We are the drain the swamp people

Oh what do old dead white men know

“The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing.”― Edmund Burke

“Whilst men are linked together, they easily and speedily communicate the alarm of any evil design… They are enabled to fathom it with common counsel, and to oppose it with united strength… Whereas, when they lie dispersed, without concert, order, or discipline, communication is uncertain, counsel difficult, and resistance impracticable…. When bad men combine, the good must associate; else they will fall, one by one, an unpitied sacrifice in a contemptible struggle.”*

WHAT WILL IT TAKE TO AROUSE THE VAST MAJORITY OF ‘ORDINARY’ AMERICANS TO ACTIVELY OPPOSE THE RADICAL LEFT DEMOCRAT PARTY AS IT PROCEEDS TO DISMANTLE THIS GREAT COUNTRY?

• Maybe if those Americans were honestly informed on what is happening, it would help

• Our nation’s Judiciary and a Free Press were the ‘unbreachable’ lines of defense which were designed to protect against the evil movement which is devouring America’s values, principles, traditions, and system of true justice

• Instead, these two entities are leading the destruction of this “Beacon of Freedom for the World”!

• In a “mini-survey” of acquaintances, neighbors, and associates… all very sensible, busy, typical Americans… I was recently astonished to learn that few of them were aware of the New York state government passing a law to permit ‘infanticide’; that there was hardly any appreciation of the implications of the “Jussie Smolett incident”; and little understanding of the potentially dangerous ramifications of the relentless ‘impeachment’ efforts of the Democratic Party’s House majority.

From the moment that Donald Trump was elected by the American people, a relatively small, but powerful group of people set out to remove him from by any means possible. It was an effort begun even before President Trump’s election…before it was considered a strong possibility.

Tragically, plans and actual actions were put in place and had begun to be activated. Most tragically, those plans and actions were created by the very institutions which were supposed to protect the nation and its people from such a thing ever happening in this great nation.

Although many people now know it, , an alarming number of them refuse to believe it, many more refuse to accept such a horrific reality, and, very alarmingly, a ‘critical mass’ of evil activists actually favor the fact that the overthrow of government of the United Sates of America was conceived of and initiated by a corrupt president and his Constitutional appointees.

A further tragedy is that the entire evil undertaking was and is supported by much of the leadership of the nation’s historically most respected institutions…the Federal Justice structure, our government-run education system, and the media , in its various forms…news, opinion, entertainment.

Even more tragic yet, is the nation’s traditional ‘two political party’ system in which ideas can compete in a quest for a stronger, free-er, moral society, has been replaced by a ‘unitary’ political system devoted to a single ideological goal… absolute rule of the masses by a small elite!

When, not if, the Democrat Party succeeds in overturning the 2016 election and, in effect, overthrowing a legitimately elected government, however, it will ultimately not be due to the efforts of America’s corrupt institutions, but to the failure of “enough good people doing little or nothing”!    DLH

“The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing.”― Edmund Burke (in a letter addressed to Thomas Mercer).
—————————–***************************************—————————-
That’s the short version, attributed to Burke. A longer version reads as follows:

Whilst men are linked together, they easily and speedily communicate the alarm of any evil design. They are enabled to fathom it with common counsel, and to oppose it with united strength. Whereas, when they lie dispersed, without concert, order, or discipline, communication is uncertain, counsel difficult, and resistance impracticable. Where men are not acquainted with each other’s principles, nor experienced in each other’s talents, nor at all practised in their mutual habitudes and dispositions by joint efforts in business; no personal confidence, no friendship, no common interest, subsisting among them; it is evidently impossible that they can act a public part with uniformity, perseverance, or efficacy. In a connection, the most inconsiderable man, by adding to the weight of the whole, has his value, and his use; out of it, the greatest talents are wholly unserviceable to the public. No man, who is not inflamed by vain-glory into enthusiasm, can flatter himself that his single, unsupported, desultory, unsystematic endeavours, are of power to defeat the subtle designs and united cabals of ambitious citizens. When bad men combine, the good must associate; else they will fall, one by one, an unpitied sacrifice in a contemptible struggle.

–Edmund Burke, Thoughts on the Cause of the Present Discontents 82-83 (1770) in: Select Works of Edmund Burke, vol. 1, p. 146 (Liberty Fund ed. 1999).
*http://www.openculture.com/2016/03/edmund-burkeon-in-action.html

Franklin quote: here

0

0

I’m sure it comes across as ‘beating a dead horse’ but just between us, don’t you wonder if the conservative commentariot should again be raising the question “where the hell is John Huber?” And shouldn’t Sessions be asked what his appointment of Huber was all about? At one time, it was a big deal, and Sessions seemed to want to “reassure” that he was ‘really on the case’.

