We are the drain the swamp people

• Well, at least by what we include in our selection of commentaries
  
• The Corona that staggered Wall Street
• Or was it near beer?
• Ironically, alcohol can kill coronavirus (on surfaces anyway)
• Folks, the flu kills, always has
• Graphics posted herein not part of articles referenced

Nevertheless, there is cause for concern and response, but get sober people!

The very credible Elizabeth Vaughn at RedState writes

NYU Professor Notes Coronavirus May Be ‘Bi-Phasic like Anthrax’, It’s Time to Press the Chinese for More Answers

Via Market Watch:

Coronavirus fatality rates vary wildly depending on age, gender and medical history — some patients fare much worse than others   

Excerpts from the American Spactatror article by Daniel J Flynn:

That Which Does Not Kill Us Makes Us Dumber 
There’s no cure for panic and hysteria.

Symptoms of the coronavirus abroad include sneezing, coughing, fever, and breathing difficulties. Here in the United States, the disease, apparently mutating, displays different symptoms. They include exaggeration, panic, and overreaction.

San Francisco declared a coronavirus state of emergency despite not a single confirmed case among the city’s residents. Why not include yellow fever and polio in the state of emergency just to stay on the safe side?   . . .

Currently, at least outside of China, the disease primarily afflicts politicians and journalists. The symptoms grow worse for those in front of a camera or microphone, and especially bad for those — gulp — touching a keyboard. Stock holders appear most greatly plagued by the virus.

The latest CDC update shows just 14 cases in the United States atop 45 cases among repatriating Americans unfortunate enough to cruise on the Diamond Princess ship or visit Wuhan itself. In other words, the disease kneecapping the stock market and shutting down a Facebook conference in California in May afflicts 0.0000042 percent of the American population. The number of Americans killed by the Wuhan coronavirus falls even below that minuscule fraction to zero.

One cannot even call the coronavirus endemic to any area in the United States. Yet, speakers affix “epidemic” and even “pandemic” to coronavirus even though two countries, China and Korea, house 99 percent of cases. In just three other countries, Japan, Italy, and Iran, do cases reach into the triple digits.

“As of Feb. 26, 2020, the flu is showing much more of an impact on Americans than COVID-19,” Dr. Lisa Lockerd Maragakis, the senior director of infection prevention at Johns Hopkins, points out. She estimates coronavirus deaths at 2,770 worldwide and “0 deaths in the U.S., as of Feb. 26, 2020.” On the other hand, she writes that the flu causes between “291,000 to 646,000 deaths worldwide” and “12,000 to 61,000 deaths in the U.S.” annually.

Hers reads like the voice of science, soberly using facts and figures throw water rather than gasoline on the flames. Sure, even the Spanish flu outbreak of 1918, which boasted a kill percentage eerily close to the coronavirus’s 2.5 percent, started with just a few cases. And it is likely more Americans acquire this condition and that some die from it. But treating every bug that catches on somewhere in the world as the end of the world does much harm and little good. Panic is not preparedness.

People in positions of responsibility act so irresponsibly regarding public health matters precisely because they wish for the public to not hold them responsible. If coronavirus does not kill thousands of Americans, they can claim their warnings defeated the disease. If coronavirus does kill thousands of Americans, they can say they told us so. It’s a win-win for them.

But this disease of the bureaucrat, call it CYA, stokes fear rather than instills calm. It’s terribly reckless, as the 2,000-point decline in the Dow Jones Industrial Average over the last week indicates. Whole industries, including transportation and tourism, suffer not because of prudence but because of hysteria. Zero American deaths and 14 cases within our borders do not justify turning the country into the Animal House parade scene after the Deathmobile’s arrival.      . . .

In the mean time will a capitalist effort overcome evil of a socialist state ( the latter by intent or indifference)?

Jerusalem Post today:
Israeli scientists: ‘In a few weeks, we will have coronavirus vaccine‘
Once the vaccine is developed, it will take at least 90 days to complete the regulatory process and potentially more to enter the marketplace.   . . .

It will be an oral vaccine, making it particularly accessible to the general public, Zigdon said.

“We are currently in intensive discussions with potential partners that can help accelerate the in-human trials phase and expedite completion of final-product development and regulatory activities,” he said.

