Delusional Romney in a Snit

SNIT ROMNEY 

and around and around and around

“I want my vote back, Mitt. Give me back my vote.

“In 2012, I voted for this insufferable establishment icon, this inept goof who the Democrats wish every Republican would emulate. Some nights, I wake up sweating and screaming when I relive it in my nightmares. I should have taken my ballot, lit it on fire and flushed it down the Schiffhole.”

What a delicious opening for an opinion column that exposes and skewers the REAL Willard “Mittens” Romney.

“Mittens” is the GOP Establishment’s answer to the sad old hag, Hillary What’ser name. Romney still can’t figure out what happened to all his ‘fans’ in the liberal media who loved him so when he was carrying out their agenda in Massachusetts while posing as a “conservative Republican”.

I could not more emphatically endorse columnist Kurt Schlichter’s opening, “I want my vote back, Mitt. Give me back my vote.”        DLH

We championed Romney as nominee after supporting Santorum in the primary. It was out of the will to believe and the assurances of trusted people Romney brought or bought onboard when it was clear he would be the nominee and efforts needed to be consolidated. Certainly Newt Gingich was acceptable . More so it was a situation of who our opponent was –  Barack Obama. Anybody but him.  But talk about ego, Romney confused that with a  people being enamored with him.  Now that is delusional.

It is indeed another craw-cleansing column by Schlicter  – highly recommended.     R Mall

Posted in UNCATEGORIZED | 1 Comment

Peggy Noonan of the lace-curtain Irish

Appearing after DLH’s posting yesterday, Eric Georgatos writing at American Thinker provided a compelling answer to Peggy Noonan (our bête noire because she represents snide-ville NeverTrumpers) — listing ten or more major scandals* by the Obama regime while Noonan carries on hysterically (and we are not talking the funny sort) about Trump. Georatos concludes as to why Trump has support from average-Joe America — disgust with the political system.

Probably most of all, I resent the hell out of a media and a Republican Party that would do absolutely nothing about any of these things because Barack Obama was the first President of color, and so these elites decided to pat Americans on the head, tell them to shut up with their concerns, and understand that Obama gets a free pass to destroy this country in the name of transforming it in accord with his leftist ideology.  In President Trump’s words, this is b*****t.  We the people are not too stupid to see what was done, and we don’t forget who did it.

So as the evidence started to come out of the Obama/CIA/FBI/DOJ coup attempt against candidate Trump and then President Trump—and any moderately intelligent and objective observer knows that the evidence has continued accumulating and is now overwhelming and irrefutable in establishing the complete corruption and dishonesty of a federal government totally weaponized  against the incumbent’s political opponents and under the direction of Barack Obama—then, yeah, Peggy, I have gone from cautious tolerance of President Trump to a 1,000% Trump supporter; I despise the ruling class behavior of both parties in DC; I respect President Trump as a fighter and disrupter of an absolutely rotten, entrenched elite and I don’t care what he tweets in furtherance of calling these people out.  And I will join tens of millions of Americans in massive outrage if the House dares to use Coup Hoax 2.0 to vote for impeachment and/or the Senate votes for conviction and removal.

Peggy, I hope you can wise up.  You’re in perfect touch with the ruling class; you are wildly out of touch with the American people.

We would add that Noonan strikes us as liking to play shanty Irish roots or maybe “cut-glass” roots like some Hollywood starlet playing the fan-magazine crowd when she is now of the lace-curtain variety sucking up to her WASP betters.  The irony is that Trump is more comfortable with shanty/cut glass-Irish people and values than she is, and they with him!


* a compelling list — read the entire article here

Eric Georgatos is a former corporate lawyer who operated the Brushfires of Freedom blog from 2008-2016 (a book of top postings from the blog is available at America, Can We Talk?).

Posted in UNCATEGORIZED | Comments Off on Peggy Noonan of the lace-curtain Irish

Waiting to read the Peggy Noonan column condemning egregious activities against Trump

  • OK that would be like waiting for Nancy Pelosi to pen one
  • Peggy does not realize that for Dem’s to follow her advice it sets up a lose-lose for the yellow-dog anti Trumpers of whatever party

Peggy Noonan at WSJ

The Impeachment Needle May Soon Move…

“But the subject matter will probably have to be bigger than the Ukraine phone call, which is not, as some have said, too complicated for the American people to understand, but easy to understand. An American ally needed money, and its new leader needed a meeting with the American president to bolster his position back home. It was made clear that the money and the meeting were contingent on the launching of a probe politically advantageous to Mr. Trump and disadvantageous to a possible 2020 rival.

