Category Archives: JUDICIARY

Massachusetts Justice

Posted on August 14, 2019 by Designated2

“Aiding and abetting”? NO! Not if it is a liberal judge in a liberal state. This story is pretty straightforward. By any sane definition, a legally determined immigration lawbreaker is ordered/allowed by a “judge” to be snuck out of the … Continue reading →

Posted in JUDICIARY, UNCATEGORIZED | Comments Off on Massachusetts Justice

Out of bounds judges — and candidates

Posted on September 7, 2015 by Designated2

The judge, refused to authorize bail which is outrageous as the County Clerk’s  demeanor has been respectful and conscientious in pursuit of her legal case Same Judge Bunning ordered students who opposed homosexuality to be re-educated Kasich no conscientious objection … Continue reading →

Posted in CAUCUS / CONVENTIONS /PLATFORMS, JUDICIARY, PARTY & CANDIDATE INTEGRITY, RELIGION AND GOVERNMENT, UNCATEGORIZED | 1 Comment

Are Republican leaders up to the task, or are they limp ducks?

Posted on November 21, 2014 by Designated2

Republican Leaders Urge Restraint The Limp Duck Congress Reading this overnight piece from Eliana Johnson at National Review:  Republican Leaders Urge Restraint “A McConnell aide seemed to rule out entirely the possibility of thwarting nominees put up by the administration. … Continue reading →

Posted in IMMIGRATION, JUDICIARY, REPUBLICAN VS DEMOCRAT, UNCATEGORIZED | 1 Comment

Retention Vote for Judges — It’s Your Choice

Posted on October 30, 2014 by Designated2

We have been asked to repeat our post providing what background information we have on judges appearing on the ballot in Scott County.  Here is the link to that September 30th post. Judges on the Ballot What does the poster … Continue reading →

Posted in JUDICIARY, REPUBLICAN VS DEMOCRAT, UNCATEGORIZED | Comments Off on Retention Vote for Judges — It’s Your Choice

Walton, Sullivan, Roberts: the Three Amigos of “no-nonsense” justice

Posted on October 27, 2014 by Designated2

If conservatives are looking to the courts for justice, I’d suggest, go to Wimbledon; you’re not likely to get it in our current legal/judicial system (note to Democrats who may have stumbled onto this site by mistake: “Wimbledon”, you know … Continue reading →

Posted in JUDICIARY, REPUBLICAN VS DEMOCRAT, UNCATEGORIZED | Comments Off on Walton, Sullivan, Roberts: the Three Amigos of “no-nonsense” justice

On the One Hand . . . On the Other Hand

Posted on July 23, 2014 by Designated2

James Geraghty of National Review Online fame writes today in his Morning Jolt column with the same trepidation we had about yesterday’s Obamacare decisions (also iterated in our comment section by Gus): Obamacare Will Probably Bounce Back with an ‘En … Continue reading →

Posted in HEALTHCARE POLICY, JUDICIARY, UNCATEGORIZED | Comments Off on On the One Hand . . . On the Other Hand

Two Obamacare Court Decisions –

Posted on July 22, 2014 by Designated2

The “letter of the law is important” and “no it isn’t . . .  presidents get to write in whatever they want and Congress gets to shirk its duties.” Two three-judge appellate court panels issued rulings today regarding the permissibility … Continue reading →

Posted in HEALTHCARE POLICY, JUDICIARY, UNCATEGORIZED | 2 Comments

Courting of Unanimity Has Costs

Posted on July 7, 2014 by Designated2

June’s end of term unanimous Supreme Court Decisions regarding buffer zones and recess appointments may have embarrassed some on the left but conservatives should be a little circumspect. This article from Patriot Post explains why the effort at unanimity can … Continue reading →

Posted in JUDICIARY, UNCATEGORIZED | Comments Off on Courting of Unanimity Has Costs

Flash: New York Times AND Hobby Lobby Have First Amendment Rights . . .

Posted on July 1, 2014 by Designated2

Liberals astounded, . . .  Ginsburg and Pelosi apoplectic . . . This article from Robert P. George, writing at First Things provided the inspiration for our headline.  What Hobby Lobby Means How we got here—and where we’re headed   The … Continue reading →

Posted in JUDICIARY, RELIGION AND GOVERNMENT, UNCATEGORIZED | Comments Off on Flash: New York Times AND Hobby Lobby Have First Amendment Rights . . .

SCOTUS McCutcheon Decision Helps Political Parties

Posted on April 3, 2014 by Designated2

RNC helps insure victory for free speech The Republican National Committee (RNC) was co-Plaintiff /Appellant in the case of McCutcheon v. FEC, the First Amendment case that Democrats and their liberal media mouthpieces are hyperventilating about this week.  We congratulate … Continue reading →

Posted in JUDICIARY, REPUBLICAN VS DEMOCRAT, UNCATEGORIZED | Comments Off on SCOTUS McCutcheon Decision Helps Political Parties