As to the stock market reaction to pandemic fears, well I hope some bastards lost a lot but the bastards never do, they instigate but take no significant hit as they sell, or they see the reaction and sit it out, maybe even buying.  Or maybe it is just a good time for a market correction, and an reason will do. As Trump said it is a buying opportunity.  Now I wish I had some money to invest!  Unfortunately the Corona beer ad campaign won’t help them.

Related reading:

Vietnam Insider:

https://vietnaminsider.vn/wuhan-coronavirus-seems-to-have-a-low-fatality-rate-most-patients-make-full-recoveries/

0

0

• Hanson on the nomination of “Get-off-my-grass” Sanders (great line by Hanson) but the others are effectively just as mean spirited and sinister
  
• As to Gorka – We should indeed investigate,  push back, keep hope for justice alive against the deep-state. At least bankrupt the bastards with legal fees which is a key technique they use against political enemies.  But cleaning house has to come straight away (done expeditiously it would have curtailed much of the cred-seeking BS from the Obama holdovers).
• One can have little confidence in the reliability of the current DOJ or jury pool in DC producing Grand Jury indictments.

The following commentaries earlier this week from Victor Davis Hanson and Sebastien Gorka are as to be expected insightful, and in their way hopeful. Their full text is available at American Greatness (links and excerpts below) . We do not disagree with the thrust of the articles.  Rather, in Hanson’s case, we miss a statement we think appropriate  — recognizing that the nomination by the Democrats of  anyone but Bernie could ultimately be worse for the country, a fear we set forth below. And in Gorka’s case — we question the presumption that Durham’s work, conceding all genuineness, could not be thwarted by DC Grand Juries.

Victor Davis Hanson writes:

NeverSanders?  

His policy nostrums are frightening. He cannot take criticism, but becomes gruff and animated. And he is a different sort of septuagenarian than is Trump, who has a sense of humor and can be self-deprecating. Get-off-my-grass Bernie, like most true-believers and fellow travelers of mandated government redistribution, is serious 24/7. He never really addresses criticism, and his fallback position on any issue is always another predictable socialist bromide, a frown and two frail arms flailing in the air.

Again, Sanders the person gives the Sanders agenda no boost. All that can be said of Sanders is that he is authentically socialist in a way that candidates like Pete Buttigieg and Elizabeth Warren are only so occasionally and opportunistically.

In 2020 if Sanders is the Democratic nominee, the NeverSanders movement will be far larger, far wealthier, far more influential—even as it is likely far quieter—than were the vociferous but anemic NeverTrumpers of 2016.

ANY Democrat who receives the nomination has already been so compromised by campaign statements, vote buying, etc., and hate for all things Republican, that they would be forced to aggressively populate government with the most doctrinaire elements of the Bernie Bolsheviks. From postal worker to cabinet level and with such a victory would come the Congress. There is only a narrow band of degrees of horror in a Democrat victory at this stage.

From Sebastian Gorka, also at American Greatness

The Counter-Coup Has Begun 

If God blesses us again and President Trump is reelected this November, it would be nice to have people working for the man chosen by the American voters to lead them and upon whom we don’t have to use lie detectors.

We have great concern that Durham will not get very far with actual convictions operating in a DC venue. Trials of nationwide crimes, crimes against the electorate ought not be limited to the DC area. Indictments in such matters ought to be able to come from a system without bias as to Democrat innocence and Republican guilt. A Grand Jury is hardly a jury of one’s peers anyway but the pool ought to more represent America than DC group-think and that point is especially true for trial juries and judges.  The Roger Stone miscarriage is an example of Beltway justice.

0

0

The following commentaries about the Democrat debate last night in South Carolina are worthy as they give us the flavor of the evening’s proceedings.  While they make some insightful observations and prognostications, some are arguable, even irritating.

At The Federalist by Brian Linville (excerpt)

Why Bernie Sanders As Democrats’ Nominee Would Be Best For The Country
Better to gird for the fight against socialism now than to put it off to another day .

If, on the other hand, Sanders is the nominee and goes on to lose badly, the centrists in the Democratic Party will have an opportunity to reassert themselves. In this, Sanders’s defeat could be a repeat of George McGovern’s landslide loss to Richard Nixon in 1972. In the aftermath of that election, Democrats reckoned with the results, recognizing that radicals had taken the reins of the party. Moderates then took charge to shepherd a return to electoral viability. A similar reaction post-Walter Mondale in 1984 led to Bill Clinton’s election in 1992 as a centrist.

