How are future ‘artists’ going to out do Cardi B?

In the previous post, we asked a question related to Cardi B’s disappointment with us pitiful “Republicans” who, for some silly reason did not see the “unique” way her song “WAP” portrayed ‘true love’.

We asked how future ‘artists’ would be able to outdo Ms. B’s ‘over the top’ raunchy song. For a reason which totally befuddled the singer, we wondered how a song, regarded as a top hit for 2020, lyrics of which were so gross, vulgar, and sexually explicit (a 100 on a scale of 1 to 10), could be topped by singers in the future.

But then we thought, actually, the opportunities are limitless given the fact that WAP has opened the door to “musical interpretation” of any sex act, perverse, grotesque, disgusting, or otherwise.

Actual picture of Cardi B posted by her, imparting dialogue has become a popular meme

As we reported on another occasion, Cardi’s “WAP” is National Public Radio’s choice for “Number One Song of 2020”!

Imagine how delirious NPR would be over a future song that celebrated multiple sex acts by a full cast of characters including ‘numerous genders’, of various ages, races, (species?) using an array of  sex toys, machines, and devices.

And there will be an “artist” who recognizes this…in the very near future. One prediction: Soon , your 12 year old will be ‘singing along’ with a recording by the likes of Cardi B. to NPR’s “Best Song of All Time”!

Yep…time’s they are ‘a-changin’.
———————-

“I grew up listening to ‘freaky’ and ‘nasty’ music all my life”: Cardi B

And, now, she wonders why there was so much “criticism” and “backlash” toward her hit song “WAP”; must be those “right-wingers” (who, Cardi is presumably convinced, voted for Trump; and it’s ‘all ’cause they know she endorsed Biden”.)

As “B” tells it, she grew up listening to that kind of music”…, “why should you mind if your kids do?” seems to be her message.

And, with Biden’s eager acceptance of Cardi B’s “endorsement”, it seems that’s “Joey’s” message as well.

(It may also provide a clue to the kind of household and parenting Ms. B had as a child. And, now she’s seems to be promoting the same for everyone else’s!)

But, that’s just us…WAP! WAP!

dlh

Posted in UNCATEGORIZED | Comments Off on How are future ‘artists’ going to out do Cardi B?

Republicans are prudes and Cardi B says she was a chip off the ol’ block

  • So saying the songs aren’t for HER child ring a little hollow
  • The girl’s a poet and you just don’t know it

How could anybody think that a ‘beautiful love song’ like “Wet Ass Pussy” (WAP)
could be “freaky” or “nasty”?

Only a “Republican”

– Cardi says it’s those “Republican Motherf—–s” who think this beautiful song is “so nasty”, “freaky”.

– She also said she “grew up listening to freaky” and “nasty” music all her life.

– Huh?

“Other people might think its ‘strange and vulgar’, (this “Rhodes scholar” says,) “but to me it’s almost like really normal…you know what I’m sayin…'”

– The article emphasizes that Cardi didn’t get the backlash from “elected officials”… “not senators and shit like that”!        dlh

CARDI B SLAMS REPUBLICAN CRITICS, BLAMES THEM FOR BACKLASH TO HIT SONG “WAP”

The singer collaborated on the adult track with Megan Thee Stallion

Cardi B says she noticed that a majority of the negative reactions to her hit song “WAP” in August came from Republican influencers.

The singer and rapper released the song in collaboration with Megan Thee Stallion and it quickly became one of the summer’s biggest hits. However, given the graphic and adult nature of the song, it also faced criticism that the star now says was mostly from the right.
Speaking with Apple Music’s Zane Lowe, the 28-year-old explained that she was surprised that people reacted so much to the song, arguing that she grew up listening to “nasty” and “freaky” music all her life.

“When ‘WAP’ came out, the people that were criticizing it the most, they were like, ‘This is so nasty, this is so freaky’ — I don’t even think it was religious people, it was really a lot of Republicans,” she explained.

Cardi made sure to note that she didn’t get any backlash from elected officials, but said that social media influencers who typically court a right-leaning audience were among the song’s biggest critics.

“Big Republicans, not like senators and s— like that,” she said. “It was literally like those motherf—–s that got blue checks on Twitter, they’re big influencers and it’s just like… out of anything that y’all could have talked about?”

Cardi B was previously a vocal supporter of prominent Democrats in the 2020 election, first throwing her weight behind Bernie Sanders before pivoting over to Joe Biden once he became the presumptive nominee.

