Absurd Times

Here are a few memes courtesy HP to delight and motivate. Readers are encouraged to send us their  favorite political commentary. We delight in the absurd.

Nothing is more absurd in these absurd times than many of the Corona virus policies we see emanating from government, businesses and individuals.

Send us your comments on the absurd, ridiculous, hypocritical, things you see. One example would be seeing people wearing face masks outdoors on a bike path with no one around.  Little vignettes from shopping, driving or work would be welcome. And of course pithy memes like these:

 

Posted in UNCATEGORIZED | Comments Off on Absurd Times

Wasn’t it Michele Obama who said, “When they go low, we go ‘high’?

“High” on what, Michele?     dlh

Raising kids the “Democrat way”?

Adults Have Portland Toddlers Hold Anti-Cop Signs and Repeat ‘F*ck the Police’ 

Toddlers Hold Signs and Say ‘F— the Police’ Outside Portland Courthouse, Raise Black Power Fist

There will be protest etiquette lessons offered, online of course so as to protect the young belligerents.

Posted in UNCATEGORIZED | Comments Off on Wasn’t it Michele Obama who said, “When they go low, we go ‘high’?

THIS (?) is the “sports” everyone has missed during the Covid lockdown’ ??

  • Uniforms on NBA, NFL and likely MLB to be social justice billboards – but only leftist messages approved so far
  • Where’s the revenue stream in that!
  • Anyone expect that “All Lives Matter” will be allowed?
  • How about: “Respect the Police”; “Graduate High School”;  “Marriage Good for Kids” Right to Life; Bill of Rights; Cancel Culture;

Now these ‘oppressed’ athletes certainly deserve the admiration of all fans!   Not!

Major League Baseball pans cops, America as ALL Yankees and Nationals players kneel to BLM

This is no longer America’s pastime.

As an organization, MLB is against America.       dlh

Days After Signing $365 Million Contract, Baseball Superstar Kneels During National Anthem

Mookie Betts was traded from the Boston Red Sox to the Los Angeles Dodgers on February 10. He signed an extension worth $365 million over 12 years with L.A on July 22.

Betts received a $65 million signing bonus, the largest in the sport’s long history.
He won the American League MVP in 2018, and he’s a four-time Gold Glove winner. He’s also a perennial all-star and widely considered the second best player in MLB, behind Mike Trout of the Los Angeles Angels.

On July 23, every player from both games played on Opening Day took a knee before the anthem in a show of solidarity. However, Betts (and a couple players from the San Francisco Giants) took a knee during the anthem.

Hey MLB! Take your game North Korea; NBA let’s see you criticize CCP society IN China

 

At least there’s a few athletes who have an IQ higher than their uniform number: San Francisco Giants pitcher Sam Coonrod refused to kneel during the national anthem Thursday night against the Dodgers.

According to NBC Sports, members of the Giants took a knee during the national anthem, and Coonrod didn’t join them. Every member of both teams also kneeled before the anthem. The pitcher also didn’t participate in that action. The reason why? His Christian faith. (RELATED: David Hookstead Is The True King In The North When It Comes To College Football)

“I’m a Christian, like I said, and I just can’t get on board with a couple of things that I have read about Black Lives Matter. How they lean toward Marxism and they’ve said some negative things about the nuclear family. I just can’t get on board with that,” Coonrod explained to the media, according to the same NBC Sports report.

It’s everywhere now!

NBA, union approve list of social justice messages for jerseys during restarted 2020 season: report

NBA Criticized for Barring ‘FreeHongKong’ on Personalized Merchandise

Report: NFL to allow players to display social justice messages on helmets

Posted in UNCATEGORIZED | Comments Off on THIS (?) is the “sports” everyone has missed during the Covid lockdown’ ??

An urgent read for those who are considering voting Democrat this year

A thoughtful…and very accurate piece about the current unrest in America and the kind of future a Joe Biden presidency would be

Everyone should read this before they vote (beginning in September for most) and that includes those liberals who think the Democrats Will “Keep America Great”!    Posted at Real Clear Politics:

LAWLESS DEMOCRAT-RUN CITIES PREVIEW JOE BIDEN’S AMERICA

“People will do what they do,” House Speaker Nancy Pelosi shrugs.
It’s not just tearing down statues of Columbus. Or of Washington, Lincoln, or Douglass.

Mobs light churches on fire. They attack federal police officers with bricks, urine, feces, and pigs’ feet. They blind law enforcement officers with lasers. They burn down pawn shops with a man still inside, only discovered months after the news cameras left town. Yes, people – radical, America-hating domestic terrorists, to be precise – do evil things. When Democrats let them.