Further, what the heck has happened to the much-anticipated followup report by the Inspector General re: the Hillary investigation/outcome?

And, what about the criminal referral of various FBI “less than candid” culprits?

It doesn’t appear anybody is going after any of this…GOP, RINOs, conservative establishment, other pundits, anybody!       DLH

0

0

This is a column that every American should read.

Howie Carr: Smirking media bias against GOP couldn’t be clearer

Howie Carr Offers Us a Needed “Crash Course” on Today’s Media

We have, from time to time, noted the snarkiness in newspaper and television stories as reported by the liberal media…on a daily basis.

In such stories, the average reader, busy getting on with life…making a living, raising a family, seeking some occasional relief from the daily grind, etc…and at the same time trying to keep themselves informed on the world around them, will quite understandably overlook the subtle sarcasm with which the liberal press is conveying information. Sarcasm and ‘snarkiness’, it must be acknowledged, directed specifically at public and political figures who share America’s traditional values.

The intent, we believe, is obviously to subliminally plant a negative impression in the unwary reader or viewer .

We’ve contended that that is the goal, and, that it is very effective as it is applied over time, in nearly every story and “news’ report.

We believe that, in many average Americans’ mind, this constant barrage of negative references toward other Americans, public figures, even those with whom they share a traditional view of our country, its values , its history, the motivating influences on which it was founded, has its desired effect. Without realizing it, these average Americans’ belief in their country is eroded, slowly, subtly, as the media subliminally destroys the images of patriotism, faith, and respect on which a well ordered society has thrived.

Howie Carr’s column provides an excellent and detailed “teaching moment” on the techniques and on the manner in which they are applied to the stories the media, day by day, falsely “informs” us on.

After reading it, most casual consumers of “news” as Americans are being “fed” by the MSM will, hopefully, never again approach so-called “objective journalism” in the same way.

And they shouldn’t!        DLH

Dissect it here, add examples, defend the MM if you can . . .

Howie Carr: Smirking media bias against GOP couldn’t be clearer 
Have you ever noticed how differently Republicans are treated in the media than Democrats?Every newsroom in the country used to have what was called the “AP Stylebook” to use in writing news stories.

Now you need two AP stylebooks, one for Democrats, about whom seldom is heard a discouraging word, and a second for the GOP, with a hundred different pejoratives.
Two parties, two vocabularies. One positive, one negative — very bad, evil in fact.
Consider the testimony by Michael Cohen last week in front of various Congressional committees.

For example, since he worked for Donald Trump, Cohen was described about a million times as a “fixer.” Democrats, on the other hand, have lawyers.

To prevent the release of embarrassing information, Democrats’ lawyers negotiate NDA’s — nondisclosure agreements. Republican fixers’ NDAs are “hush money,” or “bribes.”
Hillary Clinton paid hundreds of thousands of dollars to Democrat operatives who then bought or made up false Russian dirt on Trump — that was opposition research. Republicans, on the other hand, “collude!”

Republicans lie, Democrats misspeak.

Democrats plan, Republicans scheme.

Republicans hire lobbyists, Democrats use advocates. Republicans employ operatives or hired guns, Democrats prefer community activists.

If a Democrat changes his or her position on an issue, they have evolved … grown. Republicans “flip-flop.”

Whenever an unfamiliar politician is ensnared in some scandal, you naturally wonder which party he or she is a member of. If the “embattled” pol is a Republican, affiliation is usually noted in the headline, or at the very latest in the first paragraph.

If, however, you reach the third paragraph of the story without his party being identified, you can be absolutely certain you are reading about a Democrat miscreant.

Likewise, accusers are handled differently depending on who exactly they’re accusing. Brett Kavanaugh’s nomination to the Supreme Court was almost derailed by the not particularly credible “Dr.” Christine Blasey Ford. One of the women who’s accused Lt. Gov. Justin Fairfax of Virginia of sexual assault likewise has a Ph.D., but how often does the alt-left media refer to “Dr. Vanessa Tyson.” Fairfax, you see, is a Democrat.

Was Jussie Smollett’s fake hate crime ever referred to as “alleged?” Of course not. But all the real, documented, videotaped attacks on conservatives — invariably they are alleged, or “according to police reports.”

A Republican tax cut is a “corporate giveaway” for the rich, a boon to “one percenters” that the government “can’t afford.”

A Democrat-proposed tax increase, though, is an “investment in the future.” It’s for the children.

When there’s bad news about Republicans, Democrats “react.” But Republicans “pounce” or “seize.” Often, in fact, the only way any Democrat woes get mentioned at all in the media is when Republicans seize and pounce, not to mention “weaponize” Democrat scandals.

Let’s talk about legislation. When a Democrat solon finds a way to stop some GOP initiative, it’s because the brilliant parliamentarian (Nancy Pelosi?) has come up with a master stroke.

But when a Republican, say Mitch McConnell, does exactly the same thing, he is invariably called an obstructionist, relying on “arcane” tricks to produce “gridlock” and overturn centuries of “Congressional tradition.”

When Democrats in Congress hold oversight hearings, they are never less than “historic” “explosive,” full of “bombshells.” The Cohen hearings were so explosive, in fact, that I was expecting to see footage Wednesday night of the Capitol in smoking ruins.

Republican-run Congressional hearings are always described as grandstanding, sideshows, overreach and a total waste of taxpayer money.

Finally, the word of the day is “smirk.” Remember January’s first big fake-news hoax — the Covington Catholic high school students at the Lincoln Memorial. The kid in the Make America Great Again hat that day was Nicholas Sandmann, and he’s now suing the Washington Post for $250 million.

Every Social Justice Warrior on Twitter said the 16-year-old had it coming because of the “smirk” on his face. That was the smart word of the day — smirk.

So last week the illegal immigrant from Brazil who assaulted — allegedly — the 23-year-old MAGA-hat- wearing American in the bar in Falmouth was grabbed by ICE for being in the country illegally for 25 years. She got a big-time lawyer and he said, basically, that after getting boozed up, the illegal immigrant went all Third World on the American taxpayer because of his “smirk.”

So now apparently it’s OK to assault anyone wearing a MAGA hat … if they’re “smirking.”

No wonder half of America is beyond smirking at the alt-left media’s agitprop on behalf of the Democrats. The deplorables aren’t smirking anymore, they’re sneering.

Order Howie’s new book “Kennedy Babylon Vol. 2” at howiecarrshow.com.

0

0

NOW THERE’S A BIG SURPRISE!

– OBAMACARE – ASYLUM – RIGHT TO LIFE

Gordon Lightfoot said it best: “Sometimes I think it’s a sin. When I feel like I’m winnin’ when I’m losin again” (From “Sundown”)

Hold the Revolution: Roberts Keeps Joining High Court Liberals 
By Greg Stohr, Bloomberg

– Chief justice sides with inmate in death penalty ruling
Court lies low after divisive Kavanaugh confirmation fight

– “This may be Chief Justice Roberts taking very seriously his role as the median justice and perhaps the beginning of his being the swing justice,” said Erwin Chemerinsky, dean of the University of California’s Berkeley Law. “But I would not come to that conclusion too quickly.”

– “Roberts’s approach has opened him to criticism. Blackman said the chief justice’s effort to avoid the appearance of partisanship “necessarily entails political calculations,” signaling that “public perception, and not the law, drives the direction of the court.”

In our opinion, Chief Justice Roberts will come down on the liberal side on every key issue…just as he did in twisting himself into a pretzel to preserve ObamaCare. Our fear is that Brett Kavanaugh is very much like Roberts.        DLH

https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=1&v=K7NMvpZ3PM0

Sadly,Wreck of Edmund Fitzgerald isn’t without application

0

0

• MISS PEGGY WRITES HER UGLIEST COLUMN YET
• NO DEMOCRAT, INCUMBENT OR OTHERWISE, NOR THOSE WHO VOTED FOR THEM, HAS HAD HEAPED ON THEM SUCH SNIDENESS BY HER

Beneath her ‘elegant’ prose, “Miss Peggy” harbors a deep resentment…and it has never come through as openly than in this bitter attack on President Trump

I believe that Ms. Noonan has had, for a long time, a thinly concealed bitterness toward the Republican Party in general, and many of its conservative members.

She seems to have always overvalued her contributions to the nation, especially as “special assistant” and speechwriter for President Reagan.

