Sheesh

More internet access problems this time by Mediacom.  Just now resolved (maybe) but no time to post before work. Back with a post this evening

Posted in UNCATEGORIZED | Comments Off on Sheesh

Forget the “business oriented” Republicans

  • The lame brains and greedy among them can keep their money and since they have only one vote each, their vote and money power is easily made up
  • Nothing succeeds like success

This article from Rick Manning at Americans for Small Government (set forth in its entirety) effectively answers the Erik Erickson at Resurgent ‘warning” which says:

The President’s team needs to try to find some way to build loyalty with these business oriented Republicans because they’re wobbly

If building loyalty to them means Trump going back on his base then that is a losing proposition, it assumes the stupid portion is larger than they are, that their political power is uncheckable, their money essential (it can be made up) not to mention that most of them can be shamed by their betters.

Here is Manning’s article which explains the differences in Trump’s trade posture and the economy, along with the Great Branco cartoon repeated here and by Manning as it also cuts to the political chase.  Comments attached to Erickson’s article also challenge his theme.

Why aren’t prices going up due to tariffs on Chinese goods? Plus, other questions on China trade.

Stock markets go up and down based upon the latest trade rumors. Predictions of price hikes make headlines, yet the inflation rate remains at the levels, 2.0 percent at last count, desired by the Federal Reserve. What is going on? And is this even really a trade war with China at all, or is it part of something much bigger? These are questions that should be asked but are often lost to click-bait headlines. So, here are a few thumbnail answers that will hopefully help you understand what is going on.

Question: Are President Trump’s use of tariffs against China part of a trade war?

Those who try to put tariffs on goods made in China into this context are deliberately narrowing the real challenge in the economic relations between the U.S. and China.

The tariffs are designed to restructure America’s trade relations with China, but when you examine the key demands from the recent attempts to create a new economic partnership with China, they are mostly focused upon protecting patents, ending forced technology transfers to the Chinese government and stopping Chinese currency manipulation which always puts U.S. goods at a competitive disadvantage with Chinese goods.

Traditional trade deals lower or equalize tariffs while opening markets for specific products to be imported into the agreeing country’s markets. While the currently being negotiated trade deal with China contains these elements, the inclusion of the protection of intellectual property makes this confrontation more about whether the United States wants to have a country that doesn’t accept the basic elements of free enterprise as a primary trading partner. China is a communist country. As such, they do not believe in basic private property rights protections.

One example of this problem is that the Chinese government is imposing requirements that foreign based companies share technologies with Chinese companies (almost always tied to the Chinese military) in order to access or build plants on their soil. This requirement is certainly within the rights of the Chinese government, but for that same government to demand unfettered access to U.S. or other markets while stealing the research and development of foreign companies puts Chinese firms at a distinctly unfair economic advantage.

The primary emphasis of the U.S.-China trade negotiations on protecting intellectual property rights of firms entering the Chinese market is nothing more than a test of whether China is going to engage the world on an equal footing or not by recognizing the most fundamental differentiator between a communist and capitalist country — private ownership rights. So this “trade war” is really about fundamentally transforming China by forcing their companies to develop their own innovations rather than stealing those created by others and then manufacturing the resulting products at a lower cost, not just because of cheaper labor and lax environmental and workplace rules, but due to the fact that they do not have to sink hundreds of billions of dollars into failed research to get to what works.

From a strictly Marxist perspective, the question is whether the United States is going to continue to allow China to steal the rope (research and development assets) with which they will hang us economically. So far, President Donald Trump’s answer is has been an emphatic, “No!”

Question: With the Consumer Price Index steady over the past year, why haven’t prices gone up more in light of the imposition of tariffs against about $250 billion in Chinese goods?

There are multiple reasons but here are three:

First, in part, China has devalued its currency which effectively put much of the cost of the tariffs on the backs of those who held Yuan (the Chinese people.) They did this to try to keep the price of Chinese made goods stable for American consumers.

