Typical, perhaps of”reporting” by certain ’news outlets’, this story raises unanswered questions; i.e. Did the Bruce family receive any compensation when the city exercised eminent domain? (Also, do certain Native American tribes have a claim prior to the “Bruce family’s”?)
A landmark law signed by California Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) on Sept. 30 provided for a seaside park in Manhattan Beach to be returned to the Bruce family, which owned the land before the city used eminent domain to seize it in 1924. The victory was hailed as a watershed moment, the first example of Black people forcing the return of property that was taken from them by one means or another, often violently, over the years.
At the same time it raised a question: Would the Bruce’s Beach case be a one-off, or a tipping point in a national struggle over Black land ownership? Activists and scholars say there are other similar cases nationwide, but proving them — and getting the current property owners to cooperate — will be a different matter, forcing another chapter in the nation’s racial reckoning and raising thorny questions about how to right past wrongs.
“The reason it’s getting so much attention now is there’s been a precedent set and that’s what’s giving hope to other families,” said Kavon Ward, who helped lead the successful fight on behalf of the Bruce family and has co-founded a group called Where Is My Land aimed at advocating for other Black people who are trying to reclaim lost and stolen land. “This is just the beginning.”
dlh
BUT WAIT!
Hard science says so-called indigenous peoples were not so indigenous after all, or at least not assuredly so. It is not really known who was here first, as if that makes a difference as to ownership and eminent domain, but leftist doctrine says Europeans are interlopers yet pretty much every “indigenous” tribe was, and not shy about conquest either.