A gifted writer, she penned some of Reagan’s best known speeches. As chief speechwriter for President G H W Bush’s campaign, however, she will alway’s be remembered as the creator of the line Mr. Bush probably wished he had never uttered, “Read my lips; No new taxes!”

At any rate, with her work for Reagan and Bush the Elder, ‘Ms. Peggy’, in our view it seems, expected to be a key player in the George W. Bush administration, but her talents were somehow overlooked.

To my knowledge, “Margaret Ellen” never thereafter uttered a kind word for GW, and, for the most part, any Republican or GOP president since.

Her Dislike for Donald Trump is palpable And today’s column in the Wall Street journal may be her ‘eloquent’ nastiest yet!

In it, she writes that, in her modest opinion, Michael Cohen’s testimony before the House Oversight and Reform committee, was “credible overall”!

And, in an old rhetorical trick, the 68 year old “conservative” (only attested to in her bio) columnist told readers that she “suspected” that “most everyone in America…(also found it credible overall”)... because no one, friend of the president or foe, love him or hate him, thinks Mr. Trump has a high personal character or an especially admirable back story.”

“Democrats say the purpose of the hearing was to get at the truth, Republicans say it was to disrupt the Trump presidency , and both are correct.” (I believe that few of Ms. Noonan’s “fellow conservatives” would agree with her assertion that the purpose of the hearing had anything at all to do about getting “at the truth”!)

It’s hard to miss the glee that Noonan must have felt as she penned the following:

“But history, which is a real and actual thing, was also at the table, and this is what history was told by a man who was for 10 years the president’s personal lawyer and confidante, an intimate who was present at the creation:

“Mr. Cohen implied the president’s Russian policies are not and never have been on the up-and-up: “Mr. Trump knew of and directed the Trump-Moscow negotiations throughout the campaign, and lied about it. He lied because he never expected to win the election. He also lied about it because he stood to make hundreds of millions of dollars on the Moscow real-estate project.” Mr. Cohen said he came to see the president’s true character: “Since taking office he has become the worst version of himself. . . . Donald Trump is a man who ran for office to make his brand great, not to make our country great. He had no desire or intention to lead this nation—only to market himself and to build his wealth and power. Mr. Trump would often say, the campaign is going to be the ‘greatest infomercial in political history.’ He never expected to win the primary. He never expected to win the general election. The campaign—for him—was always a marketing opportunity.”

This is what the eminent Peggy Noonan thinks is “credible overall”!!

“None of these charges were new, precisely. They have been made in books, investigations and interviews both on and off the record. What is amazing though is that such a rebuke—such an attack on the essential nature of a president, and by an intimate—has no equal in our history. I don’t think, as we talk about Mr. Cohen’s testimony, we fully appreciate this. John Dean said there was a cancer growing in the presidency. He didn’t say Richard Nixon was the cancer. He didn’t say the president was wicked and a fraud.

“This is bigger than we think, and history won’t miss the import of this testimony.

“Were the hearings step one in an ultimate impeachment attempt? We’ll see. The 7½ hours came across like the artillery bombardment before the charge. Older Democrats will counsel that the way forward is to spend the next year weakening the president—2020 is coming, a move to impeach will cause grave national trouble. Will they prevail?

“Everyone focuses on the always-upcoming Mueller report, but the action seems to be in Manhattan. When Mr. Cohen was asked if there were any illegal acts regarding Donald Trump that hadn’t come up in the hearings, he said yes.” “Those are a part of the investigation that’s currently being looked at by the Southern District of New York,” meaning the U.S. attorney there. What did the president or one of his agents communicate to Mr. Cohen the last time they had contact? “This topic is actually something that’s being investigated right now by the Southern District of New York.”

We are intrigued particularly by this little tidbit: “What did the president or one of his agents communicate to Mr. Cohen the last time they had contact?” Admittedly , with only a layman’s understanding of the law, our question is, “Isn’t there anymore the concept of ‘lawyer-client privilege’? Yes, we’re aware of the stipulation re: if criminal acts are involved…but must there not be at least some credible proof of such, other than a convicted perjurers hearsay?

Oh well. I’m sure Ms. Noonan will sort it all out for us benighted Trump voters. DLH

Michael Cohen Makes History 
There’s no precedent for such an attack on the essential nature of an American president

0

0

Seems jail-house lawyers went to more rigorous law schools than song bird Michael Cohen

From Fast-Eddie in Michigan:

Badda bing! Michigan’s Cooley Law School, the same as the honorable Congresswoman Rashida Tliab, from M-13th District. It’s a private law school consistently ranked amongst the lowest in the country. Other stellar accomplishments the last few years include closing campuses, selling buildings, furloughing faculty and staff, getting sanctioned by the ABA for admitting students deemed incapable of meeting requirements for graduation, and placing 30.8% of graduates.

