We are calling on readers to contact Iowa’s Congressional delegation (sworn in on January 3rd) and demand that they join with the growing support in Congress for the efforts to insure that the integrity of the presidential vote is verified.
Open letter to Iowa’s political leadership
At this writing it is reported that about a dozen Senators and 140 House members have pledged to oppose or delay certification of presidential electors on January 6th, some contingent on an emergency audit by an electoral commission. The level of discontent with the validity of the November presidential election results such pledges reflect is extremely serious and compelling to resolve. Objective study supports that concern and compels this writer and hopefully you to take a stand in support of insuring the integrity of the vote.
Senators Grassley (R) & Ernst (R) Representative Miller-Meeks (R), Hinson (R), Feenstra (R) and Axne (D) will you protect Iowa’s presidential vote from being discounted by others through a civil solution to substantial charges of electoral corruption including official acts that impinge on the rights of all citizens as provided for in Section 1 of the 14th Amendment?
A fraudulent presidential election must not be allowed to result in an inauguration when substantial evidence exists of sufficient fraud and other illegalities that has not been adjudicated on the merits. Serious risk to political comity exists and it is in your power and hopefully your prescience to provide for meaningful fair-minded resolve as Senator Cruz and others have called for.
The situation is the stuff that can destroy party and national unity. Your patriotic and constitutional laurels are not at issue but be aware that they pale in the face of inaction in such historic moments as this.
There are unprecedented contemporaneous evidenced allegations of voter fraud and official disregard of state statutory and constitutional law in many states sufficient to call into question the parroted but as yet not finalized results.
Iowa voted solidly for Donald Trump but if cheating targeting Trump in other states is allowed to prevail, then Iowa’s vote and voters on January 6th will be victimized, their choice unfairly and unlawfully discounted and cheating will have been confirmed and allowed to rule the day.
There should be no certification of the electors until the country can be reasonably assured that the results truly reflect legitimate voter activity and adherence to law by official actors and that requires a transparent and thorough examination of the evidence and charges.
Readers:
Our page bar at top — Legislator Links — can be used to find contact information for Iowa’s political leadership. The Governor and state legislators should be included as they have a responsibility to stand up and protect Iowa’s presidential vote with official pronouncements, resolve and support that wide scale electoral cheating is incompatible with federal government, our republic, one person one vote principles and political comity. This rates an emergency special (or early) legislative session if need be.
Contested elections were anticipated by our founding documents and have happened in past. The articles appended below recount them and indeed that challenges have been initiated by Democrats! Please contact our political leadership to not shrink from their duty to insure our party, our state, our country that the integrity of the vote must be defended.
Fox News article:
GOP senators, led by Cruz, to object to Electoral College certification, demand emergency audit
The lawmakers call for an electoral commission to be established to audit result
A group of GOP senators led by Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas, will object to the Jan. 6 certification of the presidential election results next week unless there is an emergency 10-day audit of the results by an electoral commission.
Cruz and the other senators claim the Nov. 3 election “featured unprecedented allegations of voter fraud and illegal conduct.”
Joining Cruz are Sens. Ron Johnson, R-Wis.; James Lankford, R-Okla.; Steve Daines, R-Mont.; John Kennedy, R-La.; Marsha Blackburn, R-Tenn., and Mike Braun, R-Ind.; as well as Sens.-elect Cynthia Lummis, R-Wyo.; Roger Marshall, R-Kansas; Bill Hagerty, R-Tenn., and Tommy Tuberville, R-Ala.
Their effort is separate from one announced by Sen. Josh Hawley, R-Mo., who said this week that he will object to what he claims was the failure of some states — most notably Pennsylvania — to follow their own election laws.
“Voter fraud has posed a persistent challenge in our elections, although its breadth and scope are disputed,” the lawmakers said Saturday in a statement. “By any measure, the allegations of fraud and irregularities in the 2020 election exceed any in our lifetimes.”
While the Trump campaign has challenged the results in dozens of lawsuits, judges have dismissed them due to a lack of evidence. Attorney General William Barr said last month that “to date, we have not seen fraud on a scale that could have effected a different outcome in the election.”