Second, basic economics tells us that the price an item can be sold at is not elastic, instead it is a function of supply and demand. As a result, when the price goes up for a product a certain number of consumers drop out of the market for that product, lowering demand and equalizing the price. It does not matter if the reason behind the price increase is a tax, increased labor costs, inflation or a decision by the manufacturer, wholesaler or retailer to seek additional profit from the sale of that product.

Think of it this way, Walmart sells products off their shelves every day based upon what price they determine will move the most goods at the highest possible net profit. If they could sell the products for $10 more with no loss of how many customers purchased them, they would be foolishly leaving a lot of profit on the table, and their executives would rightfully lose their jobs, so they don’t. If Walmart determines that the cost of goods from China is becoming too expensive, they might raise some prices on the short-term, but over the longer haul, they will (and are) look for suppliers from countries like India and Vietnam which produce the same goods without the additional tariff costs. As these new contractual relationships are developed, Walmart then shifts its supply chain because any price increase is driving a certain percentage of consumers away from buying affected products, instead choosing other, less profitable alternatives or not buying them at all.

And, third, the tariffs are a relatively small amount of the overall economy so even an increase from 10 to 25 percent tariffs on $200 billion in imports, in addition to the already 25 percent already on $50 billion of high-tech goods, is miniscule in the macro-economy. America’s economy is $19.4 trillion, and the total new cost of the tariffs on $200 billion of Chinese imports amounts to $30 billion. While $30 billion is nothing to sneeze at, it is only 0.15 percent of the overall economy or the equivalent of about 1/7 of a penny for every $100.00. While these individual items may see some price inflation, the size of the overall economy effectively washes it out from being economically important on the whole.

Is trade with China a bad thing?

Most assuredly it is not. However, non-reciprocal trade relations with China has played a real role in hollowing out the U.S. manufacturing sector. But let’s be clear, this is not the fault of the Chinese government, but instead is the fault of the U.S. elected officials who continued to allow an unequal relationship to exist. President Trump is seeking to reconfigure this relationship on a more equal footing to allow U.S.-made goods to compete abroad on a number of fronts. Most specifically by attacking the issue of currency manipulation, the Chinese state imposed pricing disadvantage for U.S. manufactured goods in Chinese markets would at least be mitigated and the pricing advantage that Chinese goods have when sold in the United States would also be offset.

The effect, due to the nature of pricing explained above, will likely be that low-end items will still be produced abroad, but rather than being so reliant on China, our retailer supply lines will be diversified amongst a variety of competing nations, keeping the net retail price relatively in check. This diversification of our trade relationships with a broader array of countries creates more competition, even between communist states, who are battling for access to U.S. markets. And anyone familiar with supply and demand knows that competition breeds not only lower prices, but also, on the whole, better products as consumers have increased numbers of features allowing them to make qualitative choices between different brands.

With so many questions swirling around the China trade deal, I hope this helps sort out some of the stakes in the negotiations and why it is wise to question those who have a stake in the status quo.

Rick Manning is President of Americans for Limited Government.

Posted in UNCATEGORIZED | Comments Off on Forget the “business oriented” Republicans

Posters for our times

Thanks to RD

Posted in UNCATEGORIZED | Comments Off on Posters for our times

PEGGY’S JUST TRYING TO HELP

STATURE INDEED

“There is no argument that impeachment would enhance America’s position in the world, and no reason to believe it would not have some negative impact on the economy, meaning jobs.” P. Noonan
————————–

That ‘lovable’ Miss Peggy. She makes assertions with such moral authority and eloquent indignity. The above quote from her latest column illustrates:

Miss Peggy doesn’t like Donald Trump…a lot! But then, Miss Peggy doesn’t like conservatives even more. In fact, Miss Peggy really doesn’t like anybody much, other than herself. She is a bitter, vindictive, smoother version of Kathleen Parker and, marginally less off-putting than George Will or Bill Kristol. Ms. Noonan never got over GW Bush not naming her his ‘co-president’…or at least a very high, influential member of his administration. After all, in Peggy’s mind (only), it was she who really made Ronald Reagan a successful ‘actor-turned-president’.

But back to her most recent column and the above quote.

“…no argument that impeachment would enhance America’s position in the world…”. Instead Noonan proposes her “alternative to impeachment…”congressional censure”, not “political” disapproval, she says, but Congress’s “moral disapproval”!

REALLY!?

Congress’s “moral disapproval”!? Congress as the arbiter of “morality”? Oh, come now, Peggy, do you expect to be taken seriously with that?

But, again, more importantly, because of Trump, in Noonan’s mind, America’s “position in the world” needs to be “enhanced”?!

Does Ms. Peggy mean “enhance” as in the manner in which her “hero”, Barack Obama, “enhanced” America’s position in the world…as in, for just one example: Obama, rather than put the “Paris Climate Agreement ” before the Senate to ratify it as a treaty, as the Constitution requires, went to the United Nations to get its approval (as a “non-binding agreement”…NOT a “treaty”) in order to pressure this nation to comply fully with a pact which had not been approved by the designated representatives of the American people! (https://www.globalpolicyjournal.com/blog/26/04/2016/paris-agreement-when-treaty-not-treaty)

And, wasn’t that same seedy, unconstitutional sleight-of-hand used with the Iran Nuclear “agreement’.

And, of course, the dishonesty and the defects of Obama’s sleaze were effectively exposed when President Trump simply exited those ‘faux agreements’ by the same method (only Constitutionally proper that time) Obama used.

The upshot of both Trump actions?

Well, In Peggy Noonan’s mind, and that of Democrats, Trump-haters, and the liberal media, “America’s position in the world” was “diminished”!

Really?

In our view, and that of many Americans, and all who love this country, the world was made safer, the sovereignty of this great nation was preserved, America’s taxpayers were relieved of the burden of carrying on their backs the total global ‘defense’ against the hoax of ” man-made climate change”!

The additional dividend from this action by America’s most effective president in many decades? A new and strong, grudging respect for the last ‘Great Hope for the World”, the United States of America!

So, bring on your “moral disapproval”, through “congressional censure”, Miss Peggy.

DLH          Excerpt of Noonan column below:

 

———-

OPINION DECLARATIONS, by Peggy Noonan, her column appearing in the Wall Street Journal,  (excerpt)

Mueller’s Exit and an Impeachment Alternative
Trying to overturn an election would be too divisive. Congress should censure Trump instead.

Republicans, who control the Senate, wouldn’t vote to remove the president, but to morally disapprove of him? They would. There’s plenty of suppressed resentment there at how he’s mortified them and lowered things.

Mr. Mueller is a serious man who in a long career has earned the respect in which he is held. But he’s slipped out of public life on a banana peel, hasn’t he? He was the investigator. He led the probe. He should have advised Attorney General William Barr of his views as to whether the actions of the president merited federal charges, and let Mr. Barr take it from there.

There is no argument that impeachment would enhance America’s position in the world, and no reason to believe it would not have some negative impact on the economy, meaning jobs.

Mr. Trump is obsessed with looking competent and in control. She (Nancy Pelosi) actually is competent and in control. She’s held on to leadership a long time.

The harrowing part of the Mueller report is part 2, on obstruction of justice. Reading it, you feel sure the president would have loved to subvert the investigation but wasn’t good at it and was thwarted by his staff. There are seemingly dangled pardons and threatened firings. There’s a hapless small-timeness to it, a kind of brute dumbness, and towering over it all is a grubby business deal in Moscow.

It’s unseemly.

Congressional censure would be a formal registering not of Congress’s political disapproval but its moral disapproval. It is a rarely used form of shaming. Congress has censured its own members over the years, including Sen. Joseph McCarthy in 1954—but no president since Andrew Jackson in 1834.

Republicans, who control the Senate, wouldn’t vote to remove the president, but to morally disapprove of him? They would. There’s plenty of suppressed resentment there at how he’s mortified them and lowered things.

That is the less invasive path, the less damaging to the country, the less pointlessly polarizing.