“I used to endorse Bernie [Sanders] and then Joe Biden, so they were just trying to figure a way out to pick on me,” she said. “Like, ‘Oh Joe Biden is this the girl you were doing that interview with? The girl that’s talking about WAP? That’s what you want America to be influenced by?'”

She added: “It’s like, bro, come on now.”

Cardi B previously defended the song during an appearance on the Australian radio show “The Kyle and Jackie O Show.”

“The people that the song bothers are usually conservatives or really religious people, but my thing is I grew up listening to this type of music,” Cardi explained at the time (via People). “Other people might think it’s strange and vulgar, but to me, it’s almost like really normal, you know what I’m saying?”

She also took to social media to defend herself from people calling her a hypocrite for not letting her 2-year-old daughter listen to the track.

“Ya needs to stop with this already! I’m not [JoJo Siwa]! I don’t make music for kids I make music for adults,” she said at the time.

Added the Grammy winner: “Parents are responsible on what their children listen too [sic] or see. I’m a very sexual person but not around my child just like every other parent should be.”

Posted in UNCATEGORIZED | 1 Comment

Gov. Reynolds ends most COVID-19 restrictions, good, but now we need an honest after action report

Governor Reynold’ COVID edicts, took a lot of liberties with the Iowa and Federal Constitution, and consequently from people.  Their livelihoods were adversely affected and consequently their general health. The benefits to lock-downs and general mask mandates  are not evident and inflicted suffering on many people, curtailing needed human interaction.

The precedent if the wrong lessons are learned are troubling. Instead of referencing the precedents her administration set for its excesses and avoiding those, versus building on them to even more authoritarian control and be even more aggressive would be horrid.

Frankly I believe the legislature should visit the emergency powers authority vested in the governor and limit them more, imparting time limits and oversight procedures and an onus on the legislature of prompt emergency sessions to exercise basic oversight.

For the record Reynolds was better than most governors (of course a lot of them are Democrats).  That she has been quicker to put a stop to to false political correctness regarding the disease as regards most mandates is good . . . but then don’t we pay her to be on top of this stuff . . .  to know when the public health cure is worse than the disease?

Politically I do not know how much different she might have been, more toward Governor Noem and DeSantis at the outset. Critics of Noem regarding South Dakota’s death rates per 100,000 are based on poor statistical modeling that constricts time frame when the disease has not played out and frankly cherry picks causes of death. What is South Dakota’s overall death rate per 100,000 seems more relevant because of iatrogenic diseases caused by excessive public health responses to the disease — especially as regards lock downs — which result in forgone care and diagnosis, depression, suicide drug addiction and more.  Attribution of the disease as cause of death is also rightly ridiculed in many cases.  States with draconian measures have fared worse.The so called curve analysis regarding communicable disease progression is also appropriate.  Responsibly one can favor Noem’s approach.

Certainly Reynolds could have been more skeptical of the CDC and her own Health Department. The “experts” and the data regarding general or extensive mask mandates have been all over the map and the latest studies (for months really) unsupportive. Many of the mask-Nazis “experts” have been  hypocritical or poor examples or both. The Iowa Health Department was so politicized (orange man references a certain cure therefor bad)  so as to in knee-jerk fashion promptly pull hydroxychloroquine from the medical community to be used as a COVID cure, sending out notices to every physician and pharmacist that use was not authorized.  Months ago the efficacy was more than sufficiently established demolishing arguments of cures being isolated or “mere” anecdotal.  While they have quietly removed the restrictions they unconscionably have not advised physicians and pharmacists as aggressively or uniformally as they denied it.

Hydroxychloroquine is not a panacea but for the general population in combination with other treatment regime or substituted by them if they are efficacious  this writer favors focusing on cures rather than experimental vaccines. The disease is 99% survivable for the largest swath of the population almost on its own. The right cures stop it and subsequently provide immunity.  Vaccines are not as effective generally.  The most vulnerable are a different story. And of course, as always, consult your physician.

R Mall

Posted in UNCATEGORIZED | Comments Off on Gov. Reynolds ends most COVID-19 restrictions, good, but now we need an honest after action report

BIDEN BESTOWS CONGRESSIONAL MEDAL OF HONOR ON CORTEZ (parody)

BIDEN BESTOWS CONGRESSIONAL MEDAL OF HONOR ON CORTEZ

IN AN  OVAL OFFICE CEREMONY THIS WEEK PRESIDENT BIDEN AWARDED A CONGRESSIONAL MEDAL OF HONOR TO ALEXANDRIA-OCASIO “Sandy” CORTEZ

This was the first time in American history that a civiilan, a female, an “admitted” former victim of sexual assault, and a sitting member of Congress was awarded the military’s highest honor.

The citation President Biden (attempted) to read as he bestows the medal, as written:

“Alexandria Ocasio Cortez is receiving this Medal for “uncommon valor and courage in the face of extreme threats by enemy guerrillas, under orders from the former president of the United States.

“Congressperson Cortez fought off attackers and secured safety for her staff and sister congresspersons. Despite assault by Trump voters, congressional Republican colleagues and ultra-conservative capitol police, Cortez stood her ground and singlehandedly fought off Trump loyalists as they attempted to take over the U.S. Government.”

In addition to her extraordinary courage in the face of brutal, attempted insurrection, Cortez has since provided comfort and solace to her male and female congressional colleagues, leading a formal psychological therapy session on the floor of the US Congress. It is believed (by Veritaspac sources) that Representative Cortez ‘s support and comfort saved her colleague, Rashid Tlaib, from a complete mental breakdown as she described her ordeal during the therapy session.

Had it not been for Congressperson Cortez’s long fingernails, biting profanity, her background in being raised in a ‘rough and tumble Bronx neighborhood’ and snippy combat training at Boston University, it is believed that the 2020 presidential election would have been overturned.

(Veritaspac believes the Medal of Honor is the highest award Cortez has received since the MIT Lincoln Library named a small asteroid after her: “23238 Ocasio-Cortez”, in gratitude for her research project for a high school science fair in 2007 on ‘the effect of antioxidants on the lifespan of the nematode “Caenorhabditis elegans” (Wikipedia).

Posted in UNCATEGORIZED | 1 Comment

“Soldier…let me see that tattoo …”

So, Biden’s Defense Secretary Austin is going to ADDRESS “WHITE NATIONALISM” and “extremism” in “the ranks”.

Does this mean that Secretary Austin, the “first black (AP says ‘black’ should be capitalized…Reuters!) defense secretary” will look for members of the military who have “Black Lives Matter” postings on their social media? or “Antifa”? or “La Resistance”? And “rid the military of them”?

OR, are none of those “extremist”?

OR, will this only apply to “Proud Boys’? Or, Knights of Columbus? Or, just the “extremists” and “hate groups” identified by the Southern Poverty Law Center: eg. American College of Pediatricians, American Border Patrol, American Family Assn., Center for Immigration Studies, etc

Hmmm?

I guess we’ll see…but I have my guesses…what’s yours?

Biden’s defense secretary Lloyd Austin will order troops to STAND DOWN in the next 60 days to ‘address white nationalism and extremism in the ranks’

Austin said there will be a pause in regular activities in the next 60 days
He underscored the need to rid the military of ‘racists and extremists’
Austin made history when he was confirmed as first black defense secretary
It comes after former military members participated in the Capitol siege

Very Scary Stuff                             dlh

Exclusive: Special Forces Warned Against Using Pepe the Frog, III%ers, Other ‘Extremist’ Symbols

Basically anything the left finds offensive — can Christian crosses be far behind?

Posted in UNCATEGORIZED | 1 Comment

Trump is winning election lawsuits, in case you haven’t heard-LifeSite News

Steven Mosher at LifeSite News.com (bold our emphasis)

Trump is winning election lawsuits, in case you haven’t heard

Trump has won two-thirds of the cases that have been adjudicated by the courts.

February 4, 2021 (LifeSiteNews) – Of late, I’ve felt more and more like I am back in Communist China. A place where every day, no matter what channel you turn on, what radio broadcast you listen to, or what online news service you subscribe to (except LifeSiteNews and a couple of others), the same dreary party line spews out.

The oligarchy is so confident that they can manipulate our very thoughts – after all, they control the search engines, the Twitter feeds, and the trending news – that they no longer even bother to hide what they do. Deleting President Trump’s account made it clear to the world what devious little Jack Dorsey spends his days doing: maniacally deleting accounts that deviate from his “truths.” And who doesn’t know by now that Mark Zuckerberg specializes in devising algorithms that are the hi-tech version of the mushroom treatment – keeping us in the dark and feeding us horse manure.

The party line with regard to the 2020 presidential election, aggressively promoted by America’s corporate media and Big Tech, is this: There was no election fraud because the courts have said so.

