- Two articles that make you cringe — about the regrettable facts if true and the context adequate — but also who wrote them, their sincerity and objectivity
- The two commentaries linked below are not written by Trump loyalists (there is a higher calling, just ask them). They purport to pontificate on practical politics regarding the need to vote in the Georgia runoff election having issued snide back-biting comments against Trump and his supporters without reservation for a long time.
- They have been firing from and into the circle regardless of effect (I wouldn’t call it friendly fire) it seems more for their iconoclast shtick or holier-than-thou purity.
Erick Erickson’s and Ann Coulter’s commentaries today should be read. If attorneys Woods and Powell are actively undermining the Georgia Senate special election to rail against the Republican establishment there, that serves no purpose. We believe sufficient Trump supporters there will hold their noses, vote and carry the Republicans over as they are more disgusted with Democrats. The Republican machine can be dealt with later.
Erickson’s conspiracy theory of Woods being a Democrat plant, or deep stater, and by implication Sidney Powell, are asstounding, assinine. I guess Alan Dershowitz and Jonathon Turley are Democrat plants as well (Let that rattle around a bit to appreciate the point that they have been helpful in defending election integrity).
The one service Coulter imparts is to vividly describe the signature verification issue in Georgia — of course while castigating Trump for not solving that as if he made state election laws.
Erickson:
