders…It’s a “wonderful moment”!!!
(Oh, and what kind of “significant ‘change’ you think Loretta has in mind? That Obama will now accurately describe Islamic terrorism for what it is? I don’t think so.)
Did a workplace dispute boil over?
“So far, officials have speculated that Farook’s apparent radicalization may have been part of the reason. Part of it may have stemmed from workplace tensions. But they have declined to label this a terrorist attack.
“It would be irresponsible and premature for me to call this terrorism,” FBI official David Bowdich said Thursday. “The FBI defines terrorism very specifically, and that is the big question for us: What is the motivation for this?”
Good old “David Bowdich”. He knows what the Big Boss wants said. I predict big things for Mr. Bowdich. When Obama names Loretta to head the new Cabinet post of “Chief of Secret Police”, good old David might replace her as Dept of “Justice (?)” head.
Carol Brown had better be looking over her shoulder. An excellent column but Loretta Lynch may determine that it fulfills her “greatest fear”.
Mountain of evidence points to terror as law enforcement searches for motive
DLH
