Deserves the widest possible dissemination and thoughtful consideration
Americans are living in a “soft” tyranny at the moment…but it will change, and not for the better, in the near future.
Kurt Schlichter writing at Town Hall notes instances of Obama’s lawless rule and Hillary’s various felonies, but time and space allow only to cite a few of the worst.
My “personal favorites” include immigration law. “Sanctuary Cities” directly violate federal immigration law, yet they are permitted, actually promoted by the DOJ. Laws passed which mirror federal immigration law and intended to uphold and enforce it, as in Arizona and Texas are invalidated by the DOJ!
Why would anyone suggest that “comprehensive immigration reform” would not result in its immediate and “comprehensive” violation of any or all parts by the federal government if it chose to?
We include some excerpts but the entire article is highly recommended.
=============================================================
You Owe Them Nothing – Not Respect, Not Loyalty, Not Obedience
(snip)
Hillary Clinton is manifestly guilty of multiple felonies. Her fans deny it half-heartedly, but mostly out of habit – in the end, it’s fine with them if she’s a felon. They don’t care. It’s just some law. What’s the big deal? It doesn’t matter that anyone else would be in jail right now for doing a fraction of what she did. But the law is not important. Justice is not important.
The attorney general secretly canoodles with the husband of the subject of criminal investigation by her own department and the president, the enforcer of our laws, shrugs. The media, the challenger of the powerful, smirks. They rub our noses in their contempt for the law. And by doing so, demonstrate their contempt for us.
Only power matters, and Hillary stands ready to accumulate more power on their behalf so their oaths, their alleged principles, their duty to the country – all of it goes out the window.
( snip)
There is one law for them, and another for us. Sanctuary cities? Obama’s immigration orders? If you conservatives can play by the rules and pass your laws, then we liberals will just not enforce them. You don’t get the benefit of the laws you like. We get the benefit of the ones we do, though. Not you. Too bad, rubes.
(snip)
Who is standing against this? Not the judges. The Constitution? Meh. Why should their personal agendas be constrained by some sort of foundational document? Judges find rights that don’t appear in the text and gut ones that do. Just ask a married gay guy in Los Angeles who can’t carry a concealed weapons to protect himself from [OMITTED] radicals.
The politicians won’t stand against this. The Democrats support allowing the government to jail people for criticizing politicians and clamor to take away citizens’ rights merely because some government flunky has put their name on a list. Their “minority report” on Benghazi is an attack on Trump, and to them the idea of congressional oversight of a Democrat official whose incompetence put four Americans in the ground is not merely illegitimate; it’s a joke.
Is the media standing against this, those sainted watchdogs protecting us from the powerful? Don’t make me laugh.
(snip)
They don’t realize that by rejecting the rule of law, they have set us free. We are independent. We owe them nothing – not respect, not loyalty, not obedience. But with a firm reliance on the protection of divine Providence, we will still mutually pledge those who have earned our loyalty with their adherence to the rule of law, our lives, our fortunes and our sacred honor.
For your thoughtful consideration, read the entire article here.
DLH