Posted in UNCATEGORIZED | 1 Comment

THE MS 13 EXPRESS…

Along with the other legends of compatriot underground railroad lore destined for the US:

  • LaRaza Limited 
  • Aztlan Zephyr (apologies to the California Zephyr)
  • Bienestar Constellation
  • Hashish Express (apologies to the Marrakesh Express)
  • Red, White & Green Special  (apologies to the Orange Blossom Special)
  • Flying Frijole (as in “we don’t give a flying frijole about your laws”) (apologies to the Flying Scotsman)

Blue Flu in sanctuary cities (allergy to ICE).  Lawmakers disregard law.

https://www.commercialappeal.com/story/news/government/city/2016/11/18/strickland-memphis-remains-welcoming-city/94088456/

https://thinkprogress.org/tennessee-just-banned-sanctuary-cities-2b1b8233abca/

https://www.commercialappeal.com/story/news/government/county/2018/05/21/what-tennessees-new-sanctuary-cities-ban-means-shelby-county/628741002/

Take that Night Train To Memphis
Take that Night Train To Memphis
You know how I’m longin’ to see you
Leave at three-fifty-seven; arrive at eleven
And I’ll be shoutin’ “Halle-lu-jah!” (Sp.,’aleluya’)

Take that Night Train To Memphis
Take that Night Train To Memphis
Tell that engineer to pull the throttle open
Keep that engine stack a-smokin’,
I’m not kiddin’, I’m not jokin’
I’ll soon be with my girl, I’m hopin’.

 

Posted in UNCATEGORIZED | Comments Off on THE MS 13 EXPRESS…

Ilhan Omar is the Democrat Party

She got confused, it’s CROSS your fingers and take the oath

She certainly represents it accurately and all its fraudulent, entitled, bitter, ignorant, freedom destroying, irresponsible, anti-Constitution, one-world-government, culturally depraved promotions.

This Michelle Malkin article describes one of Omar’s frauds on the American people and laws  —  her marrying of her brother or half-brother (that in itself  was, and even at this writing still is, illegal in Minnesota*) to scam the immigration system.  Her stonewalling, vanishing records,  protected status by Democrat interests  . . . all reminiscent of Obama’s school matriculation records and questions over his foreign student status.

Investigations dating back to 2016 by blogger Scott Johnson of Power Line (which recently celebrated 15 years in the blogosphere), David North of the Center for Immigration Studies, Alpha News reporter Preya Samsundar, and PJMedia.com reporter David Steinberg have determined that the outspoken Somalian Muslim refugee likely married her own brother named Ahmed Elmi in 2009 for some unknown ill-gotten gain while still informally married to the man she calls her husband and father of her three children, Ahmed Hirsi.

After a Somalian website floated questions about the marriage arrangement with Elmi and Johnson’s initial reporting broke into the local news, Omar sought to divorce Elmi. Her use of $6,000 in state campaign funds, some of which went to pay a personal divorce lawyer, is currently under state investigation.

Social media posts, photographic evidence, and publicly available biographical data strongly suggest that Elmi (now living in London) and Omar are siblings with the same father.

Many of the pair’s Instagram and Facebook comments to each other have been deleted.

Omar’s staff and lawyer have rebuked questions about the arrangement as “categorically ridiculous and false” and suggested that truth-seekers in the matter are “people who do not want an East African, Muslim woman elected to office.”

*if as Democrats maintain, marriage is solely about “feelings” then they have no logical reason to oppose sibling marriage for whatever reason

Posted in UNCATEGORIZED | Comments Off on Ilhan Omar is the Democrat Party

Articles that tripped our trigger this morning

  • Note: We have a high capacity magazine in operation most days
  • Constitutional “roots” no longer being necessary a socially conservative court can grow the constitution without regard to history as history no longer matters, only the here and now.

Justice Clarence Thomas yesterday issued a very powerful indictment of what is behind the abortion mentality – the movers and shakers – it is that it is steeped in eugenics. His analysis is readily supported by the history of the rhetoric and the statistical results of abortion on demand.  Abortion promoters are not necessarily liberals but they have a Nazi gene and this writer has no doubt they would force abortion, like China, directly or indirectly, given the power to do so.  It is power which they pursue relentlessly, including the takeover of health care and constant agitation to make as many people as possible complicit, all while inculcating the ethics of abortion into our schools and media. Actually eugenics of a sort is the underside of most support for abortion, even quasi indifference to it.

Clarence Thomas Exposes Abortion as Part of Eugenics

“This case highlights the fact that abortion is an act rife with the potential for eugenic manipulation. From the beginning, birth control and abortion were promoted as means of effectuating eugenics. Planned Parenthood founder Margaret Sanger was particularly open about the fact that birth control could be used for eugenic purposes. These arguments about the eugenic potential for birth control apply with even greater force to abortion, which can be used to target specific children with unwanted characteristics,” Thomas wrote. “Even after World War II, future Planned Parenthood President Alan Guttmacher and other abortion advocates endorsed abortion for eugenic reasons and promoted it as a means of controlling the population and improving its quality. As explained below, a growing body of evidence suggests that eugenic goals are already being realized through abortion.”

As Terry Jeffrey explains the recent decision to essentially sustain a lower court ruling disallowing regulation of sex selection and eugenic abortion is not necessarily the end of the matter as supposedly SCOTUS waits for differences in appellate rulings before they take a case. So if another appellate court issues a conflicting opinion – a possibility – then it becomes ripe for SCOTUS to decide. Frankly, as I believe Thomas would agree if he has not said it, the issue is ripe for reconsideration for a host of reasons. But then perhaps we need another vacancy to be filled  by a real conservative with guts like Thomas.

Related reading here.

The title of this article, Will the Left’s ‘Living’ Constitution Again be Used to ‘Kill’ the Unborn?  reminded us that the left’s convenient belief that the Constitution is a “living document” in their minds means five SCOTUS justices can alter it anytime they want (of course they assume they will follow leftist traits but if not they then will become devotees of “precedent” or stare decisis).  That is their view, rather than referring to”living” as in timeless because of principles it contains.

What they forget  is that their “living” means any SCOTUS can interpret the peoples’ will or the mores of the times or science and alter (interpret ) the Constitution as a matter of “current” justice or something. SCOTUS can issue a rolling interpretation of the right to abortion, reliance on Roe and Doe and much of their early progeny is not necessary.  Thus a new socially conservative court can can have its way with the document as what defense do “living document” proponents have when it can be claimed a more recent court is merely responding to what is best, in a living changing world. Someone else gets to do the  amending thank you very much.

R Mall

Posted in UNCATEGORIZED | Comments Off on Articles that tripped our trigger this morning

Ten Delusions of the Left . . .

By Don Feder writing at Grasstops USA  (note our addenda to item 10)

Ten Ways The Left Is Delusional, Deranged And Detached From Reality

Someone on Facebook asked: What one-word best describes leftists? Answers included fanatic, arrogant, hypocritical, elitist, totalitarian and – that old standby – evil.

I prefer “delusional,” as in “characterized by or holding idiosyncratic beliefs or impressions that are contradicted by reality or rational argument, typically as a symptom of mental disorder.”

When their delusion is challenged, the afflicted often become agitated, verbally abusive and/or physically violent.

For instance, at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, a pro-life demonstrator holding a poster that graphically showed the results on an abortion was assaulted by a female student who called him a “f**king terrible person,” and punched him repeatedly in the face and stomach. She was arrested and charged with assault.

At about the same time, in Philadelphia, State Representative Brian Sims accosted a group of women (some elderly, others in their teens) quietly praying outside a Planned Parenthood clinic, shouting “What makes you think it’s your job to tell women what’s right for their bodies?” He then offered to pay anyone who could provide the ladies’ personal information, so that they could be harassed on the Internet. Sims was so proud of his performance that he recorded and posted it.

Here are some of the more popular delusions held by leftists – from street thugs to politicians. But I repeat myself.

1. Don’t tell women what to do what their bodies. Abortion is a choice; the child is irrelevant.

It’s not about the woman’s body, but another body temporarily inside hers. There’s detailed information readily available on the stages of fetal development – when the child has a heartbeat, brainwaves, fingers and toes, and feels pain. For those who adhere to the deluded belief that the baby is a “thing,” an object to be disposed of for any reason, all is irrelevant. Neither evidence nor logic (how can two human beings produce a “thing”?) must be allowed to interfere with a choice which trumps reality. This is leading some abortion advocates to defend infanticide. If the child isn’t human moments before birth, why should it be human moments after birth?

2. Transgenderism – A man who thinks he’s a woman is a woman.

Here, once again, reality is determined subjectively. Others are compelled to endorse the delusion. Biologically, a man who believes he’s a woman is still a man. But such men are now allowed to compete in women’s sports and have access to ladies rest rooms and showers. In some jurisdictions, using the wrong pronoun (calling a man who “identifies as a woman” “he,” instead of “she,”) will land you in hot water. Transgenderism is the latest cause célèbre of the left.

3. There’s no crisis at the border.

To hold this bizarre belief, it helps to be lobotomized. The Border Patrol is overwhelmed, to the extent that growing military involvement is necessary. Caravans are forming up throughout Central America. Congress refuses to vote funds for a wall, reform an antiquated amnesty system, and end chain migration and anchor babies. In April, for the second month in a row, more than 100,000 illegals were apprehended at the southern border. The leading candidate for the Democratic presidential nomination, Joe Biden, wants to incentivize the influx by providing free health care to illegals. Besides the gang members, career criminals, and drug traffickers, disease is entering along with the alien horde. (Border Patrol agents are contracting diseases once rare to non-existent here.) Just as a child isn’t a child and a man who believes he’s a woman isn’t a man, a crisis that’s the chief threat to our nation’s security isn’t a crisis. Just close your eyes and wish it away.

4. Guns cause crime.

There are thousands of laws restricting access to firearms at the federal, state and local level. But every time there’s a school shooting, the cry goes up for “tighter” gun laws, or laws that “restrict easy access to guns.” In 2018, there were 561 homicides in the Windy City, the highest total in the United States. It’s as easy to possess a gun legally in Chicago as it is to build a synagogue in Mecca. Luckily, criminals, hotheads, fanatics and whack-jobs always follow the law. (Nod your head in ascent.) For liberals, it’s easier to blame objects (guns), than people (criminals).

5. Socialism helps the poor.

Before anyone can be helped, a nation needs to generate wealth. The notion that socialism helps the poor is amply refuted everywhere it’s been tried – Cuba, Venezuela, North Korea, Iran, Russia and Eastern Europe (during 70 years of communism). Where were the poor better off: East or West Germany, Taiwan or China (before the move toward capitalism), North or South Korea (today), Venezuela or Costa Rica. Capitalists need an incentive to produce wealth, in order for there to be income to redistribute. Winston Churchill said, “Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy; its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery.”

6. Man-made global warming, due to carbon-emissions, is established, incontrovertible scientific fact.

They cook the data, ignore inconvenient evidence, ridicule and slander dissidents, and make apocalyptic predictions of doom about polar ice caps melting to the size of ice cubes and rising sea-levels flooding the Eastern Seaboard. What was the science of global warming has become the religion of global warming. Self-avowed socialist Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez has a plan to wreck the economy and explode the national debt at a cost of only $92.9 trillion over a decade, or $419,000 per household. Who would buy a Cloud Cuckoo Land proposal dreamed up by someone whose last job was tending bar? At last count, six Democratic Senators running for president were on board.

7. Islam is the religion of peace.

Think Iran, Afghanistan, Yemen, Pakistan (any old stan), Al-Qaeda, ISIS, Hamas, Hezbollah, Boko Haram, the Muslim Brotherhood, the Palestinian Authority, 9/11, the Boston Marathon Bombing, the Pulse Night Club massacre, missiles from Gaza, the rise of anti-Semitism in Europe, honor killings, holy war, Christian persecution, and the worldwide slaughter of infidels that always accompanies Ramadan. The left thinks Christians are a danger to church-state separation and Jews in Israel will start World War III, but Islam is the religion of peace.