Tliab and Cohen – quite the alma mater

0

0

Prior to the latest”summit” meeting between President Trump and North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, the liberal media, members of the Washington establishment, and even some self-styled “fair and balanced” news personalities were predicting that Trump was so anxious to get a “deal’ on denuclearization that he would “give away the store” to Kim in return for little or nothing.

The most popular analysis had it that Trump did not know what he was doing, and the wily, little Communist dictator would outsmart him and at most offer empty concessions which Trump would not be able to enforce, in return for relief from all sanctions, and who knows what else.

And then, Trump, desperate to claim success as the “great negotiator’ would announce that he got the ‘greatest deal ever’, and that he had fulfilled his promises of denuclearization!

Actually, those experts had some knowledge on which to base their expectations. Some had personal experience in being hornswoggled by the North Koreans. The last several presidents, over decades, thought they had gotten great agreements from the “Hermit Kingdom”, only to realized they’d been completely fooled.

And, of course, the media knew for sure that Trump is an idiot and will give Kim everything he wants so that he can claim a ‘win’ ahead of the 2020 elections.

The Irony

So what happened? Trump met with Kim, pressed America’s legitimate demands that an agreement be reached to begin a process by which North Korea would rid itself of nuclear weapons, with a strict verification process that would insure their compliance, in return for the lifting of sanctions at an appropriate time and some assurances that Kim could live with and which would provide better living and economic conditions for his country, his people and his government.

Kim would not agree to certain of our presidents demands and expected that Trump would settle more or less on North Korea’s terms, as previous US presidents have done.

Not this time…and Trump walked away from the table as he has said he would if genuine progress toward the ultimate goal was not offered and accepted.

So now, the same Trump critics are saying the whole thing failed and Trump was a failure.

Obama would have succeeded?

That is the laughable assertion the media the establishment, and the Democrats are making.

The irony is that Trump has given his critics and the hapless Obama people a lesson in “Effective foreign policy negotiations 101″.

How stark is the difference between the President Trump approach to crucial negotiations and the farcical performance by the Obama administration is agreeing to the most dangerous and foreign policy fiasco in modern history…the Iran Nuclear Agreement”!

Trump was accused of wanting this deal so badly he would give Kim whatever he wanted in return for little or nothing, just so he could claim a win.

What Was the US ‘Best and Final Offer’?

“You both have an engaging smile but you do understand we would have to kill you * . . . besides the deal is queer enough.”

Obama (and Kerry) wanted the Iran agreement even more and were not only willing to give Iran literally anything they wanted, and in fact, more than they expected, and got nothing for America in return…nor did they care.

To be crude, perhaps, is to say that one might even think Obama was so desperate to get a deal, he would have offered oral sex to get it! The liberal media would understand, even applaud.

(Maybe he did, but the Iranians said, “We’d rather have $150 million in unmarked bills.”) DLH

* . . . kill you

0

0

A typical thinly veiled effort to negatively portray Trump and supporters; while cautioning the media to not blow the chance

The Media Will Re-Elect Trump (pay wall*)

They would rather believe tall tales about Russia than hear what voters said in 2016.

“He is universally reviled by elite institutions, including the media. Except for his knack for turning their hatred into lemonade, his only asset is his rapport with an unrich, unconnected voter segment that falls far short of a majority.”
————————————————————————————————

Holman Jenkins writes for the Wall Street Journal. His views reflect generally the contempt that most of the Journal’s editorial board has for the president.

In this column, Mr. Jenkins, in his patented sneering condescension, puts that contempt on display in what presumably he thinks us rubes will view as an “even-handed analysis”.

Hardly!

While he effectively takes the media to task for its biases, glaring incompetence, and unseemly affection for the Democrat party’s often comedic pursuit of Trump, Jenkins also manages to do it while at the same time bashing the president and characterizing his supporters as ignorant, unsophisticated, uninformed rubes.

I believe that, both the WSJ’s liberal news section and its slightly right-of-center editorial board would have much preferred a Hillary Clinton presidency, along with her ‘open borders’ and damaging to the US “one world” trade policies, and even the lethal Iran nuclear agreement President Trump thankfully repudiated!

