Our humble observation
Lacking the ‘reputation’ for keen intelligence, impeccable accuracy, and honest reporting, like, say, the MSNBC “herd”, we at Veritaspac would nevertheless like to offer our humble observation on all this “collusion” talk.
We suspect there are many Americans who probably think as we do that there is far more evidence of “collusion” related to Barack Obama’s secret negotiations with Iran to assist that nation in acquiring nuclear weapons than even hinted at in the Trump-Russia matter.
In fact there is nothing revealed so far about a Trump-Russia “collusion” that comes even close to the undeniable recorded commitment by Obama to Vladimir Putin to “collude” with the Russian leader on nuclear weapons if only Putin would cut him some slack until after the 2012 election.
A special prosecutor would be much more effectively employed investigating such real evidence. is far more evidence of “collusion” related to Barack Obama’s secret negotiations with Iran to assist that nation in acquiring nuclear weapons than even hinted at in the Trump-Russia matter.
DLH
12 times Dems, Repubs said no evidence of Trump-Russia collusion; 10 times people claimed there was
- To date, scandalous accusations of treason against Trump haven’t borne out
- Incendiary claims unsupported by public evidence after 10 months of probes
Ten months after questions were first raised, there’s no evidence that Donald Trump “colluded” with Russia, according to prominent Democrats and Republicans who have reviewed information or received briefings.