Such a Democratic shift would certainly improve their prospects in future elections. It would also incentivize Republicans to hew closer to the center. Both parties, shocked by the populist insurgencies of Trump and Sanders, would be compelled to reckon with the unsavory results of the post-Cold War neoliberal consensus that enriched coastal elites while leaving much of the country behind.

We Must Crush Socialism to Maintain Stability

One of America’s great strengths throughout history has been the domination of our politics by parties of the center-left and center-right. When power changes hands, the shift is subtle. This stability is critical for businesses and households to make decisions about what the future will look like, and it has enabled our enviable record of sustained growth. The results for nations who alternate between far-left and far-right governments are much less impressive — looking at you, Argentina, and much of the rest of Latin America for that matter.

We would ask Mr Linville to please identify the “far right” – who is their candidate – what are their positions – what is inimical about their positions —  are they in any way plausible candidates?   The article, while good in some respects, creates straw men of no political consequence for purposes of making a useless point. We know the far-left candidates.  They are real. They are each of the Democrat candidates driven there by the relentless logic of big government.  We also know that the center- left and to some extent the center-right element he refers to (unnamed as well)  only serve to ratchet up expectations and dependence on government.

Reading more about the Dem debate this morning:

Winners and Losers of the South Carolina Debate

At RedState by Joe Cunningham — His commentary plays up Amy Klobuchar, which we find shortsighted, as in oblivious to her being as ultimately radical as the rest, by vote record and stated position, a matter here and there simply being more nuanced.  They are all inextricably on the same glide path.  Implicating one as moderate in any way is not useful or insightful.

Also at RedState, this one by Bonchie:

Debate Reaction: Elizabeth Warren’s Strategy Becomes Crystal Clear

Plausible, based on the description of the proceedings, Warren now maneuvering for Vice-President slot on Sanders ticket.

0

0

Re: the Super Bowl of politics and toilet bowl of performances

From a blog posting by Chastity Clark — actual quotes from Michelle O

0

0

• Oh, and did I mention…she’s the descendant of SLAVES!

MICHELLE IN ’20!: TAKE IT TO THE BANK

At Veritaspac, We’re Sticking With Our Early Prediction; A ‘Brokered Convention’, The “World’s Most Admired” Black Woman with The ‘Obama’ Last Name Answering the Call

She’s the one who is ‘Proud of her Country” Only When An Obama Runs It

Whether or not the Democratic Party’s ‘fears’ seem well-founded or not (that Bernie will be the nominee), we’re sticking with our prediction that Michelle Obama will emerge from the 2020 Democrat convention as the party’s 2020 presidential nominee.

As radical as Bernie, we believe, Ms. Obama has been aggressively sold to the American people as something of a “moderate’. Party faithful, however, know better.

The Barack Obama presidency did not appear to be as radical as Senator Sanders’ agenda, but, given another term, it most certainly would have turned viciously radical leftist. Obamacare, the way it was misleadingly packaged and forcibly enacted is just a hint of where Obama and the “progressive” Democrats want to go.

Trump is seen by the most extreme of the Dems as a “temporary” pause in the accomplishment of their agenda.

Bernie is being too obvious for the cautionary strategists of the party. He is tipping their hand before they’ve secured the Oval Office and both Houses.

In Michele, they see the ‘answer’, which should be so obvious to everyone…the GOP, the voters, the media (we think the MSM DOES know).

The way we see it unfold is that Michele Obama, and her still closeted strategists and supporters, will remain silent, until the convention except to continue the relentless ‘warnings’ about Bernie.

In the meantime Sanders will continue his seemingly unstoppable march to the nomination. Behind the scenes, we believe, Oprah, the old Obama machine, Barack, and all of the old true believers in the “wonders” of the Obamas will be working on Michele’s ego and the need to protect, restore, and continue Barack’s legacy. (Success with her ego won’t be too difficult to achieve.)

Bottom line, when one considers how “beloved” Michelle is, by the entire Democratic party, all the former Barack allies, the entertainment, academic, and media sectors; a “super” best selling book (“Becoming”), a Netflix ‘propaganda’ contract, her ‘youth’, voted the “World’s Most Admired Woman”, THE FIRST WOMAN PRESIDENT (!!!)…how can she not be prevailed upon, and be the ‘reluctant savior’ to ‘rescue’ the Progressive March begun by her ‘sainted soul mate’, and, be forevermore “proud” of her Country?            dlh

————————–
Sampling of the “mix” of competing views on the race for the Dem nomination:

From Breitbart News:

House Majority Whip James Clyburn (D-SC) said Sunday on ABC’s “This Week” that Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT), who he described as a socialist, as the presidential nominee in 2020 could put the Democrats majority in House of Representatives in jeopardy.

