- Just a prediction mind you
- Every newspaper wants an exclusive, and every liberal paper wants to do in Kavanaugh
- Repeating AP and WaPo and New Yorker trash isn’t always enough
- When people who actually know Kavanaugh vouch for him, well whats a liberal rag to do . . .
- So after six days of memory clarification in the editorial room, a middle aged staffer volunteers to come forward, and tell the story that must be told
Wants no part of the resistance
Usual format will do: “I was in a drunken stupor and . . . I know Brett Kavanaugh was involved . . . The drunken stupor part, including gerbil abuse among staff, is thought to be believable for QCT alums, everything after the “and” is definitely made up for the cause. The formula allows for the foggy memory defense for the accuser as far as perjury. Witnesses that deny it occurred or say Kavanaugh could not have been there are just in denial . . .drunken gerbil abusing reprobates that they are. Corroboration comes from people who say they heard about it at the time. Probably from reading the QC Times expose. Sort of like the deep state gambit against Trump. Make something up. Plant the story. Say that reports must be investigated and then do your dirty work on the target. Make em prove they didn’t do it.
So here are some responses to the latest woman coming forward, Ms Ramirez (nice touch, get a non-Buffy into the act) to “remember” things about Kavanaugh that her own witnesses deny. First the stories:
Grassley Slams Democrats For ‘Withholding Information’ On Kavanaugh Allegations
https://townhall.com/tipsheet/bethbaumann/2018/09/23/grassley-slams-democrats-for-withholding-information-on-kavanaugh-allegations-n2521900
Uh, Did Anyone Catch This Glaring Plot Hole In The Latest Accusation Against Kavanaugh?; UPDATE: Another Shoe To Drop?
https://townhall.com/tipsheet/mattvespa/2018/09/24/uh-did-anyone-catch-this-glaring-plot-hole-in-the-latest-accusation-against-kava-n2521895
From commenters to the above articles:
“assessing her memories is code for the check cleared and my fuzzy memory cleared up”
“His political rivals started a smear campaign by using the “guilty until proven guilty” mob rule. . . .”
“After six days of carefully assessing her memories” … is quite a sentence
“While assessing her memories with a team of lawyers, she had time to sign a contract with the @NewYorker & pop off for a fabulous photo shoot for this weekend’s surprise announcement. Feels just a tiny bit #staged “
Silent acquiescence. It all boils down to MSM control of the Narrative.
Oh good lord. You know the fact that these 2 are the absolute best the Democrats could come up with is pretty telling.
Any republican that is in the Senate that reads this and buys it, might as well announce they are a democrat when running in the next election.
All alleged eyewitnesses who spoke to New Yorker deny it. The corroborating “witness” is an anonymous classmate who was not at the party but claims second-hand knowledge.
Here is the story that counts:
‘A Man of Honor, Integrity’: More High School Female Friends Defend Kavanaugh
‘A Man of Honor, Integrity’: More High School Female Friends Defend Kavanaugh