“Everyone gets it, most everyone believes it happened, no one approves of it—but it probably isn’t enough. People have absorbed it and know how they feel: It was Mr. Trump being gross. No news there.”

The Impeachment Needle May Soon Move...OR AT LEAST MISS PEGGY HOPES SO !

The seriously ‘shop-worn’ Peggy Noonan has never been more excited about a cause than she is about this one…the impeachment and removal from office of President Trump.

As far as Peggy ‘the once great in her mind’ Noonan is concerned American voters have made only one good decision since Ronald Reagan…and maybe she’s even doubtful about that one. The American voter shared this has-been’s ‘wisdom’ only when they sent Barack Obama to the Oval Office.

But then they relapsed again, in Noonan’s view, when they failed to maintain all the positive economic and foreign policy momentum of the Obama years by not electing Hillary Clinton.

There are a lot of sleazy “never-Trumpers” out there but none who more believes that 60 million Americans who didn’t agree with her are irredeemably stupid, as the aging has-been Noonan does.

Her latest is unremarkable in that it is just another column ‘artfully’ attacking Trump and not so subtly touting Nancy Pelosi as a supreme ‘statesperson’.

In this column Peggy attempts to advise the Democrats on how to properly impeach Trump and ‘cleanse’ the White House before those darn ignorant hill billies out there in middle America go and elect him again!     DLH

Noonans latest supportive advice to the Dems: (Annotations by R Mall set apart)

“The mood has shifted against Trump, but the House has to show good faith and seriousness.” 

Her pleading to do it right, but there are so few such bones in that political body

Things are more fluid than they seem. That’s my impression of Washington right now. There’s something quiet going on, a mood shift.

Impeachment of course will happen. The House will support whatever charges are ultimately introduced because most Democrats think the president is not fully sane and at least somewhat criminal. Also they’re Democrats and he’s a Republican. The charges will involve some level of foreign-policy malfeasance.

We are dumbfounded by her insight as regards her last statement — it reminds us of the Woody Allen line about when he was asked if he had read Tolstoy’s War and Peace — he responded – yes. its about Russia”.

The ultimate outcome depends on the Senate. It takes 67 votes to convict. Republicans control the Senate 53-47, and it is unlikely 20 of them will agree to remove a president of their own party. An acquittal is likely but not fated, because we live in the age of the unexpected.  

Our DLH fears there are enough pathetic Republicans in the Senate, which is always possible, but there are lot of evidentiary and political cards yet to be played –  and because this is a political battle and nothing else —  there is a large war chest that we would advise Trump to begin using now to his best advantage.

Here are three reasons to think the situation is more fluid than we realize.
First, the president, confident of acquittal, has chosen this moment to let his inner crazy flourish daily and dramatically—the fights and meltdowns, the insults, the Erdogan letter. Just when the president needs to be enacting a certain stability he enacts its opposite. It is possible he doesn’t appreciate the jeopardy he’s in with impeachment bearing down; it is possible he knows and what behavioral discipline he has is wearing down. 

Ms Noonan never gets weary of Democrat “daily craz”y – their phoniness — hypocrisy – the “fights and meltdowns, the insults”  and thinks the American people do not either — that is a key problem for the Dem’s

The second is that the Republican leader of the Senate, Mitch McConnell, told his caucus this week to be prepared for a trial that will go six days a week and could last six to eight weeks. In September there had been talk the Senate might receive articles of impeachment and execute a quick, brief response—a short trial, or maybe a motion to dismiss. Mr. McConnell told CNBC then that the Senate would have “no choice” but to take up impeachment, but “how long you are on it is a different matter.” Now he sees the need for a major and lengthy undertaking. Part of the reason would be practical: He is blunting attack lines that the Republicans arrogantly refused to give impeachment the time it deserves. But his decision also gives room for the unexpected—big and serious charges that sweep public opinion and change senators’ votes. “There is a mood change in terms of how much they can tolerate,” said a former high Senate staffer. Senators never know day to day how bad things will get. 

Noonan is incredibly oblivious to the prospects that with a  trial by Republicans being entirely fair, it would entail all manner of testimony,  cross-examinations and the likely injection of material into the public record that Democrats, if they proceed with impeachment, will regret. The sober ones, the ones not imbibing with Noonan on a regular basis,  know that and will counsel to avoid impeachment. Tables can be turned.

The third reason is the number of foreign-policy professionals who are not ducking testimony in the House but plan to testify or have already. Suppressed opposition to President Trump among foreign-service officers and others is busting out.

Bring it. Quite a few might have to be subpoenaed from jail which they rightly deserve for their national security lapses, Russia hoaxing FISA abuse, etc., and  others will risk exposing their culpability for their egregious and actionable activity.

The president is daily eroding his position. His Syria decision was followed by wholly predictable tragedy; it may or may not have been eased by the announcement Thursday of a five-day cease-fire. Before that the House voted 354-60, including 129 Republicans, to rebuke the president. There was the crazy letter to Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan, which was alternately pleading (“You can make a great deal. . . . I will call you later”) and threatening (“I don’t want to be responsible for destroying the Turkish economy—and I will”). 

The whole matter was an ongoing tragedy but because of Trump’s diplomacy in the form of pursuing economic punishment rather continuing to risk the blood of those there in a militarily token capacity — individuals Noonan apparently prefers risking as triggers for more American blood to be spent for non-allies. Our longstanding Kurdish allies are in Iraq and are not other than by bargain  the Syrian or Turkish Marxist Kurds. And then Peggy Noonan must think shucks —  peace broke out. Noonan thinks she understands the situation there but as heretofore articulated, her thinking is of the depth and nature and emotionalism that whatever Trump does must be wrong

There was the Cabinet Room meeting with congressional leaders, the insults hurled and the wildness of the photo that said it all—the angry president; Nancy Pelosi, the speaker of the House, standing and pointing at him; and the head of Gen. Mark Milley, the new chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, bowed in—embarrassment? Horror? His was not the only bowed head.

And of course Peggy believes the pre-planned walkout by Pelosi, her witchiness, would not rate a disgusted bowed head by Gen. Milley.  Trump bad , everyone else noble.

The president soon tweeted about a constitutional officer of the U.S. House, who is third in line for the presidency: “Nancy Pelosi needs help fast! There is either something wrong with her ‘upstairs’ or she just plain doesn’t like our great Country. She had a total meltdown in the White House today. It was very sad to watch. Pray for her, she is a very sick person!”

As the Democratic leaders departed, he reportedly called out, “See you at the polls.” Mr. Trump is confident that he holds the cards here—he’s got the Senate, and the base of the party says all these issues should be worked out in the 2020 election. But he is seriously weakening his hand by how he acts.

BUT NOT THE UPRIGHT DEM’s!!

That meeting will only fortify Mrs. Pelosi’s determination to impeach him.
The president tweeted out the picture of that meeting just as the White House made public the Erdogan letter—because they think it made the president look good. Which underscored the sense that he has no heavyweight advisers around him—the generals are gone, the competent fled, he’s careening around surrounded by second raters, opportunists, naifs and demoralized midlevel people who can’t believe what they’re seeing.

I’m sorry but that conglomeration constitutes Washington but gosh Peggy is in New York where all the smart people live

Again, everything depends on the quality and seriousness of the House hearings. Polling on impeachment has been fairly consistent, with Gallup reporting Thursday 52% supporting the president’s impeachment and removal. 

Here she exposes that she believes the House tormentors; Democrat propaganda reflected in polls; believes Dems should impeach; will offer advise on doing so and is fine with their current star-chamber proceedings. If the latter is not true we await her actual condemnation. She just hopes they fine tune things for appearances. 

Serious and dramatic hearings would move the needle on public opinion, tripping it into seriously negative territory for the president.

And if the needle moves, the Senate will move in the same direction.

But the subject matter will probably have to be bigger than the Ukraine phone call, which is not, as some have said, too complicated for the American people to understand, but easy to understand. An American ally needed money, and its new leader needed a meeting with the American president to bolster his position back home. It was made clear that the money and the meeting were contingent on the launching of a probe politically advantageous to Mr. Trump and disadvantageous to a possible 2020 rival.  

This analysis of course came from the Joe Biden school of interpretation and action. Even if true Trump has the treaty authority with the Ukraine to ask for help in-prosecuting wrong doing and unlike Joe Quid there was no pro-quo offered.

Everyone gets it, most everyone believes it happened, no one approves of it—but it probably isn’t enough. People have absorbed it and know how they feel: It was Mr. Trump being gross. No news there. 

Well, everyone who is anyone right Peggy?  (but see above comment)

Truly decisive testimony and information would have to be broader and deeper, bigger. Rudy Giuliani’s dealings with Ukraine? That seems an outgrowth of the original whistleblower charges, a screwy story with a cast of characters— Lev Parnas and Igor Fruman, natives of Ukraine and Belarus, respectively, who make you think of Sen. Howard Baker’s question to the Watergate bagman Tony Ulasewicz: “Who thought you up?”  (screwy story indeed)

More important will be a text or subtext of serious and consistent foreign-policy malfeasance that the public comes to believe is an actual threat to national security. Something they experience as alarming.  

The public has come to believe that, have they?  A threat to national security is  maintaining men in a volatile region to serve as springs or triggers for regional war fighting and for who or what?  Where do you start with a person who has such a head full of toys?

It cannot be merely that the president holds different views and proceeds in different ways than the elites of both parties. It can’t look like “the blob” fighting back—fancy-pants establishment types, whose feathers have been ruffled by a muddy-booted Jacksonian, getting their revenge. It can’t look like the Deep State striking back at a president who threatened their corrupt ways.

It will have to be serious and sincere professionals who testify believably that the administration is corrupt and its corruption has harmed the country. The witnesses will have to seem motivated by a sense of duty to institutions and protectiveness toward their country.

And the hearings had better start to come across as an honest, good-faith effort in which Republican members of Congress are treated squarely and in line with previous protocols and traditions.

With all that the needle moves. Without it, it does not. 

If the hearings are conducted honestly, in good faith and openly that is a loosing proposition for the Democrats as their lies, hypocrisy and treachery will be exposed. Assuming a few might have a modicum of  shame and do the right thing for their political survival there will not be an impeachment.  But if the Dems  continue on their unified course Trump will still win due to the unbelievablness of the proceedings and the Democrats will be punished at the polls. Frankly the dye is cast and they will be punished at the polls either way. That is the lose lose of Ms Noonan’s advice to the extent it involves continuing the charade at all.

Posted in UNCATEGORIZED | 1 Comment

Of course the NYT quotes McRaven — evermore the Trump basher

  • Champion of Brennan – revoke his security clearance

OUR REPUBLIC IS UNDER ATTACK FROM THE PRESIDENT

N Y Times op-ed by Admiral William H. McRaven

“But, beneath the outward sense of hope and duty that I witnessed at these two events, there was an underlying current of frustration, humiliation, anger and fear that echoed across the sidelines. .

“These men and women, of all political persuasions, have seen the assaults on our institutions: on the intelligence and law enforcement community, the State Department and the press. They have seen our leaders stand beside despots and strongmen, preferring their government narrative to our own. They have seen us abandon our allies and have heard the shouts of betrayal from the battlefield. As I stood on the parade field at Fort Bragg, one retired four-star general, grabbed my arm, shook me and shouted, “I don’t like the Democrats, but Trump is destroying the Republic!” . . .

And if this president doesn’t understand their importance, if this president doesn’t demonstrate the leadership that America needs, both domestically and abroad, then it is time for a new person in the Oval Office — Republican, Democrat or independent — the sooner, the better. The fate of our Republic depends upon it.

William H. McRaven, a retired Navy admiral, is a former commander of the United States Special Operations Command and former chancellor of The University of Texas system.

Buy all means read his entire NYT Guest Editorial. Perhaps it is possible to understand how Admiral McRaven feels…and even the “retired four-star general who believes that Trump is “destroying the Republic”. If, indeed, it were all about the Turkish-Kurdish matter.

But I believe it is also possible to understand President Trump’s view on that issue as well.
Like most Americans, I don’t believe that I fully understand the thinking on either side of the current Turkey-Kurd- Syria issue. Given the stark narrative that the Kurds were our allies in the fight against ISIS one can see perhaps, their view. Especially when so starkly simple the McRaven/”retired general” viewpoint is commonly presented. I do find , though, the entire matter is highly nuanced and very sound cases can be made for either view.

The one certainty I believe, however, is that the Admiral and the General , in my opinion, are very mistaken. And that is in their political vision.

“…the assaults on our institutions: on the intelligence and law enforcement community, the State Department and the press”??!

Really?!

