Read title as Moron Anti-Trump Protestors
Who are they trying to shock?
And they think normal America is supposed to take them seriously. Here is a look at what journalists for The Federalist frequently saw while walking around Washington DC observing and interviewing participants in main Women’s March held there yesterday. If you think the crude messages were exceptional, as in aberrational, just listen to the invited speakers from the dais (also see our earlier post).
12 Things We Saw At The Women’s March In Washington DC
Apparently marchers were encouraged to trash The Trump International Hotel property as part of their protest (pictured):
As is the norm when liberals protest, others are left to clean up the mess. It is also true when they leave office. Quoting from the same link: “Trump was elected, in part, to clean up the mess left by liberals over the last eight years”
The most ubiquitous theme at the protests was feigned disgust over a “misogynistic” comment made by Trump privately many years ago. We say feigned because 1) they repeat ad nauseam and exaggerate the significance of the comment, and 2) they are hypocrites about it, showing no such outrage over far worse by their political friends, and probably many promoting what they condemn in others through their purchases. As we have chronicled several times in these pages, the fact is that Barack and Michelle Obama championed purveyors (emphasis on the purv) of misogynistic rap music, invited such “artists” into their home, extolled them as role models FOR THEIR CHILDREN. How is it that a non-public comment by Trump is made out to be contemptible but those who extol mass marketers of far worse are held in high esteem?
Well there are the purposeful sinister reasons motivating the organizers but we do not underestimate the power of empty-headed fellow travelers either. Which brings up Gwyneth Paltrow again (notable celebrity champion of the protestors). This article provides a list of Gwyneth Paltrow’s 25 Most Ridiculous Pretentious Quotes . Pictured are two from the blog as they present them:
Now making a statement with the use of headdress was very important to participants in the wymen’s march. In particular they promoted donning something representative (however a play on words) of a particular female body part. The symbolism was intentional and undeniable in its promotion of female solidarity through, ironically, promoting the thinking of women as having their head in their genitals as compared to being whole human beings.
Nevertheless, realizing the usefulness of symbolism in speaking truth to power, we here at veritaspac propose that the same people can show their solidarity with liberal males by this appropriate wearable.
R Mall
