. . . blatant defiance of all law and constitutional government! It would be shocking were it not so obviously growing in scope and seriousness throughout Barack Obama’s term in office. And a pathetic, dangerous Democratic party supports this tyranny.
If either of these actions appears to be remotely imminent, and the GOP does not act forcefully, all out, including immediate impeachment proceedings, to block, most certainly any semblance of a free society is gone forever.
How many Americans will by week’s end be aware of this? And, how many will disapprove?
Elections will be neither decisive nor even necessary! Think about it America!
From Ian Smith, Via The Hill
Leaked DHS memo shows Obama might circumvent DAPA injunction
Bottom line: The memo foreshadows more tactical offensives in a giant administrative amnesty for all 12 million illegal aliens who’ve broken our immigration laws (and many other laws) that will emerge before the next inaugural in January 2016. According to the authors, one negative factor for granting EADs to illegal aliens, visa-overstayers, etc., is that they’ll still “face difficulties in pursuing permanent residence due to ineligibility or being subject to unlawful presence inadmissibility for which a waiver is required.” This is in reference to the reality that an EAD isn’t a green card and that eventually the EAD-beneficiaries are supposed to apply to ‘adjust their status,’ which cannot be done without showing evidence of lawful status. But this might change, they write. The DHS “macro-level policy goal”, we’re told, is to assist individuals to stay “until they are ready and able to become immigrants.” This would seem to say that DHS, the largest federal law enforcement agency in the nation, is banking on awarding those who’ve broken our laws and violated our national sovereignty.
Also from The Hill:
GOP: Obama circumventing Senate in Paris climate deal talks
Republican senators accused President Obama Tuesday of deliberately circumventing Congress in his attempt to reach a broad U.N. deal on climate change.
Sen. John Barrasso (R-Wyo.), chairman of a Foreign Relations Committee subpanel, said . . .
“Just like the Kyoto Protocol and the United Nations framework convention on climate change, any agreement that commits our nation to targets or timetables must go through the process established by the founders in our Constitution. It must be submitted to the United States Senate for its advice and consent,” Barrasso told Todd Stern, the State Department’s top negotiator for the deal. . . .
Sen. Jim Inhofe (R-Okla.), who wanted to have a joint hearing on the talks with the Environment and Public Works Committee, which he chairs, said in a statement that the deal should go through the Senate. . . .
“President Obama and his administrative officials are going out of their way to circumvent the role of the U.S. Senate in this negotiating process and I am disappointed that the minority would enable such behavior,” he said.
Republicans have long accused Obama of working with international leaders to craft a deal that would not require Senate approval, as treaties generally do under the Constitution.
Stern said whether the deal would go through the Senate hinges largely on whether countries’ individual contributions are legally binding — a factor that has not yet been finalized in the negotiations.
DLH
When this gets kicked up to the SCOTUS Justice Roberts will save us. Or maybe “Jeb will fix it.” Somebody will do something, right?