Both claims are false. Not just questionable, but dead wrong. 

By now, most people know that America’s corporate media and Big Tech have aggressively and punitively suppressed an open discussion of possible election irregularities.

But have you noticed that – to prop up their version of reality – they’ve simply stopped reporting on the dozens of ongoing lawsuits that are slowly wending their way through the court system? At most, they will simply make a blanket statement along the lines of “Trump has lost all the lawsuits that have come before the courts.”

Sometimes they will go further, and suggest that our justice system has thoroughly and impartially examined the claims of election fraud made in those suits, and have ruled that they are completely unfounded. 

Nothing could be further from the truth, as Physicist John Droz has discovered. Droz assembled a team of his fellow scientists and engineers – all volunteers – to take a close look at the lawsuits that have been filed, all of which are a matter of public record, and to summarize the results. This is no easy task, since there have been 80 lawsuits filed in connection with the 2020 presidential election by Trump or on his behalf, and each of these lawsuits consists of dozens of pages of filing and decisions.

The summary report, called “2020 Presidential Election Lawsuits Related to Election Integrity,” strips the excess verbiage of which lawyers are so fond, leaving the bare essentials of the lawsuits: What issues were at stake, how each case was treated by the courts, what evidence was objectively analyzed and, finally and most importantly, who won and who lost. 

So what did Droz and his team find?   

First, of the 80 total lawsuits, 34 have either been withdrawn, consolidated with other suits, or dismissed due to legal technicalities such as lack of standing, timing, or jurisdiction. Those judges who dismissed suits never heard the actual evidence of election irregularities and/or fraud, since they did not allow it to be presented in their courtrooms. Such cases cannot be counted as a loss for Trump. If anything, they are evidence of a failure of our judicial system to – at a moment of national crisis – actually address election fraud.

Of the 46 remaining lawsuits, 25 cases are still ongoing, so that the winner and loser of these cases is yet to be determined, while 21 have been completely adjudicated. These are cases where the court heard arguments, considered any relevant evidence, and then issued a formal ruling on the merits. 

You may be surprised to learn that, of these 21 cases, Trump has won 14 and lost 7.  

In other words, Trump has won two-thirds of the cases to date that have been adjudicated by the courts.  

Don’t expect to hear this on the evening news.

John Droz notes separately that, despite the widespread allegations of massive voter fraud:

“… only three (3) of these lawsuits materially dealt with voter illegalities (citizens voting twice, votes from deceased persons, etc.). Interestingly, all three of these cases are still open.”

“Further, just three (3) lawsuits addressed voting machine inaccuracies (purposeful or accidental). One of these was dismissed (due to jurisdiction), one was ruled against (although no discovery was granted), and one is still open (discovery was granted).”

“The likely explanation for so few cases in these two areas is that legally proving fraud or voting machine manipulations are very time-consuming processes, that require substantial investigative work and documentation. There simply wasn’t enough time to do this prior to key points in the process (like the Electoral College).”

Kudos to John Droz and his team for helping to educate the public about the ongoing legal efforts in ensure election integrity.  

I think everyone understands that, if we can be defrauded of our vote, we no longer live in a democracy. 

Posted in UNCATEGORIZED | Comments Off on Trump is winning election lawsuits, in case you haven’t heard-LifeSite News

Republicans in House really “live the bubble”

Oh many get back home frequently but prefer the bubble as it is eventually succor for them after retirement and they feel they can put off the unwashed back in the sticks.  How else do you explain the overwhelming vote against simply removing Liz Cheney from an internal caucus position. She was not being ousted from any non-political House committee assignment affecting her constituency. Leadership in the House is incredible, and not in a good way.

Cheney Keeps Post In House Leadership, Still Faces Challenges In Wyoming 

Oh we suspect she will be gone next term by the superior graces of Wyoming Republicans, but a chance to do the right thing for Republican unrest nationwide was walked away from. Perhaps more comparing this, Steve King and Congressman Green later.

Posted in UNCATEGORIZED | Comments Off on Republicans in House really “live the bubble”

FORMER SCOTT COUNTY REPUBLICAN CHAIRMAN APPEARS ON CNN DON LEMON

Surprise! Unjustified accusations (roll tape  of Trump January 6 comments)) and making an appearance on virulently anti-Trump CNN and in particular rabidly anti-Trump Don Lemon’s show as some sort of Republican martyr gets you 4 minutes of fame along with your QCTimes story.  As Donald Trump would Tweet: SAD!