A source familiar with the effort by the GOP senators told Fox News that it was Cruz who orchestrated the push just days before the joint session of Congress on Wednesday to officially approve the Electoral College votes electing former Vice Presiden
The lawmakers say there is a precedent of Democrats objecting to election results in 1969, 2001, 2005 and 2019. “And, in both 1969 and 2005, a Democratic Senator joined with a Democratic House Member in forcing votes in both houses on whether to accept the presidential electors being challenged,” they said.
The senators and senators-elect are calling for Congress to appoint a commission to conduct a 10-day emergency audit of the election returns in states where the results are disputed. They cite as precedent the 1877 race between Samuel Tilden and Rutherford Hayes in which there were allegations of fraud in multiple states.
“In 1877, Congress did not ignore those allegations, nor did the media simply dismiss those raising them as radicals trying to undermine democracy,” the lawmakers said in the statement. “Instead, Congress appointed an Electoral Commission — consisting of five Senators, five House Members, and five Supreme Court Justices — to consider and resolve the disputed returns.”
“We should follow that precedent. To wit, Congress should immediately appoint an Electoral Commission, with full investigatory and fact-finding authority, to conduct an emergency 10-day audit of the election returns in the disputed states. Once completed, individual states would evaluate the Commission’s findings and could convene a special legislative session to certify a change in their vote, if needed.”
If that doesn’t happen, the senators intend to vote against certification.
“Accordingly, we intend to vote on January 6 to reject the electors from disputed states as not ‘regularly given’ and ‘lawfully certified’ (the statutory requisite), unless and until that emergency 10-day audit is completed,” they said in the statement.
“American democracy relies on the consent of the governed,” Sen. Blackburn and Sen.-elect Hagerty said in a separate statement. “Allegations of voter fraud, irregularities and unconstitutional actions diminish public confidence in what should be a free, fair and transparent process. Protecting the integrity of the electoral process is paramount to preserving trust and legitimacy in the final outcome.”
It is unclear whether they will rally more Republicans to their cause, given Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell’s public acceptance of Biden’s victory. While the lawmakers note that most Democrats and some Republicans will vote to certify the results, they argue that an audit would increase the public’s faith in the process.
“These are matters worthy of the Congress, and entrusted to us to defend. We do not take this action lightly. We are acting not to thwart the democratic process, but rather to protect it,” they said. “And every one of us should act together to ensure that the election was lawfully conducted under the Constitution and to do everything we can to restore faith in our Democracy.”
The effort by the senators marks a major win for President Trump’s continuing efforts to challenge the results of the election. Trump has repeatedly claimed he beat Biden, who flipped a number of states, including Georgia and Arizona, to get over the 270 Electoral College votes needed to secure the White House.
Trump’s campaign has launched a number of legal challenges, while Trump himself has urged states with Republican governors and legislatures to overturn Biden’s victories.
Senate GOP leadership, however, is against efforts to challenge Biden’s win — with McConnell urging Republicans behind closed doors not to contest the election results.
But if the group of GOP senators object, along with a similar effort by House Republicans, the joint session of Congress would be dissolved, and the House and Senate would then meet separately to debate any contested state’s electoral votes.
Afterward, each body would vote whether to accept or reject any contested votes. Then the House and Senate would reconvene the joint session.
In the House, at least 13 incoming House GOP freshmen are expected to back a move by Rep. Mo Brooks, R-Ala., to object to certification. Rep.-elect Kat Cammack, Fla., was the latest to announce Saturday in a statement that she was among them.
The last time this happened (and only the second time in U.S. history) was in January 2005, following President’ George W. Bush’s narrow re-election victory over Democratic challenger John Kerry of Massachusetts. One Senate Democrat – Barbara Boxer of California – and one House Democrat – Rep. Stephanie Tubbs Jones of Ohio – objected. In 2017, a handful of House Democrats objected to Trump’s victory over Hillary Clinton, but no Senate Democrats joined them.
A state’s slate of electoral votes would only be thrown out if both the House and Senate vote to do so — something that is unlikely given the Democratic majority in the House, and the push by GOP Senate leaders to certify.
Related reading (important):
He Has Receipts: Liberal Reporter Calls Out Democrats’ Hypocrisy Over Objecting Election Results
