DO YOU BELIEVE THIS LADY IS THE TRAITOROUS, TREACHEROUS “ANONYMOUS”?
Here is the story, and it is rather overwhelming: Victoria Coates is the rat
Here’s ‘Anonymous,’ Trump Aides Say. And Here’s How They Outed Her
By Paul Sperry, RealClearInvestigations
Philadelphia has a reputation for rats*
It’s a compelling case, and though sad and reluctant to believe it, I must say that I do think this is the despicable culprit.
It especially troubles me that she was a close associate of Ted Cruz whom I respect a great deal, and that she seemed, at least outwardly, to believe in many of the same solid conservative principles that I do.
There seems, though, to me that a thorough investigation was done and the evidence that she is the villain is irrefutable.
If true, this is typical of some of the truly dishonest, reprehensible, traitorous people who have surrounded Trump since his inauguration. They have presented themselves as something they are not (dedicated from the beginning to overthrowing the institution and the person who hired them).
Demanding “loyalty” from a subordinate is one thing; appointing and bestowing confidence and trust in the people a leader must rely on is another thing.
Such people, who cannot be trusted to reflect and carry out the duties they signed on to do, have no place in any organization! To accept an appointment while fully intending to use it as a means to undermine the person and institution which appointed you is dishonest almost beyond belief. A predisposition to betray their own pledges to carry out their responsibilities is not ‘honorable’…it unacceptable and immoral.
What are your thoughts? dlh
Chiming in at my collaborators invitation, a take not a disagreement:
The reported disbelief by some of her compatriots may be innocent given that “Anonymous” is said to have made very clear in the introduction to the book: “If asked, I will strenuously deny I am the author of this book.” So friends and family can be fooled if trusting.
As for Ted Cruz’s association with the alleged “Anonymous” Cruz has been public in praise and honorable in disagreement with Trump, and definitely maintained a working relationship, indeed I suspect developed an understanding of the Trump persona in I think an example of statesmanlike humility. As to whether there is any fealty by Cruz to Coates, if so Cruz might want to reconsider its placement to a Mitt Romney champion (read article).
As for “Anonymous”, it is one thing for, as a doctrinaire policy advocate, someone like Coates to become part of a legitimate administration in the hope of influencing it, but indeed treacherous for “anonymous” to continue in it with purposes of undermining in a harmful, disloyal, irresponsible, underhanded way, breeding distrust, injuriously disrupting, faulting matters of no consequence, bringing innocent associates into disrepute, irresponsibly risk killing the baby for a bathwater change. That is what humanoid rats do, including the ones who hail from Philadelphia. R Mall
*https://patch.com/pennsylvania/roxborough/philadelphia-earns-spot-most-rat-infested-list-orkin
