Note: As long as the QC Times will not chronicle the Gosnell murder trial and the horrors of abortion, this lowly website will call them to task. Another key word search “Gosnell” of the QC Times online website just this hour — incredibly nothing from them different than our last report.
From our Senior Editor —
“No abortion procedure is a birth”
So sayeth the QC Times’ erudite editorial board and its award winning
editorial writer.
Then what’s this Gosnell trial thing about? If it’s a “botched”
abortion, what does one call the survivor of same. It couldn’t be a
baby. The QC Times has long ago declared its “ruling” on that!
And then, of course, the same Times editorial admonishes us silly
social values freaks: … “the physician who has actually studied and
performed …the procedures and who has personally examined the ‘woman’
(who cannot be called a “mother” under those circumstances for that
would be in defiance of the Times’ editors wise declarations)… must
certainly know better than “legislators and judges deliberating in
government buildings.”
So there again, what’s this Dr. Gosnell trial thing about? There it is,
being held in a “government building”. And do those jurors and another
judge know more about murder than a physician who has actually studied
and performed these procedures?
I think we’d better consult the QC Times editorial board and their
award winning editorial writer for the correct answer to these questions
As the Times asks, “Who knows better?” DLH
Would that the QC Times editorial board be bound by integrity to view this report from Glen Beck. Of course that is about as likely as they would stop getting their editorial talking points from Planned Parenthood, Slate, and the Huffington Post.
