From Lucifer’s mouth to Colbert’s ear

We must apologize for presenting this story without blanking out the most incredibly offensive remark we, quite frankly, have ever heard a major television network personality make on air. However, we feel that it is important that you know exactly what this “CBS star” actually ranted on air about the President of the United States.

Hey Democratic voters! Thank God this guy is on your side!

Is it fair to place your ordinary citizens who, out of habit, ignorance, or laziness vote for any Democrat who invariably recites his concern for the poor, the downtrodden, the elderly, those who flock to our shores for a better life, etc etc together with a nasty sub-human like Stephen Colbert?

I would only say many of your “soulmates ” were faster than the speed of light to characterize all of us conservatives with all the worst elements that people like Colbert could dream up. Remember the term “deplorables”?

Fair or not, Stephen Colbert’s your guy. Don’t you feel like you need a shower?
——————————-

“And then (referring to President Trump) Colbert finished it off with the most scathing line of them all: “In fact, the only thing your mouth is good for is being Vladimir Putin’s cock holster…”

There’s your next Emmy winning performance.

Stephen Colbert’s Shocking Attack On Trump Concludes With A Homophobic Slur 

DLH

This entry was posted in UNCATEGORIZED. Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to From Lucifer’s mouth to Colbert’s ear

  1. DLH says:

    Readers, I must apologize. I’ve apparently unfairly criticized Mr. Stephen Colbert for merely exercising his First Amendment rights:

    “Stephen Colbert’s raunchy joke about President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin engaging in a sex act is likely protected by the First Amendment, FCC Commissioner Ajit Pai told Newsmax TV on Wednesday.

    “…Pai said that unless the veteran comic’s cracks — aired on FCC-regulated broadcast television — were deemed to be obscene, there would be no consequences.”

    Thus, after all, according to the FCC chairman it would take a finding by that agency that Mr. Colbert’s remarks were “obscene” to even suggest that that fine gentleman did anything more than engage in a little good-natured chiding.

    And what are the odds of the FCC seeing anything off-color about such a clever quip?

    But I’ll just leave it at this, as I exercise MY 1st Amendment rights: I see Stephen Colbert as a GIANT HOLSTER, hungrily in search of satisfaction from a Gigantic ‘organ’. (If anyone is offended, I certainly apologize.)

Comments are closed.