In Re Hillary, SCOTUS invokes a doctrine of “regium tueri invicem”

  • private server conducting government business, revealing classified information; all OK with SCOTUS?!
  • Royalty protect one another


By now, any conservative who thinks the Supreme Court is Anything More Than Another “Leftist-Liberal Washington Swamp Creature”, with a 6-3 liberal bias, is an unrealistic optimistic fool.

The reasons why this is such travesty of justice are too numerous to note here, but it should not be necessary for any reasonably intelligent American who has paid any attention at all.


The Supreme Court on Monday denied a bid by conservative watchdog group Judicial Watch to uphold a court ruling requiring Hillary Clinton to testify under oath about her private email system.

The Supreme Court’s denial was unsigned and issued without comment.
In January Judicial Watch filed a petition for writ of certiorari (“cert petition”) with the U.S. Supreme Court asking it to uphold a court ruling requiring Hillary Clinton to testify under oath about her private email system.

Hillary Clinton used a private email system to conduct official government business when she was the head of the Department of State.

Through many FOIA lawsuits, Judicial Watch revealed that many of Hillary Clinton’s emails contained classified material, including the name of a clandestine CIA agent.
Last March a federal court ordered a deposition of Hillary Clinton on her emails and Benghazi attack records in response to a FOIA lawsuit filed by Judicial Watch.

Hillary Clinton’s lawyers immediately filed an emergency appeal to stop her court-ordered email testimony.

Clinton’s team filed an emergency writ of mandamus to avoid testifying and the DC Court of Appeals granted her relief in August.

Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton released the following statement on the Supreme Court’s decision:

Hillary Clinton ignored the law but received special protection from both the courts and law enforcement. For countless Americans, this double standard of justice has destroyed confidence in the fair administration of justice. Americans would never have known about Hillary Clinton’s email and related pay for play scandals but for Judicial Watch’s diligence. We expect that the Biden State and Justice Departments will continue to protect her and cover up their own misconduct as we press for additional accountability through the courts.

This entry was posted in UNCATEGORIZED. Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to In Re Hillary, SCOTUS invokes a doctrine of “regium tueri invicem”

  1. DLH says:

    “The Supreme Court’s denial was unsigned and issued without comment.”
    “Unsigned and without comment”.
    Need any further evidence that this may well be the most corrupt Court in our history led by possibly the worst Chief Justice ever??
    No Justice signed it! so which “Justices” didn’t think that a Democrat now and in the foreseeable future should have to have ‘nosy’ American voters know how they conduct the highest level of government business or handle the most sensitive classified material.

    • Designated2 says:

      Might mean at best only three or four were willing to allow it? Their rules vary. So as you have often intimated SCOTUS is 6 liberal to 3 conservative and only two of the three are reliable.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *