A MUST READ
This article by Jennifer Van Laar writing at Red State today presents a solid refutation of the aiders and abettors at the AP in their attempts to ‘fact check’ obfuscate and deny evidence presented in the documentary. Van Laar’s article along with the links contained therein serves as a valuable resource verifying the assertions in 2000 Mules as to one avenue of how the 2020 election theft was accomplished.
Email sent to SOS Paul Pate and Governor Reynolds
I am writing to plead that your office delay scheduled destruction of any records, electronic and paper, including administrative memos and guidances pertaining to the 2020 elections — federal, state and local — and I ask you to use your powers or auspices to call for any other office of state or county government to protect all such records as well.
Canvassing and voting integrity projects are under way in our state having been delayed by COVID and other reasons including perhaps sketchy cooperation. Records should be retained for more months in order for investigators to verify the dependability of posted results using dependable techniques and analysis not used by various jurisdictions whose mandates and techniques are typically cursory or minimal in scope.
Beyond the ease of fraudulent voting . . . given the incredible push for vote by mail in this state, including official hectoring, . . . from onesie-twosie household efforts to more organized institutional efforts all fueled by a political zeitgeist of the end justifying the means . . . that, combined with the cursory level of attention to signature verification creates the need for more diligent followup investigations. There is also the matter of investigating what is credibly seen as partisan targeting of get out the vote efforts under the color of official acts financed by outside interests. These matters require additional time to complete and the records to do so.
Confidence in the election process is critical to representative government and current canvassing processes are not adequate to assuage reasonable doubt about those processes in theory and as applied, particularly as regards mail-in voting and signature verification, but also verification of voting, eligibility issues, double voting, registration accuracy and more. Insights into all of these can be obtained when there is an open book and time to study it.
There are elements in our partisan political establishment that eat, drink, plot electoral “gaming” workarounds and loopholes that combined with local partisanship, lack of focus, overwork, naiveté, lack of leadership, complacency or laziness enable illegal activity or confuse people to participate. One or more of those is likely a factor in every county in Iowa and might be identified with a proper more thorough investigation of how much integrity and preventatives are in the system. Honest officials and employees have nothing to fear from identification of problem areas, those with law enforcement responsibilities ought to welcome help to uncover fraud.
If there is little to verifiably report after adequate investigations then confidence in Iowa’s results are substantiated. Because of high profile already substantiated charges of illegalities in violation of state laws in other states, including nearby Wisconsin involving totals that throw the veracity of the election into doubt, states with arguably more reliable processes and compliance can serve as a beacon of light with transparency and processes that hold up to serious scrutiny beyond self-affirming circular processes. If considerable fraudulent voting is uncovered whether or not it would change declared results then all ought to be concerned about vulnerabilities in the system.
A rush to destroy records at the minimal point of statutory authorization, but not a mandate to do so in September will be interpreted as a bureaucratic coverup at best.
Storage cannot possibly be a serious issue even with the coming 2022 election. I do not know the unused storage capacity for SOS but I do know that secure metal waterproof storage containers from 20 feet to 40 feet in length are readily available and rent for $120 to $240 per month.
Again, I plead that your office delay scheduled destruction of any records, electronic and paper, including administrative memos and guidances pertaining to the 2020 elections — federal, state and local — and I ask you to use your powers or auspices to call for the same to county election officials.
Sincerely,
Roger Mall
address and email
Davenport, IA 52807
Contact information for emails to Iowa officials:
SOS Paul Pate: sos@sos.iowa.gov
Governor Reynolds and Lt Gov. Gregg: https://governor.iowa.gov/contact
Senate and House majority party leadership:
jake.chapman@legis.iowa.gov, brad.zaun@legis.iowa.gov, jack.whitver@legis.iowa.gov,
amy.sinclair@legis.iowa.gov, pat.grassley@legis.iowa.gov, matt.windschitl@legis.iowa.gov
The evidence is mounting – the top echelon is corrupt and the rank and file are sullied by the association. Many of them are lawyers, that more of the rank and file of all FBI specialties have not gotten together to blow the whistle and demand change (some have) creates a no-confidence climate about the institution.
Related reading
Yes, We Will Question the Integrity of Our Federal Law Enforcement Officials
10 Similarities Between The FBI’s Mar-A-Lago Raid And Spygate
The Espionage Act of 1917 Once Again Rears Its Ugly Head
Majority of Americans View FBI as Biden’s Personal Gestapo
Old case over audio tapes in Bill Clinton’s sock drawer could impact Mar-a-Lago search dispute
E-Mail Iowa SOS Pate to encourage/insure Iowa hard records and data be kept for at least ten years. Communicate the same to Iowa GOP leader Kaufman and also Iowa Governors office to put Pate on notice. Encourage GOP AG candidate Brenna Bird to speak out.
Many states (including Iowa?) to begin destroying election records and data – This from AVA via DH
5.) Louisiana SOS retains 2020 Election Records. As we approach the end of 22 months since the 2020 election, many states will begin deleting certain records under federal law. Louisiana is leading the way in asking that records be retained in the most uncertain election of our lifetime.
Why? Well because the information posted in our previous post needs to be investigated:
We link you decide — was Iowa’s election secure?
And because of the information in this article by Emerald Robinson:
There’s So Much Election Fraud Evidence It’s Hard To Keep Up!
Here are eight articles from yours truly summarizing all the fraud
This cheap QC Times article seems a shaming exercise rather than lament of the real reasons for an overburdened immigration situation (link below). It was forwarded to us by TN with his description: “Biden success story”. However sardonic the use of “success” his sentiment that Biden owns the problems associated with the Afghan refugee situation is true. Biden bungled the withdrawal of American forces causing far more Afghans to be refugees. Further, every problem associated with resettlement of Afghan refuges into low-cost housing, providing food, medical care, job placement are greatly exacerbated by Biden and the Left’s virtual open boarders immigration policy. One competes with the other
The full QC Times article by Alma Gaul is available through the link. The report revolves around the local branch of the charity World Relief’s efforts to resettle Afghan refugees. Below are some pull quotes from the article that elicited our questions and comments.
So resident Biden creates a situation causing thousands of Afghans to leave in a panic for fear for their lives under the Taliban — but World Relief (hereinafter WR) spokespersons have no comment or are neutral on that? Has WR at any time been critical of the catastrophic abandonment of Afghanistan, to the same degree as they lament and criticize processes and availabilities here? Do they have any realization of the problems caused by open borders, disorderly emigration/immigration that more than aggravates the problems they lament in the article?
Here are some gems (set here in bold italics) that appear towards the end of the lengthy article, V’pac annotations follow:
Some properties owned by out-of-area companies said they wouldn’t rent to the Afghans because they couldn’t pass a credit check. “They come from a war zone!” Fontaine said. “We saw that as a sign of blatant racism.”
The BS racism comment is the most egregious part but one must ask given the tone if they consider charity and or risk taking something to be expropriated against their will from landlords? Credit checks are important to limit risk. Now the WR principles (not the volunteers) quoted activities are referred to as charitable, yet as also revealed in the article those WR principles are paid for their work. Note this:
The agency hired more staff, which had dwindled to fewer than 15 during the Trump Administration when the number of refugees and immigrants accepted into the country dropped so low that there was little work to do.
Really, the term “dwindled” is used. If that is a lament by WR then that would imply that these folks are in the business of resettlement, not all that interested in policies that compete with their relief business. The implication of the attitudes expressed by WR in the article is that it is appropriate to pay staff but landlords are not to be reliably paid or are to absorb costs and somehow make their mortgage payments.
As regards the racism charge — are they seriously suggesting that the “out of area companies” (gee I wonder if they are Chinese) would/should lend to a White, an Asian, a Black, a Whomever no matter their credit status until they have a work record or income source? In the case of refugees I thought that was WR’s charitable function — to sustain such individuals until such time as they can be independent? Why doesn’t WR guarantee the rent — oh silly us they want the landlord to regardless of the rents they pay in the form of mortgages on the rental property they own . We suspect your typical “out of area company” really does not care who they rent to as long as they get paid.
The article goes on: (Fontaine is the local WR spokesperson)
In another instance, an apartment Fontaine was told was move-in ready clearly was not.
“I walked in and there was a dead bird. There was a dead mouse. There was poop (human) all over the bathroom. I was gagging. We had signed a lease; we took the word of the landlord. We cleaned it up and put a family in there.”
Now that indicates real competence by the WR people We had signed a lease; we took the word of the landlord.
As a pest control technician not very long ago I witnessed a number of rent-subsided apartments with appalling filth (by no means all). I don’t think the landlords caused it. There was no racial pattern to the filth although certain cultures might learn to understand the attraction of open cooking pot oils permeating rooms as an attraction to cockroaches. In servicing properties after move-outs it was clear that some were more like abandonments with windows left open and torn screens – so a bird can get in and not find its way out. The landlord likely did not do that, want that, nor find out about it until reported — perhaps for days or longer. Who left it that way? Was it a former WR client or a personality that the welfare state helps make?
Landlords are not welfare charities and should not be presumed to be. If tolerating filth is a pattern with that owner — the article does not say if WR reported the situation to the health bureaucracy nor whether the particular abode was owned locally — why are they signing leases to a particular abode sight unseen?!