8. A “Two-State” solution will resolve the conflict between Israelis and Palestinians.

Except for Germans under the Third Reich, never has there been a group of people less inclined to peace than those known as Palestinians. Their mosques preach Jew-hatred; their schools teach Jew-hatred. They pay pensions to the families of suicide bombers and name city squares after them. They have never offered to recognize Israel under any circumstances, regardless of the inducement. And still the party of surrender prattles about a negotiated settlement, land for peace and a two-state solution – while excoriating Israel for defending itself.

9. Free Speech isn’t free speech if they don’t like what you’re saying.

Among other things, the University of North Carolina assailant shouted “trigger words” to justify her violent, physical attack on a pro-lifer – one of the many excuses the left has for denying the First Amendment rights of others. There are also campus speech codes, “safe spaces,” and hate crime laws. Remember the 1960s, when the left started the Berkeley Free Speech movement. Now, you need their permission to speak freely. And yet they still claim to be champions of the First Amendment.

10. Trump colluded with the Russians to influence the 2016 election.

After almost two years, $25 million and a 448-page report based on tens of thousands of pages of testimony and supporting documents, Mueller and his team of pro-Democrat investigators found no evidence of collusion between Moscow and Trump. For the left, that’s not enough. Besides demanding the unredacted report,* nearly every Democratic committee chairman in the House wants to investigate something that they suspect will prove POTUS is an agent of the Kremlin. Speaking of suspending disbelief, the collusion charge is based on the logic-defying assumption that Putin wanted Trump to win, because he wanted a president who would rebuild our military, make America energy-independent, revitalize our economy and attack his proxies all over the world. In other words, he’s nuts.

The American left boogies to the Disney song. “When you wish upon a star, makes no difference who you are. Anything your heart desires will come to you. If your heart is in your dreams, no request is too extreme. When you wish upon a star as dreamers do.”

But dreams become nightmares, children die, economies are ruined, the poor starve, and predators are let loose on society. Maybe they should change the title to “When You Wish Upon a Red Star.”

Don Feder is a former Boston Herald writer who is now a political/communications consultant. He also maintains a Facebook page.

* It is just delicious however duplicitous that at the same time they demand no redactions to the Mueller report they oppose Trump allowing AG Barr to declassify intelligence reports pertinent to the Democrat Russian delusion story and FISA warrant scam they brought against Trump and the American people.    R Mall

Posted in UNCATEGORIZED | Comments Off on Ten Delusions of the Left . . .

Democrat – Russian collusion against V’PAC

When it rains it pours and it has been doing that most days of late hereabouts. Your editor was swamped  almost literally with projects that needed to be attended to and then in the time slot allotted for erudition on these pages my water heater broke.  It’s a liberal Democrat conspiracy I tell you. So no browser problem or platform issue to blame for my Memorial Day lapse.

Posted in UNCATEGORIZED | Comments Off on Democrat – Russian collusion against V’PAC

Ilhan Omar the nasty little twit

THE DEMOCRATS CELEBRATE ILHAN OMAR’S ANTI-AMERICAN POSITION; THE GOP CENSURES STEVE KING TO APPEASE THE LEFT’S MISREPRESENTATIONS OF HIM

Ilhan Omar deserves neither the scorn nor the publicity from patriotic Americans and the ‘All Things Left’ so loved by the Media

It’s a bit ironic that in her native country Omar would be told to keep her mouth shut and pity her if she slandered the country’s leadership regime, but here she is free to talk trash to fulfill her hopes this country will turn into one where she is forced to keep her mouth shut

Omar is an ungrateful, hateful twit who would be more ‘at home’ in her native Somalia with all its “compassion'” and “generosity”!

