THURSDAY WAS ‘SMUG LITTLE CREEPS’ DAY’ AT THE ADAM SCHITT ‘INQUISITION’
If you missed the ‘testimony’ of Fiona Hill and David Holmes before the House Intelligence Committee Thursday, besides not seeing this pair of Schitt’s “Star Witnesses”, you didn’t miss anything of significance.
Nearly every State Dept. employee who has appeared in this farce has been uniquely smug and surprisingly, not all that bright, or at least, very un-informed. Of course that applies also to the Democratic party members of the committee including the arrogant twit, its Chairman.
Each of Schitt’s handpicked “witnesses” have, of course been critical of the President of the United States ‘dabbling’ in their exclusive bailiwick, foreign policy. After all, what business does the person who more than 60 million Americans elected to be the nation’s chief executive have as far as the work only the geniuses at State have the ‘expertise’ to do.
Aside from his superhuman hearing capability, the creepy Holmes guy didn’t deserve much attention. But, boy, does that guy have an exceptional hearing sense! He can tell you verbatim everything said by a party speaking through a telephone not on speaker from several feet away in a crowded restaurant. (He didn’t claim to but I’d be surprised he wouldn’t have told Schitt’s committee he could ‘read the lips’ of the person on the other end of the phone conversation.)
Anyway, the ‘hit of the show’ was the “Fabulous Fiona”, a UK ‘coal miner’s daughter’ The weird anecdote of the day was offered during Hill’s testimony under the keen questioning by one of the goofier Democrat members.
When she was just a young thing, a pre-teen student, it seems a fellow student set her hair on fire while she was discussing something really important in class. According to the telling, Little Fiona patted the flames out and went on with her commentary.
Right then it was obvious this was a future U.S. ambassador who would set foreign policy for Ukraine, and face down powerful Russian leaders…as well as the President of the United States.
It wasn’t shown on TV but I’m guessing this tale brought tears to the eyes of Congressman Denny Heck (D,WA), who often sobbed while reflecting on the incredible courage he’s seen in the Foreign Service people who appeared before this hearing. (Denny’s a real piece of work…some village in Washington state is missing its ‘idiot’.)
As to the contributions to the purpose for which the Democrats staged this two week farce…that is, to recount all of President’s awful, terrible foreign policy errors, Ms. Hill and Mr. Holmes didn’t bring much, other than the frequent smirk and audible sigh when having to respond to a Republican representative’s question. dlh
Rudy Giuliani says US diplomats were doing the bidding of George Soros in Ukraine, in interview with Glenn Beck (picture not in original)
Rudy Giuliani told Glenn Beck during an exclusive interview that U.S. diplomats were doing the bidding of billionaire philanthropist George Soros in Ukraine in a “massive pay-for-play” scheme that included falsifying evidence against President Donald Trump.
Giuliani, the president’s personal attorney, spoke to Beck on his program Wednesday about the claims being made against him by Democrats in their ongoing impeachment inquiry.
“The anti-corruption bureau is a contradiction,” said Giuliani about the bureau set up in Ukraine to root out corruption.
“They took all the corruption cases away from the prosecutor general, they gave it to the anti-corruption bureau, and they got rid of all the cases that offended Soros, and they included all the cases against Soros’ enemies,” he explained.
“One of the first cases they dismissed was a case in which his NGO, AntAC, was supposed to have embezzled a lot of money, but not only that, collected dirty information on Republicans to be transmitted, gotten by Ukrainians, to be transmitted to this woman Alexandra Chalupa and other people who worked for the Democratic National Committee,” Giuliani continued.
“The first case that [former prosecutor Yuri] Lutsenko tanked was that case at the request of the ambassador,” he added.
Elsewhere in the interview, Giuliani described his reaction when he discovered the Ukrainian collusion that undermined the accusations of the Democrats made against the president.
“Hallelujah! I now have what a defense lawyer always wants: I can go prove somebody else committed this crime!” Giuliani said.
Giuliani explained to Beck that he had gone to Ukraine seeking exculpatory evidence, that which would exonerate his client, the president, in the special counsel Robert Mueller investigation.
When Giuliani was asked directly about the identity of the whistleblower, he said that he could not speak about the matter publicly, and could not indicate if he knew the identity or not.
He also claimed that there were several prosecutors in Ukraine currently who were willing to testify about the collusion, but they were being blocked by the U.S. State Department. When prompted by Beck, he said he would provide for him the names of those individuals off air.
“The case is a massive pay-for-play multimillion-dollar scheme, and it is an absolute travesty of justice,” Giuliani said.