Fontaine said she sensed the landlord thought the unit was good enough for a nonprofit organization.
That WR volunteers cleaned it up is commendable but objectively one can ask if that does not enable what they decry?
Our comments are not intended to disparage refugees or the appropriateness of such status to particular Afghanies but the obliviousness (or purposefulness) of a system (including nonprofits and government policies and agencies) toward open borders — a situation which breeds pressures on housing– producing, fostering, or enabling but often leaving the worst conditions for needy refugees “in competition with” willful illegal immigrants.
Yes we can do better and Trump’s policies were better.
Related reading —
Afghanistan and the Collapse of Normals’ Faith in the System.
Democrats cannot be tolerated with your vote
Reading various commentators on the law and politics of the Biden “Justice” Department decision to have FBI agents goons (from Washington DC) raid President Trump’s residence in search of a few boxes of archives over which there was dispute as to whether he had them, whether they were “classified”, whether he had a right to have them in possession if he did, and other points of contention — all matters that should have been settled in the course of negotiation, legal motions, appeal, notice, etc. or ignored, all which would have been afforded a Democrat — is chilling.
The raid was intended as a pure act of intimidation with political purpose, and intolerable on that basis. It was also a display of weakness, the fear of Trump as a candidate and likely resuming the presidency (given the tenor of the country other Republicans could likely assume the presidency but that is a discussion for another post). The British King and Parliament tried to intimidate Massachusetts and any similarly minded subject colonies, in the 1770s . . . to show us who was boss. Their effort became known as the Intolerable Acts. The Mar-a-Lago raid is an intolerable act that was not just intended to intimidate Trump but to intimidate the political climate nationwide toward subservience to Democrat policies. It was just as much about us.
The swamp hopes and has has no doubt already wired the process of trying to exercise lawfare which includes as a punishment of the records act pretext that conviction prevents one from holding federal office. The big problem with that is it likely unconstitutional as regards the presidency. The Constitution sets the requirement for the president not Congress which cannot make further restrictions on its own.
This intolerable act was not just intended to intimidate Trump but any subsequent Republican office holder. All Democrats ought to be held accountable for being associated with a regime that looks at policy enforcement this way. No Democrat deserves your vote in November and the way to root them out is not likely to involve third parties at this time.
Collection of informative links to follow.
View a two part presentation about vote fraud and or vulnerabilities in Iowa (and other states). From Iowacanvassing.com Thanks to DH for the forward.
Over the last 18 months, Dr. Douglas Frank, a renowned scientist and physicist and a 40-year modeler of elections, has been in 42 states. On July 27th, 11 days ago, Dr. Frank was in Iowa for the first time to talk about “What Happened in Iowa,” explaining the massive evidence of fraud and how Iowa’s 2020 election was stolen through each of our 99 counties, and what we, the citizens, can do to get our country back.
This event in Independence, Iowa, was sponsored by the Iowa Canvassing grassroots volunteers, see www.iowacanvassing.com for more information about them. (Their) GiveSendGo account can be found at https://www.givesendgo.com/G3BP1.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wcFoOnJDhXg
Leach
This was a pretty big yawner even here, the long -time official hometown of 30 year Iowa “Republican” congressman Jim Leach. This guy has been dressing the part of a Democrat for years and has now officially transitioned. We called for his persona non grata status at Republican events years ago and his home county Republicans in convention agreed. *. Everyone is happier now that he has come out of the closet and that he can still rock the tweeds just like Hillary.
Dick Cheney in a crotchety voice says “there has never been a greater threat to our republic than Donald Trump”. This is more senile than Joe Brandon Biden. It does not even register on the Allen Cognition Scale. If not that then he must be possessed, like his daughter, or maybe this was just an episode of The Simpson’s featuring Mr. Burns.
Meanwhile Liz Cheney is trying to entice Democrats to vote for her in the primary to teach Trump supporters a lesson and save the Republic or something. It is delusional but heck with all that out of state money to spend . . . Trump derangement syndrome is really something to behold. I would say the ad will lose her more Republicans (from the smallish group that will vote for her in Wyoming) than it will gain her in the target Democrats she is hoping for. We are thinking her primary election night get together could be held in a walk-in closet, that is if she deigns to be in Wyoming for the event. We are not here to trash every Bush/Cheney policy but he and his daughter have revealed a despicable side.
*Resolution passed at the Scott County Republican Party Convention (item 13.9 as amended) in 2012 after Leach endorsed Obama.
Related reading here
Real support for the Free Chinese and standing up to Communist China would be more than a layover in Taipei. We recommend this commentary by John Daniel Davidson at The Federalist:
If Nancy Pelosi Cared About Confronting China She’d Do More Than Stage Political Theater
Related reading and graphic here.
