A powerful and likely accurate analysis of the most shocking episode of corruption at the highest levels of national security and law enforcement in history! It is from Andrew Napolitano writing at The Washington Times,
FBI exoneration of Hillary raises a disturbing question: What if the fix was in?
The last of over two-dozen “what if . . .” questions Napolitano poses in the article:
What if Hillary Clinton has engaged in espionage and public corruption and FBI agents know that she has? What if they have evidence to prove it but they could not present anything to a grand jury because President Obama wants Mrs. Clinton, and not Donald Trump, to succeed him in office? What if this blatant political interference with a criminal investigation is itself a crime? What if, midstream in this criminal investigation, the fix was put in?
Purely speculative will be the response to any who try to elevate the discussion of, not its probability, but its likelihood. That would very well be the reaction of liberal, conservative, and establishment figures all across the ideological and political landscape.
Such is the condition of governance in America today!
One thing that Judge Napolitano fails to address in his provocative column is the role of Washington figures beyond the Obama administration… insiders and key figures on the “other side”…including heavy hitters among Republican officeholders.
For example, what about former GOP congressman and chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, Mike Rogers. And how about the Republican leadership who receives the most sensitive briefings on national security?
In light of this, we think it worthwhile to revisit a highly provocative piece from a Nov. 2014 conservativetreehouse post:
The Motives Behind The November Rogers/Ruppersberger “House Intelligence Panel” Report On Benghazi…
The whole idea of a massive coverup of an enormous national security scandal is unthinkable in the prospect and absolutely chilling in its very real possibility!
DLH
