- Testimony and links with such implications
What gives Vaccuous © Typhoid Mary Cardholders® the right to go around selfishly infecting others, putting us at risk of DEATH with their get out of jail free pass to do so.
If they get sick and need treatment they should be segregated and denied entrance until agreeing to pay totally cash out of pocket . . . why should our insurance go up in coming years for something they decided to inject into their bodies when careful smart people actually followed the science and were duly skeptical of the jab opting for prevention, cures and subsequent natural immunity.
OK, these are a bit accusatory sensational attention grabbers but no less than what we are constantly subjected to by the dominant press and other vaccine mandators toward those who have made a decision against the current COVID “vaccines”. The purple prose above also does not reflect what we believe should be policy, they are to challenge the Vaccuous © by making a rhetorical point.
Friends and family have opted for the COVID vaccines, some in compelling situations but others more trusting of the bureaucracies medical and otherwise than serious risk analysis, perhaps victims of public health and medical malpractice downplaying the effective early diagnosis and cures providing real natural immunity encompassing COVID variants. In broad rough terms the mRNA jabs may provide 95 % “immunity” * to a specific, unvaried COVID-19 but natural processes and known cures do as well to CIOVID -19 AND its variants. But, whatever said here, as always do your own direct research or consult your physician.
This elucidating testimony on August 19 before a committee of the Michigan legislature in favor of Michigan HB4471, which would “prohibit discrimination against an employee or volunteer who declines or has not received certain vaccinations, including for COVID-19” along with the associated links we provide lends credence to the use of our retort to the tyrannical bureaucracies elected and corporate, the media and all the Karens traipsing about pushing the current batch of emergency use authorization (EUA) concoctions (one now sort of approved we are told) referred to as COVID-19 vaccines. The 9-minute video is by Christina Parks who in her testimony states that she holds a Ph.D. in cellular and molecular biology.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jktvh6k0qys
We found her testimony so succinct clear and compelling that we searched and found a YouTube posting so that we could take advantage of the transcript feature YouTube makes available. We have included that for those of us who prefer reading. While it is very useful the feature does not provide punctuation capitalization or paragraphing. The latter we imparted for readability based on our presumption about discrete points made.
Dr. Christina Parks Testimony on the Unscientific Foolishness of ‘Vaccine’ Mandates
hello my name is dr christina parks i receive my phd in cellular and molecular biology right here in the state of michigan from university of michigan medical school and so i’m very well versed in the science of both these mrna gene therapy vaccines this kind of technology as well as what a vaccine is designed to do in the body what it can do what it can’t do and the fact that this is extremely complex science that has been oversimplified in the media to basically take away our freedom of choice
what i want to address today in this limited time is the fact that vaccine requirements and mandates are based on the faulty assumption that the vaccines in question prevent transmission of the pathogen right does the vaccine for dtap prevent transmission
no
does the vaccine for flu prevent transmission
no
does do the vaccines for covid prevent transmission
no
in fact they were never designed to do that all right so you’re asking what about this 95 effectiveness they do not say that they prevent transmission they expressly say that they’re measuring whether they attenuate symptoms so they’re 95 effective based on their clinical trials at attenuating symptoms for the first variant which is essentially gone in our population right now
the predominant variant is the delta and cdc director wilinsky basic basically said that these vaccines have no ability to prevent infection by and transmission of the delta variant so our policy needs not to be built on the hope of what we think something we want it to do but what the data actually tell us
so do these viruses prevent the i mean do the vaccines prevent the virus from infecting and replicating in the nose and nasopharynx
no
they’ve only been shown to prevent that replication in the lungs they’re different the mucosa is very different than the lungs it’s very different than the blood you inject it to the blood you make antibodies in your blood the virus isn’t
infecting your blood it’s infecting your mucosa and you don’t produce any iga to neutralize it in fact recent studies have shown that the vaccinated especially with the delta variant and the unvaccinated have similar amounts of virus in their nose and throat
in barn stable massachusetts the cdc tracked an outbreak of 469 cases of covid . . . 74 occurred and fully vaccinated and 4 out of five of those hospitalized were vaccinated . . . all right so maybe they are mandating this because they just didn’t know with the covid and so my main complaint is with our health agencies in the cdc who basically know better and are misleading the public