In response to Ms. Omar, I would ask “what respect is owed to parents who would subject their young children to the gross hazards of the illegal journey to America because they’re told if you bring a child you’re sure to gain all the ‘good stuff’ America is so generous to give?”

“How Many More Children Must Die?” – Ilhan Omar Accuses US of Atrocities on Border

Following the smear by Rep. Lauren Underwood (D-IL) that the Border Patrol is intentionally killing migrant children, fellow freshman Democrat leftist Rep. Ilhan Omar (MN) accused the United States of committing atrocities on the border.

Underwood’s inflammatory statement was made during a House hearing on Wednesday and was “taken down” by a majority committee vote on strict party lines 9-7 with 10 absent Democrats enabling the GOP a rare committee vote victory.   DLH

Via Gateway Pundit:

 After a dispute over comments by Rep. Underwood about the Trump admin. and the deaths of migrant children at the southern border, Republicans voted to have her comments removed from the record. https://t.co/T1A4EaOSHn pic.twitter.com/9IUQrSo1DZ
— MSNBC (@MSNBC) May 22, 2019

Omar, who came to the U.S. in 1992 as a legal asylum seeker with her family from war-torn Somalia, tweeted on Thursday about the death of a sixth Central American migrant child in US custody in the past eight months, accusing the U.S. of committing “atrocities”:

“How many more children must die before we address the atrocities our country is committing at our southern border?”

How many more children must die before we address the atrocities our country is committing at our southern border? https://t.co/0W5TQ6Of8V
— Ilhan Omar (@IlhanMN) May 23, 2019

Omar keyed off a USA Today article that reported on the deceased child’s care:

The death toll of migrant children in U.S. custody in the past year rose to six on Wednesday after federal authorities acknowledged that a 10-year-old girl from El Salvador died eight months ago after being detained by border agents.
Ironically, the child — who died Sept. 29 — was the first migrant minor to die in U.S. custody in the past year. But her death was not reported by authorities until Wednesday, when CBS News broke the story.

…Mark Weber, a spokesperson for the Health and Human Services, said in a statement to CBS News that the girl had a history of congenital heart defects. When she entered the care of an Office of Refugee Resettlement (ORR) facility in San Antonio, Texas, on March 4, 2018, she was in a “medically fragile” state, Weber said.

“Following a surgical procedure, complications left the child in a comatose state. She was transported to a nursing facility in Phoenix, Arizona, for palliative care in May after release from a San Antonio hospital,” Weber said. “On September 26, she was transferred to an Omaha, Neb., nursing facility to be closer to her family. On September 29, the child was transported to Children’s Hospital of Omaha where she passed due to fever and respiratory distress.”

Meanwhile, the Democrats like Omar are silent about the dead children drowned trying to cross the Rio Grande this past month, presumably because those deaths can’t be directly blamed on President Trump and the United States.

The body of a child has been recovered and 3 people are missing after the raft they were using to cross the Rio Grande River capsized last night. A total of 9 migrants were in the raft. A #USBP agent jumped into the river and rescued a woman and a 6-year-old child.
— CBP (@CBP) May 3, 2019

Some recent “atrocities” committed by CBP along the border:

3-month-old in intensive care after rescue from Rio Grande by Eagle Pass Border Patrol agents. Father faces felony charge for re-entry after deportation. Read more here: https://t.co/0vuUoc1wyT #USBP#CBP pic.twitter.com/blMNsa91KN
— CBP South Texas (@CBPSouthTexas) May 17, 2019

#BorderPatrol agents rescued a family stranded in the Rio Grande River after they attempted to cross the river in an inflated kiddie pool. Details: https://t.co/gHkvNnlPxo pic.twitter.com/BN93bZOMW0
— CBP (@CBP) May 16, 2019

#BORDERNEWS According to the National Border Patrol Council Laredo, several Border Patrol agents rescued a family that almost drowned when trying to cross the Rio Grande by Eagles Pass yesterday.
The agents jumped into the water to rescue the children.

Posted in UNCATEGORIZED | Comments Off on Ilhan Omar the nasty little twit