Here are just a few of our favorite excerpts from Mr. Jenkins’ latest column:        DLH

•”Donald Trump’s tenure has been a pleasant surprise compared to expectations, which isn’t saying much…”

•”There is a humongous irony here. Not expecting to win, Mr. Trump allowed his organization’s desultory pursuit of a Trump tower in Moscow to continue during the 2016 campaign. Make no mistake, though a report that he instructed Michael Cohen to lie to Congress about this matter has been debunked by none other than special counsel Robert Mueller, it remains true that Mr. Cohen lied to Congress. The lack of any other crime will not stop this episode from being central in a Democratic House impeachment hearing resting heavily on hints that there is something fishy about Mr. Trump’s attitudes about Russia.

•”But what is true of Mr. Trump is also true of James Comey. He also expected Mr. Trump to lose. The FBI’s own highly questionable actions during the campaign, which inadvertently helped elect Mr. Trump, he and his Obama colleagues also expected to go unexamined.”

•”Rep. Adam Schiff has signaled that he intends to rake through Mr. Trump’s business and bank records searching for the motive for collusion crimes that exist only in his imagination.

•”All this will be cheered on by backward-rationalizing pundits in the New York Times, justifying their own hysteria by portraying the routine, predictable and typically opportunistic partisan opposition faced by Mr. Trump as somehow exceptionally heroic.

•”A more honest rendition would notice that Mr. Trump—in many ways an accidental president—is also an unusually inexperienced and weak president, lacking even meaningful institutional roots in his own party.
“It takes no heroism to oppose him.”

•”Indeed, it is hard to explain how Mr. Trump can simultaneously be such a menace and such a pushover that every Democratic officeholder in the country thinks, “If only I can stumble into the nomination, I’m sure to be the next president.”

•”The answer, of course, is pundit vanity: Mr. Trump is a threat to democracy because writers opposing him then are very important people.

•”Our wonderful English language gives us a perfectly good word for major media interpretations of the Trump phenomenon. That word is fatuous. When historians weigh his well-advertised nature vs. the fantastic overreaction to his election, their first question will be: How did he become president? Voters must have had something in mind when they pulled the lever for somebody so seemingly unsuitable.”

•”So here we are. The media will eventually take notice of the strange acts of the U.S. intelligence community and their role in the 2016 election. Either that, or the story of the decade will continue to be told by alternative media outlets that, for all their faults, at least provide a venue for ignored realities to be taken account of. “

Note: “… the strange acts of the U.S. intelligence community and their role in the 2016 election.”

“Strange acts”??!! Mr. Jenkins, those “strange acts”were treachery, treason, and unusually dangerous criminal actions!!!

*”paywall” – ironic for the easy border WSJ isn’t it – control something with a wall, electronic or other wise, in order to claim something as yours, prevent its use, what have you

0

0

Donald Trump’s former-attorney-turned rat has been disbarred, reported the New York Post.

So now its all about turning celebrity 

OOPS! WRONG ‘MICKEY’, ER, MICHAEL, COHEN !

DLH

0

0

Did we say Kwanzaa – we meant Kamala  or is it Kabbala .  Anyway it was a puffed up event with a lot of camarilla. We’ll bet every pothead, Planned Parenthood devotee (split as they are between every Democrat trying to out baby-kill them), and transgender in Bettendorf (and Davenport) turned out for this show. They do get around

From the Dallas News Bureau Chief:

At least 500 people in Bettendorf, on Iowa’s east coast, for @KamalaHarris town hall. #IACaucus

He Tweets —

“knows how to prosecute President Donald Trump, citing her former job as state attorney general Sunday.”

Harris, a 2020 presidential candidate, was in Bettendorf, Iowa, speaking to a group of supporters, when she said, “we’re gonna need a fighter, and we’re going to need somebody who knows how to prosecute the case against this president,” pitching herself as the ideal candidate to defeat Trump in 2020 to the audience of around 500.

We hope there is a roving conservative, hell even Republican, truth force, well disciplined and rehearsed to show up at these and take videos, document and ask questions – maybe there is – Democrats do it all the time.

About the number “500” — I doubt it –  maybe 350 (counting heads in one of the stills shown and extrapolating generously).  And 50 to 75 of that is press and staff. You know the press contingent was large if the Dallas News sends its Washington Bureau Chief.

Rumors of  Harris’ campaign slogan: “Kamala about Californicating America (KACA)

0

0