What, for example, does the general who “doesn’t like the Democrats” but obviously believes the “Republic must be saved” from Trump suggest? That , though unlikeable, the Democrats will, at least, “save the republic”?

Sounds to me like a position from the recent past, usually expressed by the Obama “political generals” (as opposed to the “warrior generals”) who sought and usually won coveted military or ‘after service’ civilian appointments under the previous administration precisely because of those political positions.

Does the “retired general” McRaven refers to believe that the Obama view of the world or one by a Hillary presidency would have ‘preserved the Republic’?

In particular, was our Navy or overall military structure stronger and more formidable under the Obama ‘view’? Admiral McRaven served under Navy Secretary Ray Mabus. I’d be very interested in how the admiral would defend the “Mabus posture on the readiness and effectiveness of our Naval forces” during that period.

Did McRaven believe that that “America” was ‘not under attack’ from ‘within’?
I’ll leave it at that for the moment.     dlh ——————————————————————————————————-

Addendum, by R Mall

Is McRaven a bit of a prig, and that is why he has such animosity toward everyman’s Trump?  On that score reading his Wiki bio we see:

in 1982, as a junior officer McRaven was assigned to SEAL Team Six under the command of CDR Richard Marcinko* but was pushed out in 1983 due to McRaven’s concerns about a culture of recklessness, military discipline, and difficulties in keeping his sailors in line. Richard Marcinko fired the 27-year-old McRaven after a year. “He was a bright guy, but he didn’t like my rude and crude way,” Marcinko said. “If I was a loose cannon, he was too rigid. He took the special out of special warfare.”

Just as was true with his then superior – Cdr. Marchenko, McRaven is no doubt not compatible with Trump given McRaven’s lack of appreciation for the ways of some warriors. And that is fine.  But a good potential manager/statesman/policy influencer is able to look up the chain of command and see through any flaws for good character traits, properly evaluate policy differences and the alternatives, “see where the boss is coming from” and realize that not possessing some humility of your own, is not a recommendation for your own judgement.

But then a category of admirals and generals seem to think they got their stars by an alignment of the stars, pure merit, and are consequently deserving of deference on all matters, in spite of what their limited roll is. Indeed a military special operations mind set might not be the best strategic shot caller, the ultimate responsibility of the President.  Admirals are not elected to run the country, establish its commitments  and foreign policy and should exercise humility in that very limited roll, at least until they get elected to something beyond what often amounts to no more than the fortunes of office politics.

Reading further into McRaven’s editorial, I think lending credence to my hypothesis,  he seems not to care if a President is a Democrat or a Republican or an “Independent”. Instead his prescription for us and the world is that the United States should be policeman to the world, righting wrongs everywhere.  McCraven wrote slamming Trump:

We are not the most powerful nation in the world because of our aircraft carriers, our economy, or our seat at the United Nations Security Council. We are the most powerful nation in the world because we try to be the good guys. We are the most powerful nation in the world because our ideals of universal freedom and equality have been backed up by our belief that we were champions of justice, the protectors of the less fortunate.

But, if we don’t care about our values, if we don’t care about duty and honor, if we don’t help the weak and stand up against oppression and injustice — what will happen to the Kurds, the Iraqis, the Afghans, the Syrians, the Rohingyas, the South Sudanese and the millions of people under the boot of tyranny or left abandoned by their failing states?

Reflect on his words: “the millions of people under the boot of tyranny or left abandoned by their failing states? ” That is pretty much most of the world. McCraven is practically talking endless wars many of which would be of an escalating nature. The Admiral has some effing huge imprudences on the order of megalomania. Such military profligacy makes any Trump flaw a peccadillo. Give me Trump’s brand of imprudence any day.

Further, given what is readily known about Democrats and their policies, their “morality” McRaven as now a civilian, being indifferent to Democrats running of the country when so much of importance is at stake essentially makes you one of them. That is a disqualifying character trait in my judgement but it explains his prominence in the New York Times.

There is another glaring aspect to McRaven that indicates an important personal character flaw on his part – his judgement about people he purports to know (keep in mind he does not know Trump personally as he was gone from government service in 2014).  Consider the lying treacherous POS he personally endorsed (via Wiki):

In August 2018, McRaven expressed support for former CIA Director John O. Brennan, whose security clearance had recently been revoked by the Trump Administration. He authored an open letter to President Donald Trump in The Washington Post entitled “Revoke my security clearance, too, Mr. President”, in which he affirmed his regard for Brennan, his former colleague, and offered criticism of the decisions and personal behavior of President Trump.[28] McRaven said of Brennan, “He is a man of unparalleled integrity, whose honesty and character have never been in question … except by those who don’t know him.”

Maybe McCraven got where he got by being a bird of that feather, as ravens go, in bird group parlance sometimes referred to as a conspiracy(ironically). Given what we know about Brennan I would recommend President Trump go ahead and revoke McRaven’s security clearance for such a questionable invocation.    R Mall

*Marchenko is the author of Rogue Warrior and several management books.

Posted in UNCATEGORIZED | Comments Off on Of course the NYT quotes McRaven — evermore the Trump basher

Chris and “Chief Justice” Andy…the only true non-partisan “news” personalities left at Fox (?)

An enthusiastic Fox guy, he has a shot at replacing Shep if Chris falters

Meet the New Face of the Trump Resistance at Fox News (Bloomberg)

“Two days earlier, Shepard Smith, whose tough and factual reporting style often drew the ire of Trump and his supporters, abruptly left the network. For years, Smith served not only as Fox News’ premier breaking news anchor but also as the most prominent banner carrier for the network’s team of straight-news reporters. His abdication positions Wallace as his natural successor.”

That’s how Bloomberg characterizes ‘Ol’ Shep’…the former Fox News “premier breaking news anchor”.

The Bloomberg news service writer is obviously smitten with Shep…and certainly not so much with Fox News. The writer, ‘Gerry’ Smith (“gender, non-binary”?) suggests that with Shep gone and the ‘renowned’ Chris Wallace as the only surviving ‘master journalist’ at the network, it will not be able to claim to be a “news” network.

“Horrors !!”

That means, presumably that only CNN, MSNBC, the ‘legacy’ networks, as well as Bloomberg, of course, will be the places viewers must go if they want the ‘real’ unvarnished, honest, truthful, unbiased “news”!

Of course, “Gerry” does allow as how, if you should happen to stumble onto Fox at the right time of day and week, you can still get the straight dope from Chris Wallace, and, I would suggest, judging from “Gerry’s” writing, “Chief Justice” Andy Napolitano…the other highly objective, non-partisan “news” personality still at FNC.

dlh

*Photo not part of Bloomberg commentary

Posted in UNCATEGORIZED | Comments Off on Chris and “Chief Justice” Andy…the only true non-partisan “news” personalities left at Fox (?)

Elijah Cummings R.I.P. leaves chariots he had been riding behind, in flames

In our view, and based on impressions gained from his appearances on television and on reports, assumed to be accurate, on the actions and apparent outcomes of those actions he took as a congressman, we have long considered Elijah Cummings one of the nastiest and most negative partisans in Congress.

His passing has not changed our view but we must concede that Mr. Cummings may have believed deeply that his actions were virtuous and taken with only the best intentions.

For one can never say what is in a person’s heart nor what circumstances may have influenced one’s actions or affected their outcomes.

Thus we sincerely wish for Congressman Cummings… may he Rest in Peace. dlh

———————————————————————————————————-

Cummings, powerful congressman leading Trump probe, has died

BALTIMORE (AP) — Maryland Rep. Elijah E. Cummings, a sharecropper’s son who rose to become a civil rights champion and the chairman of one of the U.S. House committees leading an impeachment inquiry of President Donald Trump, died Thursday of complications from longstanding health problems. He was 68.
Cummings was a formidable orator who advocated for the poor in his black-majority district , which encompasses a large portion of Baltimore and more well-to-do suburbs.

As chairman of the House Oversight and Reform Committee, Cummings led investigations of the president’s government dealings, including probes in 2019 relating to Trump’s family members serving in the White House.


However justice must proceed

While the Biblical Elijah ascended to heaven in a flaming chariot Congressman Elijah Cummings left a parking lot full of flamers behind. Besides his many accusations towards President Trump that he hoped would get Trump impeached now a dumpster fire, his wife Maya Rockeymoore Cummings, chair of the Maryland Democratic Party, faces allegations of self-dealing involving “management fees” and the propriety of donations to her charity CGPS while hubby was on the House Oversight Committee.  That began heating up this past summer.

According to this Fox article:

(Rockeymoore-Cummings) charity received over $6.2 million in grants between 2013 and 2016. The report claims the nonprofit’s financial backers included Google, J.P. Morgan and Prudential – all of which had business interests before the House Oversight Committee, chaired by Cummings – and could pose a conflict of interest.

Aren’t ethics ethics Mr Chairman?   But do lecture us about the Emoluments Clause from your perch in Heaven.

Posted in UNCATEGORIZED | Comments Off on Elijah Cummings R.I.P. leaves chariots he had been riding behind, in flames

Sanctuary Fraud ?

Supreme Court Weighs State Identity-Fraud Charges Against Immigrant Job Seekers

“The Supreme Court on Wednesday explored whether states can prosecute undocumented immigrants for identity theft when they provide false social security numbers or other information when applying for jobs.

“The justices considered an appeal by the state of Kansas, which obtained convictions against three restaurant workers for using other people’s social security numbers on forms given to their employers. The state Supreme Court threw out the convictions, saying the prosecutions were pre-empted by a provision of federal immigration law that says any information submitted with federal work-authorization forms can’t be used for state law enforcement purposes.”

YOU GOT THAT AMERICA? ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS CAN USE FALSE SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBERS…FOR AT LEAST SOME PURPOSES! AS A US CITIZEN, CAN YOU? JUST ASK A JUDGE!   DLH

It would be ridiculous if states do not have coexistent authority (through statutory law) to combat fraud at the start using information that forms part of an applicants ability to work in the state. R Mall

Posted in UNCATEGORIZED | Comments Off on Sanctuary Fraud ?

His Holiness has opinions on everything*

Pope Francis: Obese Are ‘Victims of Improper Dietary Habits’
—————————————————————————————————-

THERE ARE FEW ILLS OF THE WORLD THAT IL PAPA CANNOT FIND TO BLAME ON CAPITALISM AND FREE MARKETS  –  DLH
——————————————————————————————————-

Has Pope been snacking on some capitalist treats? If somebody has a picture of this pope not displaying a corpulent ~ample~ visage please forward it

“As is his wont, the pope proposed that the problem of malnutrition and hunger are ultimately the by-products of the free market economy. “The battle against hunger and malnutrition will not end as long as the logic of the market prevails and profit is sought at any cost, with the result that food is relegated to a mere commercial product subject to financial speculation and with little regard for its cultural, social and indeed symbolic importance,” he said.

“It is a cruel, unjust and paradoxical reality that, today, there is food for everyone and yet not everyone has access to it,” he said, “and that in some areas of the world food is wasted, discarded and consumed in excess.”“To escape from this spiral,” he concluded, “we need to promote economic institutions and social initiatives which can give the poor regular access to basic resources.”

——————————————————————————————————-

First part of article:

Pope Francis: Obese Are ‘Victims of Improper Dietary Habits’
ROME — Pope Francis said that there is a “distorted relationship between food and nutrition” in the world, resulting in both world hunger and obesity, even in poorer nations.
In a message Wednesday to Qu Dongyu, Director-General of the United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), the pope said that food “is ceasing to be a means of subsistence and turning into an avenue of personal destruction.”

This means that “820 million of the world’s people suffer from hunger, while almost 700 million are overweight, victims of improper dietary habits,” the pontiff stated in his message for World Food Day.Many of these overweight people, he suggested, are found not in affluent nations but in developing countries “where they eat little but increasingly poorly, since they imitate dietary models imported from developed areas.”Francis said that these improper eating habits call for “a conversion in our way of living and acting,” which must begin with nutrition.“Nutritional disorders can only be combatted by the cultivation of lifestyles inspired by gratitude for the gifts we have received and the adoption of a spirit of temperance, moderation, abstinence, self-control and solidarity,” he said.

These nutritional virtues “summon us to a more simple and sober life, and unfailing concern for the needs of those around us,” he added.Whereas individualism and egocentrism “serve only to generate hunger and social inequality,” he said, . a “fraternal solidarity that seeks the common good” will promote a healthy relationship with ourselves, with our brothers and sisters, and with the environment.  . . .

*so many of them hypocritical


Now that it is tradition for popes to retire – afterwards (soon we hope) might His Holiness expect a gig as spokes-Pope for Weight Watchers?

Of course there is no irony in His Holiness’s pronouncements with his  rotundness, jet-setting, air-conditioned, mostly wall-enclosed nation-state ways.

So little seems sacrosanct with this pope that we wonder if a pontificate can be renamed?  Might we suggest his be referred to as the reign Pope Ignoramus I?  No?  OK you are right,. his is of a timeless quality. How about Pope Ignoramus ∞ so he can never be superseded as such.

R Mall

Posted in UNCATEGORIZED | Comments Off on His Holiness has opinions on everything*

Barr’s speech should be nailed to the ND law school walls

Updated U. of Notre Dame motto

  • It’s not like the students there would see similar scholarship coming from their Notre Dame professors
  • Tag-ons to the video of Barr’s speech says something about what is behind the abortion, China, and transgenderism mania

Attorney General Bill Barr spoke at the Notre Dame Law School Friday October 11. Barr, a practicing Catholic spoke to the Roman Catholic affiliated school on the foundational importance of morality and religion to sustain our Constitution, our way of life (the only alternative to a command and control society). We at V’PAC — imperfect sinners that we are, sometimes profane, sacrilegious by some standards —  hope we have nonetheless conveyed over time our appreciation of the necessity of maintaining the Judeo-Christian culture, its institutions and their traditional application.

That an AG would get an invitation to speak at any law school is not remarkable. That AG Barr would go to Notre Dame to delivery the particular remarks he gave is not talking to the choir (would that it was so) nor even a merely discordant one (perhaps why he agreed to go).  Notre Dame is in many ways a Fifth Column. Emanations from its abundantly liberal faculty undermine Judeo-Christian precepts (in our humble opinion of course). We believe it would be no more difficult to get defenders of traditional values at a secular university.

At Notre Dame the liberal political correctness started with President (Father) Hesburgh and is now well-established in its President (Father) Jenkins. Like theirs so many officially Catholic colleges and universities administrations have also gone out of their way to hire leftist dissidents to teach in what may have been a pathetic show of diversity but has now become a resume and tenure requirement and transmogrified those institutions. Champions of  “The Faith”, even faith, are the exception.

Barr describes a number of the assaults on religious and faith based institutions (which the Trump administration and his office are fighting). He described what we are up against – “First is the force, fervor and comprehensiveness of the assault on organized religion we are experiencing today,” said Barr. “This is not decay. This is organized destruction. Secularists and their allies have marshaled all the forces of mass communication, popular culture, the entertainment industry and academia, in an unremitting assault on religion and traditional values.” . . .

“The problem is not that religion is being forced on others,” Barr said. “The problem is that irreligion is being forced; secular values are being forced on people of faith.” As paraphrased by Terrence Jeffrey in his Townhall article that inspired our comments today: “The threat is not that the government will establish a state religion; the threat is that the state will attack people for conscientiously practicing their own.”

We would not term Barr a great orator in terms of delivery, but he is a craftsman in terms of content. On that it is a powerful speech. Nevertheless his speech (in fairness perhaps intended more as guest lecture and the certain dryness that might entail) is entirely watchable at 40 minutes in length.  At this writing we have not found a transcript, however the links below employ many quotes in their analysis of his speech.  Below the links is a video of his remarks.

Note that the video was posted by INFOWARS who issued perhaps the earliest and one of the few postings in our search. The organization has a no-holds-barred reputation to say the least. It is not on our roster of links. The editor is Alex Jones, whose delivery we were not familiar with, and seems to approach Sam Kinison in its graveliness.

Tagged onto Barr’s speech are INFOWARS’ clips dealing with several topics that run only three or four minutes each. We found their accuracy to be unassailable with the audio annotations pointed even if clumsy. That we are dealing with maniacal forces assaulting the culture is evident.

Analysis and summaries of Barr’s speech:

Bill Barr: Religious Liberty Warrior  by Rod Dreher writing at The American Conservative
AG Barr’s Speech To Notre Dame Rips The Mask Off The Progressive Agenda 
by Wes Walker via The Daily Caller

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=twJgqhjZ-HE

Posted in UNCATEGORIZED | Comments Off on Barr’s speech should be nailed to the ND law school walls

New logos for NBA and Nike

Both corporate entities now pretty much owned by Red China

LeBron to update the “Che” look

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

We have thought for quite a while now that the Nike Scythe Swoosh was missing a little something

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

LaBron doesn’t know Che, or what Red China is really like but someone told him the look would be cool.  We think it was Phil Jackson, Kareem or AOC,

 

Posted in UNCATEGORIZED | Comments Off on New logos for NBA and Nike