Chuck Grassley voted to advance the 1.2 trillion dollar porkulas infrastructure bill
No whimper or “this is my strategy” from him that we are aware of
What risk did he place the country, advancing aspects of Democrat agenda?
Is Chuck Grassley so safe (either as the nominee or because he is retiring) that he feels he is effectively reproach proof on this, as regards policy and political damage to Republican brand?
The pro-life movement has been key to sustaining Chuck Grassley within the party
If the implication described in this article are not true, we do hope the good Senator will enlighten us