Would the liberal media have achieved its aims but for WikiLeaks?

DC Secrets and Lies

When you get into the details of  Clarice Feldman’s column at American Thinker, it reveals some well documented and very scary stuff we’ve read or heard only bits and pieces of.

If we had an honest and dedicated pro-American federal bureaucracy and two political parties with similar qualities, we wouldn’t need a Wikileaks.  If there were honest journalists operating in liberal outlets they would be pulling this stuff together and reporting  it in context.

Feldman starts out with:

A quick look at Obama’s history reveals he has always had the inclination, motivation, and opportunity to snoop on and disseminate information about his political opponents. It’s how he made his political career: getting his opponents’ private divorce records unsealed and leaked with the help of the Chicago Tribune.

He and his administration continued this pattern and practice of skirting laws throughout his eight years in office, . . .

After reviewing key aspects about the so-called Russian connection to Trump we see:

“In any event, both the former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper and the head of the FBI James Comey have stated without equivocation that there was no evidence found of coordination between the Trump campaign and Russia.

“On the other hand, there is increasing evidence of Russian ties to Hillary Clinton and those closely connected to her.”

It is an engaging read in its entirety.  Sadly, if any remains, it reduces any confidence in the integrity of the dominant media  AP, NBC, CBS, ABC, NYT, WaPo — the whole get Trump alphabet soup reporting out of DC.

DLH

This entry was posted in UNCATEGORIZED. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *