We are the drain the swamp people

Info via Breitbart.  Annotations by V’PAC

Cackle                                        Warlock                                         Northy

Only three Republicans have not signed onto Lindsey Graham’s resolution (see previous post).

Sen. Murkowski’s office told Breitbart News that the senator has yet to review the Graham resolution.  (V’PAC calls bullshit– she is waiting for reaction back home or quid pro quo, don’t give her any of the latter)

Senator Mitt Romney — seriously – you Republicans in Utah are not overrunning his offices!?

Senator Susan Collins did not respond to a request for comment from Breitbart News

We believe there are two or three Democrats that could be induced to support the resolution out of pure survival instinct.  But please no quid pro quo.

0

0

Forty-three Republicans (not the full compliment) and no Democrats have signed onto the following resolution put forth by Lindsey Graham.  Not quite sure of the politics behind the particular wording but so be it.

S.Res.378 – A resolution expressing the sense of the Senate that the House of Representatives should, consistent with long-standing practice and precedent, prior to proceeding any further with its impeachment investigation into President Donald J. Trump, vote to open a formal impeachment inquiry and provide President Trump with fundamental constitutional protections.

Speaking of charades:

Let me guess – your a Republican voter trying to get the stink off for saying anything nice about Romney?

Anyway, a total of 44 Repubs are on board as of this writing including both Iowa Senators.

The Republican Senators who have not signed on as yet are:

Lisa Murkowski (AK) (given her family experience with politicized prosecutions you would think she would be first to sponsor)

Cory Gardner (CO)

Johnny Isakson (GA)

Susan Collins (ME)

Rob Portman (OH)

Lamar Alexander (TN)

Mitt Romney (UT)

Mike Enzi (WY)

Some of these might be out of town or something if that is how it works. But is anyone surprised by Mitt Romney or Susan Collins?  The phone number to call should include Democrats as a test of any sense of fair-play

Stop This Charade!  Gary Bauer writing at Campaign for Working Families:

As we told you yesterday, Senator Lindsey Graham and Majority Leader Mitch McConnell have introduced a resolution calling on the House of Representatives to respect precedent and due process by ending this current impeachment charade.

I am pleased to report that the resolution, S. Res. 378, has 43 co-sponsors.
 
Frankly, every senator should be able to support this resolution.  Every senator, regardless of party, should be outraged by this sham process.
 
Impeachment is one of the most profound responsibilities of Congress.  It literally threatens to overturn an election, invalidating the votes of tens of millions of Americans.  It is absolutely imperative that transparency be paramount in any impeachment effort. 
 
Adam Schiff’s Star Chamber process, where the president cannot confront his accusers, is unacceptable.  The Graham-McConnell resolution makes it clear that this travesty should not continue. 
 
The kangaroo court being deployed in the House is offensive to the notion of justice.  This is not a pursuit of the truth but a pursuit of smears. 
 
Harvard Law Professor Alan Dershowitz, a self-described “liberal Democrat” who defended Bill Clinton against impeachment and who voted for Hillary Clinton, is now accusing House progressives of “seeking to weaponize the Constitution for partisan purposes” in this outrageous impeachment charade.
 
The rule of law depends upon due process — on the legal safeguards that protects everyone, including the President of the United States.  The inmates at Guantanamo Bay prison have been afforded more due process rights than this partisan witch hunt has offered President Trump.
 
ACTION ITEM:  Call your senators now at 202-224-3121.  Politely, but firmly, urge them to co-sponsor the Graham-McConnell resolution, and to call for a quick vote and passage to send a clear message to the House leadership that it must respect precedent, due process and the will of the American voters. 

0

0

• Want to see naked pictures of your congressperson dancing with a bong? 
• We turned down Nadler and Loebsack
• “But I am Bi-polar” (look for that as her excuse for trouple err three-way, err binary and trinary behavior with underlings and without)

Katie Hill becomes first female lawmaker to face House ethics inquiry over sexual relationship after naked photograph leaked
——
– “Inappropriate Relationship”?! This is a big resume’ enhancer and will likely propel this fresh person congressperson (gender pronoun unknown) into a US Senate seat! (Watch for”U.S. Sen. K. Hill (D-LGBTQ)”.

– “Shocking”(?) photographs of Democrat Katie Hill posing naked with a tattoo of what appears to be a Nazi-era Iron Cross on her bikini line”!?

– If you think the tattoo on her “bikini line” is shocking, you ought see the tattoo over her “ground zero”…”abandon all hope ye who enter here” (only a rumor, you understand).

– Kyrsten Synema (AZ)* was elected to the Senate in 2018; she “claimed” to be that body’s “first openly bi-sexual” member! Move over, Kyrsten! Katie Hill has the pictures to prove her status!

– A “throuple”??? That would be a first for Congress…wouldn’t it? (“Texts and photos between Hill, Heslep and Desjardins reveal their throuple was steamy at first, but ended with Hill leaving them ‘high and dry’ (“high”?, and “dry”? )

– And the media thought it was just ‘impeachment testimony’ going on in Adam Schiff’s “SCIF” (Sensitive Compartmented Information Facility )????         dlh

Washington Examiner article continues:

Rep. Katie Hill, the subject of a new House Ethics Committee inquiry over an alleged relationship with a staff member, is the first female lawmaker to face such a charge.

The first-term California Democrat denies she ever had an inappropriate relationship with her legislative director, Graham Kelly, as alleged by her estranged husband, Kenny Heslep. The pair are in the midst of divorce proceedings, and Heslep also alleged that he, Hill, and a staff member on her successful 2018 campaign for a northern Los Angeles County seat were engaged in an intimate relationship, including explicit photos that appeared on the conservative site RedState.

Hill admitted Wednesday night to having an affair with a campaign worker and promised to work with the House Ethics Committee.

Dozens of House members have been involved in Capitol Hill sex scandals, but to date, they’ve all been men. Members of both parties have been implicated. (Read more in link provided above.)

Daily Mail article

Shocking photos of Congresswoman Katie Hill are revealed showing off Nazi-era tattoo while smoking a bong, kissing her female staffer and posing nude on ‘wife sharing’ sites

• • Katie Hill, 32, has been seen in a series of shocking photographs obtained exclusively by DailyMail.com
  • Hill was pictured kissing and brushing her young female staffer’s hair, who DailyMail.com can identify as Morgan Desjardins from Santa Clarita, California
  • The then 22-year-old began a throuple relationship with Hill and her husband Kenny Heslep shortly after she started working for Hill in 2017
  • Texts and photos between Hill, Heslep and Desjardins reveal their throuple was steamy at first, but ended with Hill leaving them ‘high and dry’
  • The congresswoman was also seen posing naked while smoking a bong on 9/11 in 2017, as a tattoo of a Nazi-era Iron Cross on her bikini line is on full display
  • The tattoo could open the congresswoman to accusations of hypocrisy, after she criticized racist Facebook posts that included a similar-looking cross
  • Sources revealed Hill and Heslep also posted Hill’s naked photos online in 2016 under a thread called ‘WouldYouF**kMyWife’ and ‘wifesharing’

Shocking photographs of Democrat Katie Hill posing naked with a tattoo of what appears to be a Nazi-era Iron Cross on her bikini line while smoking a bong and making out with her young female aide have been obtained exclusively by DailyMail.com

The congresswoman, 32, was also pictured naked brushing the young woman’s hair, who DailyMail.com can identity as Morgan Desjardins, 24, from Santa Clarita, California.
Desjardins began a relationship with Hill and Heslep shortly after she started working for Hill in 2017, before the three-way affair broke down this summer when Hill told both her husband and her lover that she wanted to focus on her work.

Hill’s wild lifestyle has been laid bare in a cache of texts and intimate photographs obtained by DailyMail.com, as sources revealed Hill and Heslep also posted her naked photos online under a thread called ‘WouldYouF**kMyWife’.

0

0

• Republicans demand transparency

While numerically inferior (as House Republicans are) they can win the day by massing in a  phalanx or closely packed (sometimes angular) formation to confront the numerically superior force and in doing so push back, scatter and even overrun the numerically superior enemy (Democrats).

In grandiose terms that is sort of what Representative Gaetz of Florida did yesterday, leading at least a couple dozen fellow “Spartans” out to protect America  from the Democrat assault on fair play and the entire electoral process in their ruthless activities to unseat President Trump.

Gaetz et al did America’s bidding by entering a closed meeting run by extreme partisan Democrats in order to call attention to the egregious lack of transparency, and due-process of the Democrat deep-state orchestrated star-chamber proceedings.

The Gaetz web site listed 40 as supportive, although it could be that all did not participate.  It should be noted that it appear to us that Kevin McCarthy was part of the effort although not listed. Good for him. Double check the video clip below to be sure. We did notice Minority Whip Steve Scalise and Iowa’s own Steve King.

The following members plan to be in attendance: House Republican Whip Steve Scalise and Congressmen Jim Jordan, Mark Walker, Andy Biggs, Lee Zeldin, Mo Brooks, Mark Meadows, Kevin Hern, Paul Gosar, Steve Watkins, Debbie Lesko, Russ Fulcher, Buddy Carter, Steve King, Bill Johnson, Fred Keller, Brian Babin, Ken Buck, Michael Waltz, Ralph Norman, Louie Gohmert, Mark Green, Carol Miller, Vicky Hartzler, Alex Mooney, Jeff Duncan, Drew Ferguson, Gary Palmer, Jody Hice, Duncan Hunter, Ross Spano, Bradley Byrne, David Rouzer, Markwayne Mullin, Randy Weber, Pete Olson, Ron Wright, Scott Perry, Greg Murphy, and Ben Cline.

Following the clip are some links to related commentaries. Video takes 30 seconds to load because I was asleep at the start switch.

Via Twitchy:

Rep. Matt Gaetz leads Republican ‘phalanx’ into the House SCIF to protest closed impeachment proceedings 

Gee, what changed? Remember when media firefighters gushed over congressional Dems’ sit-in? 

Related (Republicans demand transparency)

Devin Nunes and Kevin McCarthy say John Ratcliffe ‘destroyed’ Taylor’s argument. Why won’t Adam Schiff release the transcript

Mark Meadows on the leaks of Bill Taylor’s testimony: ‘The FULL transcript should be released immediately’

GOP House members disrupt Trump impeachment inquiry   (Reuters description of events)

Even though they are in the majority, the Republican Senate apparently needs a “phalanx” — just muster the “manhood” to seize the day and proceed with transparent examinations of the coup attempt that has been going on by the deep-state  — are you listening Leader McConnell ? Judiciary Chairman Graham?

0

0

• Trump calls for Republicans to get tough
• Rush calls namby-pamby Republicans to task, tells them its for their own good and the good of the country
• Today Rep Gaetz leads a charge “phalanx of Republicans” to “sit in” at secret hearings on impeachment and demand accountability and transparency (more on that in later post)

Yesterday we referred to Rush Limbaugh’s inspiring open remarks on that day’s program. Here they are from his transcript.

It’s Not Hard to Defend the President Because of Who’s After Him!   
Oct 22, 2019

. . . Every Republican in that town ought to be in unison defending Donald Trump, and, if they can’t do that, could they at least attack the Democrats? Because it’s one and the same thing. Donald Trump has four Republicans, maybe five, if you count all of those in the House and Senate who routinely stand up for him. The rest of them cower in fear, send out tweets, show up on Fox News, wring their hands, worry about this and that, not realizing the genuine existential battle that we are all in.

The Democrats are coming for every Republican in that town just as they are coming for Donald Trump, and somehow the Republicans in that town still don’t see it, still think they can escape the line of fire. And all they have to do is stay silent on Donald Trump and all of these meanies trying to destroy Trump will magically leave them alone.

It’s not hard to defend Donald Trump. You don’t even have to defend Donald Trump. But you do have to get on board and understand what we are in. We are in a war. There aren’t any bullets flying, but there is a war. The war is over what kind of country this is gonna be for your kids and grandkids and my nieces and nephews. That’s what this is about. You can smile all you want, but that’s exactly what this is about.

And the fact that so many Republicans don’t want to choose sides or have failed to grasp that that’s what this is about is frustrating beyond my ability to express it. And they’ve got this convenient excuse, “I can’t defend what the president says. I can’t defend the constant use of the word witch hunt.” You can’t defend the president’s use of words? Stop and think of how insignificant that is compared to what is at stake. “I can’t defend the president’s words. I really can’t defend the president’s mannerisms here.” What?

You can’t even muster yourself to criticize this total sham that Adam Schiff is running? Adam Schiff is now not even letting Republicans read the transcripts of his sham hearings that he’s conducting in private, in the basement. Adam Schiff is the biggest scam artist to come down the pike in this Congress. This guy is making up what witnesses say. If they don’t say what he wants, he leaks sentences of theirs out of context, the media runs with it gladly, and an entirely different picture than what is really happening in these little hearings or interviews is being portrayed to the American people through the media.

And every Republican in the House of Representatives knows this. They all know what Schiff is doing and five or six of them have, I don’t know what, the courage or guts to show up and try to explain what Schiff is doing. “It’s just so hard to defend Donald Trump.” Yeah, and it was really hard to defend George W. Bush. Yeah, and it was really hard to defend Ronald Reagan. Yeah, and it’s really hard to defend me. It’s really hard to defend Republican under attack, it seems. Why?

Why is it so damn hard? Why are there always fewer

than 10 people willing to defend any high profile Republican or conservative attempting to make real change by opposing this socialism from the left, why is that so hard? “Well, because, Mr. Limbaugh, the comments are so off the wall and uncoordinated and insignificant.” It’s chump change compared to what’s going on!

What we really face here when you get right down to it is Donald Trump versus the United States government, that is, if you want the parameters, if you want the boundaries, the definitions of what this is. We call it the deep state, we call it the administrative state, we call it the ruling class, the Washington elites, whatever, it’s the United States government and everybody in that town.

And they have created one of the grandest illusions that many of us are just now beginning to figure out. And the grand illusion is that they are competent. The grand illusion is that they know what they’re doing. The grand illusion is that they’re obeying the Constitution. The grand illusion is that they’re doing everything they’re doing for the American people. The grand illusion is that only people like them are qualified and capable of running this government.

If you’re not troubled by the fact that what really is happening here is that the entirety of the United States government is attempting to outdo, overturn and reverse the election results of 2016 — and what does that mean? Your vote doesn’t count! And they’re not stopping until they pull this off.

And there’s one man trying to stop them from doing this, the guy that happened to win the election. Somehow he’s the problem. I’m not talking about with you, of course. I’m talking about with Republicans who just can’t seem to find a way to defend the president. It’s so hard.A lot of people raised a good point, where’s Lindsey Grahamnesty? Where is he? He’s got a Senate committee that he runs, Judiciary Committee. He could be subpoenaing people, he could be demanding to see — he could be doing in the Senate what they’re doing in the House except he could be doing it to the people that ran this phony investigation into Trump. He could be tracking them all up there. And people ask, “Why isn’t he doing anything?”

And you know what the popular theory is? The popular theory is that he’s got cold feet about doing this because it would implicate Senator McCain, one of his great friends. And it may be true. John McCain was at the epicenter of the Steele dossier’s dissemination. John McCain was one of the leaders in the effort to get Trump and his election reversed and thrown out of town using the Steele dossier and any investigation of this is going to demonstrate this. And many are theorizing that Lindsey Graham just doesn’t want to see Senator McCain’s name dragged through this kind of mud, so there’s no investigation.

Then Senator Grassley tweeted out something. Senator Grassley tweeted out he’s worried about this Horowitz guy, the inspector general. We’re supposed to get the IG report in May, if anybody remembers. And then we were told, “Well, it can’t come out in May because Barr started his investigation and the IG can’t come out before Barr finishes.”

So, okay, then so then we were gonna get it before the end of August. And then we were gonna get it at the beginning of September. Then we were gonna get it last Friday. Then we were gonna get it this Friday. And Grassley’s saying, we may never get it! Horowitz may be his own deep state guy. The idea that this inspector general somehow is gonna turn on the Washington establishment? Grassley is saying this. Senator Charles Grassley’s throwing dirt now on the IG. I’m not sure we’re gonna get anything from this guy, and he may be right. Why the delay? Obviously because of who it would implicate and what he’s found.

The deep state’s not gonna turn itself in, and the deep state’s not gonna expose itself, and the deep state is not going to indict itself. The deep state’s not gonna put itself on trial, and it sure as hell isn’t gonna convict itself and put itself in jail. And Grassley says that I think this guy Horowitz, the inspector general, he’s a deep stater. My term, but Grassley means ruling class deep stater guy.

I don’t know, folks. This is not hard to me. Defending Donald Trump is defending the American people that voted for him. Defending Donald Trump is defending America. Defending Donald Trump is not defending whatever personality quirks and characteristics you don’t like about Donald Trump. That’s just a convenient excuse not to defend him. That’s a convenient excuse not to defend the people that voted for him.

It’s a convenient excuse, a cowardly excuse not to defend this country against this undeniable onslaught by a radical socialist left that is attempting to erase the founding of this country as it reconstitutes or transforms America. How the hell can you not defend against that?

But, see, it’s not just Trump. They didn’t want to defend George W. Bush. Hasn’t this been a constant refrain that we always ask, “Where are the Republicans?” Every day there’s an onslaught from the Drive-By Media and the Democrats coordinated against whatever Republican happens to be really effective at that moment. And there isn’t any — hell, unified. There isn’t even any significant defense.   . . .

0

0

Seeking #hastag ideas for names of Twitter accounts for various Democrat personages:

Breitbart offering “vintage” Pierre Delecto collector items.

Twitter names submitted by “Fast Eddie from Michigan”:

#Weekender (Bernie)

#Moonbeam (shared by Andyang and Maryang)

#Headscratcher (Amy K)

#Goback (Julio)

#Axl (Beto…with all due respect to Axl Rose of Guns ’n Roses fame)

——–

Twitter name submitted by “GUS”:

Beto- “#Harry Eers”

0

0

We couldn’t agree more with Senator Paul on this one

We thought Senator Richard Burr, nominal chairman of the Senate Intelligence (talk about a misnomer) Committee (that’s the one run by the ranking Dem member, Mark Warner) was the most ineffective, duplicitous GOP committee chairman in memory, but Senator Graham seems to be giving him a run for his money…or someone’s money.

Sadly, we thought Lindsey Graham was a staunch conservative now that he was no longer under the influence of John McCain. As incoming Chairman of the Judiciary Committee, and based on his very admirable performance in the Kavanaugh hearings, we expected that Graham would provide a very effective counterweight to the insane House impeachment travesty.

But…nothing…hasn’t subpoenaed witnesses,  such as the various State Dept. Anti- Trumpers that Adam Schitt has tried to exploit, etc, etc

Does Senator Graham have an agenda, well-hidden, that conservatives and supporters of the GOP president don’t know about?     dlh

Related reading:

Senator Rand Paul Calls-Out Chairman Lindsey Graham for Doing Nothing Except Protecting the “Deep State”…

Posted on October 21, 2019by sundance*
Finally….. Senator Rand Paul directly calls-out Senator Lindsey Graham, Chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee for doing absolutely NOTHING.  At a certain point it becomes necessary to accept willful blindness for what it is…. Senator Graham wants to protect the Deep State more than Senator Graham wants to protect a constitutional republic.

It’s worth noting that Senator Rand Paul’s statement comes out at the same time Senator Lindsey Graham has said he will support* the impeachment of President Trump as soon as the articles reach the Senate for trial.

From The Daily Torch (Americans for Limited Government)  — Robert Romano writing

Sen. Lindsey Graham must call the anonymous CIA so-called whistleblower to testify if the House impeaches President Trump  (excerpt)

By now, it is perfectly clear that House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) has absolutely no intention of affording any due process to President Donald Trump or any member of the executive branch called to testify in her quest to impeach and remove the President from office. . . .

But the House is just one body. The Senate is completely in control of its witnesses in an impeachment trial, and does not have to play by those Pelosi-imagined rules that part ways with all modern cases of impeachment. It can — and must — provide the due process that Pelosi and House Democrats are depriving the nation of. . . .

Rule VI of the Senate’s states clearly, “The Senate shall have power to compel the attendance of witnesses, to enforce obedience to its orders, mandates, writs, precepts, and judgment, to preserve order, and to punish in a summary way contempts of, and disobedience to, its authority, orders, mandates, writs, precepts, or judgements, and to make all lawful orders, rules, and regulations which it may deem essential or conducive to the ends of justice.”  . . .

This is not some kangaroo court or some trivial matter, after all, this is about whether to overturn an election via legislative means. Instead, Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Lindsey Graham should send a strong message to Speaker Pelosi that he intends to specifically allow for the questioning by all parties of any and every witness the House uses, including the anonymous whistleblower and whoever in Congress or on staff helped write his memo.

Rush’s opening statement today was superb and to the point

Every Republican ought to be defending Trump

If they can’t then they should at least be attacking Democrats.

We will excerpt  his opening comments after the transcript is posted

* Reading the linked USA Today article — in fairness Graham was a little more nuanced than sundance gives him credit  for —  sundance allowing only a pull quote that  ‘he will support’.

0

0

• Mitt admittens to be Carlos Danger Pierre Delicto
• Chosen tag uncomfortably close to what a gay porn star would choose

Now that we have a “Pierre Delicto” in the US Senate (AKA Mitt Romney) , maybe we should explore how many other currently prominent legislators and presidential candidates are “twitter lurkers”. Some that we consider possibilities:

Tulsi Gabbard- “#OllieGark”

Cory Booker- “#CornPop” (from his days as big time gang leader in Scranton, PA)

Kamala Harris- “#PussyGalore” (from the James Bond movie, “Goldfinger”)

Adam Schiff- “#AceVenturaPetDetective” (currently investigating the disappearance of the mysterious ‘whistleblower’)

Liz Warren- “#SacajeweaLovesCoors”

‘Pete’ Buttigeig- #BrideofChasten”

Joe Biden- “#RockyBalboa”

What are your “twitter nominees”?         dlh

0

0

Americans Will Wonder…Why Didn’t Trump’s Party Defend Him?

Waiting for Godot

Our concern is as it has always been. If the documents and factual data supporting all the allegations we have heard regarding the treacherous criminal actions of the leadership of the FBI, the entire National Security apparatus, and the Obama administration, including Obama himself, which attempted to elect Hillary and, failing that, conducted an ongoing illegal effort to overthrow the 2016 election, isn’t released very soon, it won’t matter.

Since this past spring, hardly a week goes by that we don’t hear that the anxiously anticipated Inspector General’s report ‘s release is “imminent’…within days!

And, nearly every day we get a report from John Solomon or Hannity or various conservative talk shows or blogs that AG Barr has “uncovered new evidence”…that former NSC and FBI leadership had carried out illegal activities against Trump’s campaign, administration, and presidency.

Documents allegedly “proving” the worst criminal allegations against Hillary for her obstruction and careless handling of confidential information and the commission of serious federal crimes by key figures in the law enforcement and criminal justice agencies have been supposedly forwarded to those very agencies for review ‘to insure’ that public release will not ‘compromise security’. President Trump has promised to release those documents and was expected to do so months ago. But, he is waiting…on the sound advice of people like Christopher Wray.

Who’s Doing the “Confidential Review”…Susan Rice, Strzok, Christopher Wray…Comey????

When, even ‘if’, those documents are released there is a question whether or not they will be so “redacted” by the very agencies which have attempted to stonewall their release, as to make them useless in the public and political arena. Their process of review and “vetting” has been dragged out so long, the fear is (at least on our part) that the process will continue to be extended until after the 2020 election, thus making the entire exercise “academic”.

While “Deep Staters” are doing their “review”, former top officials, some of whom were determined to be “less than candid” in their interaction with investigators, are at CNN and MSNBC every day getting their “story out”; some are writing books, making speeches, appearing frequently on talkshows and leftist political forums.

Findings from secret congressional ‘investigations’ are ‘leaked’ and reported on widely; every statement and action by the president is reported on in a negative fashion, often not even accurately.

Where Are The Damn Documents?

Unless those documents and all the ‘proof’ we’ve been led to believe is being and has been uncovered is put out to the media and the public soon, the 2020 election may well be decided by the distraction and very dubious information generated by the radical left Democratic party in congress…the “secret” testimony, the highly suspect “leaks” of information supposedly coming out of those secret sessions.

Where’s Lindsey Graham? As Chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, why has he not issued “subpoenas”, scheduled ‘hearings’?

While the Republicans in congress and the ‘investigators’ in the Executive branch continue to dawdle and allow the Deep state to inundate the American people with false and misleading information, a view of the Trump administration is being formed and will soon become firmly ‘set’.

And America will wonder…why didn’t Trump’s Party defend him?   dlh

**************************************

Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s (D-Calif.) office on Monday released a “fact sheet” detailing allegations against President Trump amid House Democrats’ ongoing impeachment inquiry.

excerpt:
“President Trump has betrayed his oath of office, betrayed our national security and betrayed the integrity of our elections for his own personal political gain,” the document argues.

It goes on to list what Pelosi’s office calls proof of a “pressure campaign” and “cover up” by Trump related to Ukraine. The sheet includes quotes from Trump and the anonymous whistleblower who filed a complaint regarding Trump’s July 25 phone conversation with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky in which he pressed for an investigation into former Vice President Joe Biden and Biden’s son, Hunter.

0

0