We guess all those other shooters were not “active”
Liberal media reporting on guns
Many conservative sites reported and commented on the stunning display of liberal anti-gun media bias, indeed journalistic corruption, by Katie Couric recently. It is unlikely you were informed of the matter anywhere other than by conservative media. The matter is ably presented with the latest developments by Matthew K. Burke in this Politistick article:
Leftist Katie Couric Issues Phony Apology for Anti-Second Amendment Rights Propaganda
No story, move along . . . nothing gives the liberal media pause, circumspection or perspective when it comes to their take on gun violence.
There was a shooting today on the campus of UCLA, but UCLA is in LA and is a gun free zone in a larger hostile to guns zone, like most Democrat run metropolises. It was reported everywhere. The story was breathlessly reported as if in presumptive anticipation.
Murder-suicide kills 2 at UCLA, shuts down campus
LOS ANGELES, June 1 (Reuters) – A murder-suicide killed two people at the University of California, Los Angeles on Wednesday, shutting down the campus for two hours as officers in camouflage and tactical gear responded to reports of a shooting.
“A homicide and a suicide occurred,” Los Angeles Police Chief Charlie Beck told reporters near the scene, saying a gun was recovered at the scene.
“It appears to be entirely contained,” he said. “There are no suspects outstanding and no continuing threat to UCLA’s campus.”
Interestingly, nothing about those other “active shooters” in Miami, in other parts of LA, in Baltimore , in New Orleans, in . . .
36 Shot and 4 Killed in Chicago Over Memorial Day Weekend
Seems there are a lot of “active shooters” in all these gun restricted zones. They are dense populated areas, where lots of people could be killed. Why no media presumptions? Why no evacuations? Just wondering.
R Mall