so let’s look at dtap which the scientists in the cdc have known since 2014 that the acellular pertussis vaccine does not prevent people from getting infected with the pertussis bacteria and passing it to others in fact it was never designed to do that the vaccine was designed to neutralize the pertussis toxin pertussis we know it as whooping cough it can be fatal for children under six months so neutralizing this toxin saves lives all right i’m not going to debate that but what it doesn’t do is neutralize the bacteria so what happens is fully vaccinated children go to daycare they pick up that bacteria and they come home and they give it to their newborn brother or sister they get deathly ill and they go to the hospital hopefully our medical professionals are able to save them but who do they blame now the cdc is blaming anti-vaccers for the limitations of this vaccine design i suggest that they be transparent and tell parents that although it is preventing severe disease in their children it is not preventing transmission because we have created a whole class of asymptomatic pertussis carriers who are increasing the disease
now the old dtp vaccine that many of you who are my age or older got did prevent transmission when we switched to the safer acellular version they knew that it was never designed to prevent transmission it was safer it had less adverse advance but pertussis cases have gone through the roof there’s a resurgence in pertussis because of the design of the vaccine and the vaccinologists know this they’re trying to address it and so we cannot mandate that something that does not prevent transmission
all right what about the flu vaccine well they have shown that basically it there’s no difference there’s no statistical difference if you’re vaccinated or unvaccinated whether you get the flu or not but it’s even worse because although the first year it is somewhat effective it’s about 65 percent effective at preventing symptoms in you after that it actually has negative efficacy
and i want to address this because it’s very important vaccines are made to a specific variant and when that variant mutates the vaccine no longer recognizes it and so it’s like you’re seeing a completely new virus and because that’s so you actually get more severe symptoms when you’re vaccinated against one variant and then it mutates and then your body sees the other variant so there’s the potential and the science shows that in fact with the flu if you get vaccinated in multiple years you are more likely to get severe disease you are more likely have more viral replication and you are more likely to be hospitalized both in adults and in children we are seeing the same thing in covid with the delta variant and so we are mandating that people get a vaccine that could actually make them more sick when they’re exposed to the virus
in fact this week a paper came out and what it showed is that with this delta variant when you’re vaccinated your body makes antibodies that are supposed to neutralize the virus but they were supposed to neutralize the old variant when they see this new variant what they’re doing is they’re actually the antibodies are taking the virus and helping it infect the cells all right that science was just published this week we need to be looking at the science and we need our policy to reflect the science and we
also need it to reflect our rights okay and so as a phd who knows the science i’m in the category of the most vaccine hesitant group yes phds are the most vaccine hesitant followed by people who have less than a high school degree because they know what they don’t know and they don’t trust their government and many people
the other group that is very vaccine hesitant are african-americans 70 percent of african-americans have not taken this vaccine why because they don’t trust their government do they have reason not to trust their government well between the years of 1930 in 1970 the cdc conducted the tuskegee experiment where they took untreated males with syphilis and they refused to treat them even after antibiotics became available they still did not treat them and they did not tell them that they had syphilis they told those people that they were there to secure their health and they did not secure their health they abused them
you say well that was in the past although i don’t think 1970 was that long ago while in 2012 whistleblower william thompson came forward and said we published a study that said mmr does not cause autism but we lied in fact we shredded data that showed that when black boys are vaccinated on time they have increased rates of autism diagnosis and we shredded it and we left it out of the paper as an african-american and a phd i want to ask each of you are we going to exclude 70 percent of african-american people from the workforce and from education
all right my ancestors did not work this hard i come up from a family that worked very hard and i’m very aware that my privileges are dependent on the work of my grandmother and my great-grandmother and i have great respect for these people that put me where i am and yet you’re telling me that my son will not be able to be educated if based on the history of african americans in this country that he doesn’t want to be vaccinated
all right so i will leave you with that question who are we going to exclude from the workforce are we going to segregation in the united states of america
thank you
Links which support testimony above:
Related reading:
The Good News—A COVID-19 Update. Thomas T. Siler, M.D.
The Bad And The Ugly About COVID In America Thomas T. Siler, M.D.
From a doctor bewildered at where all this COVID stuff is going
Steve Karp, MD
Scapegoating the Unvaxxed By Sally Zelikovsky