Clyburn said, “A lot of people think so. I do believe it will be an extra burden for us to have to carry. This is South Carolina, and South Carolinians are pretty leery about that title socialist.”

He continued, “So I think that that would be a real burden for us in these states or congressional districts that we have to do well in. If you look at how well we did the last time and look at the congressional districts, these were not liberal or what you might call progressive districts. These are basically moderate and conservative districts that we did well in, and in those districts, it’s going to be tough to hold onto these jobs if you have to make the case for accepting a self-proclaimed Democratic Socialist.”

A Wall Street Journal editorial (2/24):

Democrats are waking to the prospect of a nominee who wants to eliminate private health insurance, raise taxes on the middle class, ban fracking and put government in charge of energy production, make college a taxpayer entitlement, offer free health care to illegal immigrants, raise spending by $50 trillion, and tag every down-ballot Democrat with the socialist label.

All of these are political vulnerabilities, but Republicans shouldn’t be too sanguine that Mr. Sanders would be an easy November mark. A majority of Americans aren’t socialist, at least not yet, but the country is closely divided politically. Democrats and the media will close ranks behind Mr. Sanders as an alternative to the incumbent.

Mr. Trump might also make the election a referendum on himself—meaning his personal behavior and character—rather than the socialist agenda. That’s an election Bernie Sanders could win. Democrats have little time left if they want to offer the country a better choice.

0

0

Bernie Sanders Surges Toward Nomination With Nevada Blow-Out  (excerpt) (image not in original)

By endorsing single-payer health care, the radical Green New Deal, “free” college tuition, a $15 federal minimum wage, and the abolition of the Electoral College, Sanders has now made his left-wing progressive ideas the mainstream platform of the Democratic Party.

With a major win in Nevada, Sanders is on track to steal South Carolina from Biden’s safety net and sweep through Super Tuesday, when just more than a third of the delegates in the entire primary will be awarded. While Sanders might not capture every delegate, a strong performance may catapult Sanders to winning the 1,991 delegates needed to fend off a brokered convention in July.

Former New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg, however, looms large as one of the main wild cards poised to shake up the primary. Bloomberg has dumped more than $450 million into his presidential effort since making the late-entrance leap into the race in November. With a Forbes estimated net-worth of $61.9 billion, Bloomberg has no shortage of campaign cash to drown out his opponents on the airwaves and strip delegates from Sanders in the subsequent March primary states.

Davis: Bloomberg Spent Half A Billion To Get Scalped By A Fake Indian  (excerpt) (image not in original)

“We’re getting to see in real time whether a candidate with no charisma, no real rationale for running, no base of support, can actually buy a nomination,” Davis said. “And I gotta say, I was kind of amazed. I think [the debate] may have been the first time in television history we saw a guy pay half a million dollars to get scalped by a fake Indian.”   . . .

Davis said that in 2016, the Democratic establishment stole the nomination from Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., and he believes that same establishment might be using Bloomberg to shamelessly stop Sanders again.

“If you look back at 2016, the Democrat establishment decided that they were going to make sure that Bernie Sanders wasn’t going to win the nomination, so they rigged it. And at least then they had enough shame and good sense to kind of hide it. And I think here in 2020 what we’re seeing is whether the Democrat establishment is going to use a billion dollars of someone else’s money, namely Mike Bloomberg’s, to steal the nomination from Bernie Sanders,” Davis said.

Davis concluded by pointing out that Bloomberg’s name won’t appear on the Nevada caucus ballot, yet the Democratic National Committee (DNC) allowed Bloomberg to appear on the Nevada debate stage.

“Even in Nevada, where Mike Bloomberg isn’t even on the ballot. Somehow, the DNC decided that he got to be up there on that [debate] stage,” Davis said.

By the way . . .

0

0

Lou Dobbs is correct in his criticism (referenced below) of William Barr. Many conservatives applauded the selection of Barr to lead the DOJ after the corrupt and inept and lawless leadership of Eric Holder and Loretta Lynch. Barr was seen as the incorruptible, super-competent guy who has the courage and background to come in and clean up the gross politicization and corruption that the Justice Dept. and the FBI had suffered over the entire length of the Obama terms in office.

People would be held accountable for their criminal and unconstitutional behavior, Trump would be fully vindicated, the confidence of the American people in their federal law enforcement apparatus would be restored.

So, a year later, besides a bit of ‘tough talk’, what has Barr accomplished? Almost nothing.

And the formidable John Durham, the ‘greatest prosecutor of all time’, what has he been doing? He’s starting to make John Huber look downright “Elliott Ness-like”.

It’s been, what?, over a year ago that Trump authorized Barr to publicly release the documents and other information that would reveal to the American people the full story of how the DOJ/FBI tried to overturn the presidential election of 2016! The information which would result in guilty parties to be held accountable. Where is it?

Our question…does Bill Barr have a calendar. Does he know there is a presidential election in little more than 8 months? Does he realize his failure to get the job done for which he was selected could result in a successful civilian coup and the end of the American Republic?

I hope not, but so far, Barr has not lived up to the great expectations that the American people had for him.       dlh

At RedState with Stu Cvrk commenting:

There has been much ado about something this week, as the Democrat-media complex and over 2,000 Democrat hack former DoJ prosecutors have demanded the resignation of AG Barr for “politicizing the Dept of Justice.” That’s rich, because DoJ was politicized by Democrats loooong before Bill Barr assumed duties as US Attorney General on 14 February 2019. It wasn’t Barr’s DoJ that defrauded the FISA court in order to orchestrate an illegal counter-intelligence operation on a Republican presidential candidate and later president of the United States.

The Democrats seek to thwart, disrupt, and/or bury the criminal investigations into Obama-era DoJ, FBI, and intelligence community activities. But do they really have anything about which to worry? Lou Dobbs conducted an “annual review” of AG Barr’s accomplishments over the past year on his program Thursday night and found them to be wanting. Here is what he had to say:

Dobbs: The matter at hand is none other than the man who we faithful few we once believed would be a large indispensable force for good in saving the Republic – William Barr. Barr has been AG for a year now. And we have little in the way of material accomplishments for which Barr would be applauded. In fact, his recent conduct and statements border on the senseless.

Barr has treated us to the spectacle of the number one law enforcement officer in the land – a man at the center of solving and resolving the greatest political scandal in our country’s history – whining and whining publicly about what is apparently the greatest challenge he believes he faces in the storm that rages in the nation’s capital. That is, not the venal shape shifters of Congress, or most prominently the poisonous chimera Speaker Pelosi nor her nasty apprentice Adam Schiff. Nor is it the helminths [parasitic worms] who reside throughout our permanent bureaucracy, the Deep State within.

No, the great affront to Barr at this moment seems to be none other than his own boss, the President. Not the treacherous radical Dems, not the RINOs who are as subversive of our President as they are supportive (and you never know which way they will be), not the leftwing national media who are servile accomplices of any swamp creature of either party, of any ideology or interest so long as they seek to undercut or cut asunder President Trump. Get a grip, Barr! Look clearly!

Barr’s complaint against the President amounts to this. The Attorney General took to old media, that is ABC News, to whine that his boss was making his job tougher because his boss habitually takes to the new media – that is Twitter – to talk directly to the American people, and yes, to give his opinion as well.

The Attorney General is wrong on several counts, including taking on his boss in public. And then the stories that he’s thinking about quitting unless the President quits tweeting. That’s just a dumb ultimatum. Dumb because it’s classless, and it won’t work. Ultimatums rarely do. And the President has the constitutional duty and authority to run the Justice Dept. It’s time for the Attorney General to deliver on his mission – clean up the rancid, politically-corrupt Justice Dept and the FBI. They’re both crooked at the top, and the American people won’t stand for more political corruption.

And yes, Mr. Attorney General, you’d better be fighting for this President because he is the only one in Washington who’s been certified to be absolutely clean, without crime or corruption by the DoJ and the Senate. Get back to work. Too many of us have put our faith in you and John Durham for you to flag or fold. Go after the damn bad guys, and stand up for the President who is the only one who deserves your loyalty along with of course every one of our fellow citizens.

End of Dobbs’ commentary. Now one could argue that Barr has done a FEW things, including (finally) announcing that federal law enforcement will go into sanctuary cities to apprehend illegal aliens, as well as farming out the reviews of politically-sensitive cases to federal prosecutors outside of Washington DC. But in the main, Dobbs’ chastisement of AG Barr is correct. Not a single Spygate perpetrator has been indicted, and indeed DoJ declined to prosecute two of the key players for admitted lying and leaking of classified information to the media. And going public in the legacy media to complain about the President’s tweeting – as opposed to simply picking up the phone and complaining directly – was indeed classless.

0

0

Ms. Peggy ‘loved’ the Democrat debate last week!

“It was hands down, the best presidential primary debate…maybe in decades!”

Now, Me? I thought the debate was the complete product of those wily “Russ-kies”:

They have always had it in for Democrats, especially that little ‘peregruzka‘ Hillary.  And remember when they induced Hillary’s speech-writer to coach a little mimicry into her delivery  (we are sure Ms  Peggy loved this speech as well):

Wow, does that Putin know how to put on an American election…and get his ‘good buddy’, Donald Trump, re-elected…or what?!

– – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – –

As ‘everyone knows’, Putin and the Russians are busily interfering in the U.S. presidential election again…and,. again, they are working like soviet beavers to ‘force’ the American people to vote for ‘Putin’s guy”, Donald J. Trump !

The debate this past Wednesday must have been Putin’s best effort so far. It was a classic Russkie mind control experiment.

Think of it, and wonder how they made it looks so easy to get some 65-70 million patriotic Americans to see the Democratic party’s entire lineup of candidates for the party’s nomination look so disagreeable, intellectually as well equipped as a bag of nails, personally unpleasant, inexplicably arrogant, shockingly smug, and many of them more suited for ‘high office’ in an assisted living facility.

For good measure, in an effort to confuse things, Putin and his comrades made the party’s own most dedicated disciples think that half their lineup was just in the race to fill out their ‘bucket list’ in the time left to them. One guy, who usually looks like “Back to the Future’s” Christopher Lloyd, is depicted as striving to take the country back to another time  when communism flourished in Hollywood!

Of all the appealing females the Party could have called upon to represent their gender in the 2020 race, the Russkies had the Dems showcase one of the most unlikeable frauds to ever appear in a campaign ad trying to look like ‘just a regular ol’ beer drinker’ (“Ah think  ah’ll have me a beer”)!

Finally, those shifty soviets even went so far as to successfully plant a story  in a Wall Street Journal column by a writer nearly as duplicitous as themselves…Ms. Peggy!  

Congressperson Schiff, call your office, the Democrats have just provided all the evidence you need to prove that Putin is working for Trump!   dlh

——

“To me, Elizabeth Warren won the night. She was good, hot and sharp right out of the box. ” Peggy Noonan, 2/22/20 

0

0

Maybe a little spite

0

0

• So much to feed on last night for Republican ads
• Democrats must agree with conservatives, they use our attack lines against themselves
• Bloomberg to Sanders ~~ you are a communist ~~  Buttigieg calls Sanders v Bloomberg “Burn this party down vs. buy this party out.” ~~ Sanders to Bloomberg ~~ you have two stints too  ~~ Sanders to oil and gas states ~~ you can thank me for saving you ~~ and so much more**

In a normative America the Democrat debate last night in Nevada should have have sealed it for Trump’s reelection.  What should be mortal wounds were inflicted (some self-inflicted).

We understand, we are not in normative times exactly when essential, incremental and me-too Marxists dominate a party aspiring to run the country without inhibition.  But it was delicious to watch clips of the brawl last night and to read  the delightful reports from conservative commentators paid to watch.  Truly they enjoyed their work.

Below are a few links that provide the flavor.  One of our favorite summations was by Donald Trump, Jr. who tweeted with regard to Bloomberg’s bludgeoning tomahawking by Liz Warren:  (link is to clip of her doing so and Mikey’s dazed and staggered response). Perhaps we witnessed a coup de grâce, but then again, money buys body parts as Bloomberg the Planned Parenthood financier well knows.

From Donald Trump, Jr.

It was a “short” campaign. https://t.co/w4nRYk9ma6  

For your reading and viewing pleasure:

Elizabeth Warren Ends Michael Bloomberg’s Campaign at Nevada Debate

Cunningham’s take (below)  may be generous to Biden, regardless, it is pretty bad when the “winners” are the ones who were not always in the way of the intended death blows. There was plenty for us to be delighted about.

Winners and Losers of the Las Vegas Democratic Debate

The Best Tweets Of The Las Vegas Democratic Debate 

Democratic Debate Becomes A Blood Sport In Nevada

*Nevada Proving Grounds

**these are not direct quotes, rather, intended as the essence

0

0