Embedded video below screen grab.

The subtitle fits the narrative of ~~principled~~ GOP Chairman who does the right thing. Probably intended to suggest he also resigned from the Party (he has not) otherwise why would they impart syntax of “former” with “resigns”. He had already resigned which made him former weeks ago. A more accurate titling consistent with the story would be ~~ “Chairman of Scott County GOP asked (told) to resign after calling for Trump’s Impeachment over riot” Prior to the Jan. 6th preponderantly peaceful assemblage, Millage had already let it be known he would not be running again as Chairman. So he gave up no power or influence and given the level of outrage would not likely have survived an “impeachment” vote aimed at him. (can we say “aimed”)

 

Readers will remember our report  back on January 8th the day the news broke that Millage had without evidence made an easily debunked accusation that President Donald Trump incited violence claiming his words  at the January 6th DC rally were an impeachable offense.

Scott County GOP Leadership Needs to Remove Chairman Dave Millage

In viewing the video it seems at first blush that Millage did not  throw conservatism under the bus, but he did. He greatly hurt the party of conservatism locally, abetting calumnious charges of the left. His accusation and call for impeachment against Trump was not supportable by the facts, and politically it was incredibly hurtful locally, breeding contempt for the sincerity of the party apparat, and irresponsible as a party official to make such a baseless claim. Leaders let the smoke clear before they start shooting, the fire was not friendly.  Thanks to the reader who sent the link to the video.

Posted in UNCATEGORIZED | 2 Comments

Proposed Resolutions for County Republican Central Committees

Local political activist and former multi-term Scott County Republican Chairman Susan Frazer sends this list of election integrity /security subject matter reforms from the work of an ad hoc group of fellow activists.  They are intended to be introduced at central committee meetings, serve as action items and percolate up to the state party. No doubt presenters will flesh them out upon introduction of the items.

RESOLVED Clean up voter rolls
i.e. 20 counties exceed 100% registration

RESOLVED Eliminate same day voter registration

RESOLVED Tighten absentee vote window

RESOLVED Standardized recount process in all counties and precincts

RESOLVED Outlaw outside private funding of our public elections
i.e. Center for Tech and Civic Life (CTCL) funding to counties

RESOLVED Full transparency, outlaw voting machines with network connectivity

ACTION PLAN
Assuming resolution(s) pass, ask CC to send them to all elected officials
County, State and Federal

SCR (Scott County Republican Party) issue press release of resolutions

Forward resolution to State Central Committee, ask for distribution to
all county committees

Ask all members of the SCR to forward individually to our elected officials
at all levels of government, provide email contacts

We would add an item to insure chain of custody and enhanced security of all official ballots before and after voting.  More on the matter later.

Posted in UNCATEGORIZED | Comments Off on Proposed Resolutions for County Republican Central Committees

About those Bushies vacating the Republican Party

They aim to be back in the good graces of their betters:

 

We are told: “dozens” of grifters complain the GOP is a “Trump cult” now and “are leaving” the Party

(Reuters) – Dozens of Republicans in former President George W. Bush’s administration are leaving the party, dismayed by a failure of many elected Republicans to disown Donald Trump after his false claims of election fraud sparked a deadly storming of the U.S. Capitol last month.

Mind you, something like 75 million Americans had their votes counted for Trump which is more than four years ago, and way more than either of the Bushes ever received

Just for size perspective there were 70 million registered Catholics in their most recent count, and people of no religion are of, oh probably about Trumpist size using Pew figures

This Trump cult is a growing phenomena!!

Cults are usually measured in maybe dozens up to maybe a few hundred. Definitely more their size.

Now none of this Trump hating cult would likely survive a primary as  the “most conservative that can win” having emerged from their closet  (it would not need to be very roomy).

AND WHO THE HECK ARE THEY?

‘Jimmy Gurule’?, ‘Kris Purcell’?, ‘Rosario Marin’?, ‘Suzy DeFrancis’? Wow! How we gonna get along without these “big guns”? !

We never heard of this bunch…what a huge loss to the Party . Wonder why GW and JEB haven’t announced; maybe they think they ARE the GOP now?

Word is to gain entry to the group they flagellate themselves, disclaiming the GOP in order to gain acceptance back in their desired social circle, . . . or maybe that was flatulate. Hard to tell from the hidden camera of their (re) initiation rite.

Posted in UNCATEGORIZED | 1 Comment