Donald Trump’s ‘lewd comments’ about women dominates the news as seemingly one of the biggest stories ever; but should it? When has a candidate for the highest office in the land said anything more alarming, more threatening than Hillary Clinton? Even some of the world’s worst, most brutal dictators, on the edge of gaining absolute power have not made such a public condemnation of a large number of the people they will govern. (continues below)
THE HILLARY CLINTON DETENTION CENTER FOR DEPLORABLE AMERICANS AWAITING DETERMINATION OF THEIR POTENTIAL FOR REDEMPTION
We have been puzzled as to why the most alarming statement Hillary Clinton has made has apparently gone unchallenged.
Or is it a studied intention of the media (liberal and ‘fair and balanced’ alike) to avoid considering the awful implications?
Widely reported a few weeks ago, Hillary Clinton publicly declared that as much as one-fourth of American voters are both “deplorable” and, more shockingly, “irredeemable”!
Her running mate, Tim Kaine, mistakenly said in his recent ghastly debate performance that Ms. Clinton had “apologized” for her revealing comment. Actually, Clinton only expressed some regret that she may have overestimated the percentage of Americans she deems to be “irredeemable”. *
What should greatly disturb all Americans is that a possible leader of this country would openly declare that there are several million of its citizens she considers “deplorable” and “irredeemable”!
This begs the question for Ms. Clinton which she should be called upon by every news media source, elective office holder, members of both major parties, and every American voter to explain exactly what she intends to do as president about these “problem citizens” who, in her opinion, cannot be “redeemed”.
There are tragic precedents in world history and in present day countries where leaders have made similar judgements toward a segment of their populations…and, from their position of ultimate power, acted on these judgements in the most horrifying way.
Always a reference which draws criticism, but a valid one, in our judgement, is comparison to the fate of some 6 million people in Europe in the last century, who were also determined by a brutal, all-powerful ‘leader” to be so dangerous and so impossible to “redeem”, that the only solution was a “Final Solution”.
Not to suggest Ms. Clinton would be similarly inclined to resort to such measures to deal with undesirable citizens who are incapable of changing but she should be required to tell the American people exactly how she would address what she obviously sees as some sort of threat to the state or to her prospective governance.
It is inconceivable that such a deliberate and chilling assessment of people she hopes to have power over can go unchallenged. DLH
——————————————————————————————————–
* Source Fox News
“Racist, sexist, homophobic, xenophobic, Islamaphobic, you name it,” Clinton said Friday. “There are people like that, and (Trump) has lifted them up.”
Clinton, in her apology, also said: “I regret saying ‘half’ — that was wrong. But let’s be clear, what’s really ‘deplorable’ is that Donald Trump hired a major advocate for the so-called ‘alt-right’ movement to run his campaign and that David Duke and other white supremacists see him as a champion of their values.”
Clinton campaign spokesman Nick Merrill late Friday defended Clinton in tweets of his own, arguing that his candidate was referring to half of Trump’s event attendees.
“Obviously not everyone supporting Trump is part of the alt-right, but alt-right leaders are with Trump,” he said. “And their supporters appear to make up half his crowd when you observe the tone of his events.”