This is what is happening in countless Democrat-controlled cities. In Portland, Seattle, Chicago, Minneapolis, Atlanta, and New York crime is skyrocketing, police are defunded and ordered to disengage. Law-abiding citizens suffer, while Joe Biden and Democrats give cover to so-called “peaceful protesters” who are sharpening PVC pipes to use against cops protecting public property.

After over 50 days of rioting in Portland, federal law enforcement had to do the job Democratic Mayor Ted Wheeler refuses to do. Their reward for being pelted with firecrackers and feces? They are maligned by Democrats. House Majority Whip Jim Clyburn smears brave officers as Nazis. Pelosi spreads disinformation about “unidentified stormtroopers” when uniforms with big bold “police” letters had to be stripped of officer names because dozens were “doxxed,” their homes and families targeted. This is “peaceful,” according to Joe Biden, who says it is police who “become the enemy,” and “yes, absolutely” funding should be redirected. Also known as defunding.

Democrats are defunding the police to replace it with the thought police. In Ilhan Omar’s Minneapolis, the far-left city council hires private security, while it dismantles the police and leaves citizens to suffer with double the homicides. In New York City, business owners are threatened, while criminals go free. Shootings are up 130%, murders up 30%, burglaries up 118%, but arrests are down by 40,000 from last year. While New York descends into lawlessness, the district attorney continues political witch hunts against the president. 

And what of the hard-working taxpayer, the small-business owner, or the single mom trying to provide for her kids? Their businesses aren’t protected. Their schools are closed, in defiance of the best science and all reason.

Meanwhile, the risk for kids trapped in Democrat-run cities is dire. Seven children were killed in two weeks in Chicago, including Sincere Gaston, a 20-month-old shot while riding with her mother in the car. The same was true for 8-year-old Secoriea Turner in Atlanta, in an area Mayor Keisha Lance Bottoms abandoned. Davell Gardner Jr., just 1 year old, was shot and killed in his stroller at a cookout in Brooklyn.

In Seattle, Mayor Jenny Durkan is “building a just and equitable future” – for the far left and no one else. Government workers are sent to reeducation camp to renounce their “whiteness.” Job creators who achieve the American Dream are punished with a tax, while the city uses their tax dollars to hire library administrators required to be “knowledgeable in the area of race and social justice,”  at six-figure salaries.

Durkan gave a “safe space” for radical leftists to take over a police precinct and a major portion of the city, resulting in two teenagers being shot and killed. The “comrades” at CHAZ/CHOP endorsed Joe Biden.

And why wouldn’t they? These dystopias are just a preview of Joe Biden’s America. His unity task force with socialist Bernie Sanders revealed the Democrats’ vision: no borders, no deportations, and no school choice. Biden and Sanders “reimagine public safety” with no cash bail, nationalizing the disastrous policy in New York that puts assaulters, arsonists, and child pornographers back on the street. It promises Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez’s Green New Deal, a “clean energy revolution” that would destroy the American way of life by 2035.

The dangerous ideology of the radical left isn’t confined to Venezuela or the Soviet Union. The political application of justice, the heightened inequality, indoctrination, lawlessness, and loss of opportunity is playing out in our cities, the culmination of decades of one-party Democratic rule. 

President Trump will stand up against the left-wing mob and restore peace and prosperity. He will continue to offer a helping hand to Democratic governors and mayors, whose concerns lie with politics, not their people. He will keep America free and defend the brave. 

And come Nov. 3, the people will do what America does: let the voice of freedom be heard loud and clear.

Liz Harrington is the national spokesperson for the Republican National Committee.

Posted in UNCATEGORIZED | Comments Off on An urgent read for those who are considering voting Democrat this year

The “news” folks at the Journal will always have Peggy

PEGGY NOONAN BREATHES IN BIDEN’S NOSTRILS*

Hopes to give him life

– “And it’s always possible Joe Biden will awaken to the moment we’re in, see that a leader isn’t someone who sits back in a sunny, well-appointed suburban room and watches, passively, as dramatic events unfold. He could emerge as a real leader with a series of statements putting forth guiding principles to weather our crises. We have problems with race, problems with the police. What rearrangements should be made? How do we make them nonviolently, democratically? What is the meaning of history? What is a statue? What is socialism? What is the path?

– “He is bowing to the ancient political wisdom that you should never interrupt a man while he’s destroying himself. And he’s afraid of being on the wrong side of rising progressive forces. But thoughtfulness and seriousness would put him squarely with wavering Trump supporters and the honestly undecided, and reassure them that a vote for him is not also a vote for unchecked extremism and mayhem.”

https://www.wsj.com/news/author/peggy-noonan
——-

Our comments:

Mostly I blow hot air, but if it will help ol’ Joe . . .

Peggy Noonan, the aging, bitter, has-been columnist at the Wall Street, has penned another column attempting to belittle President Donald Trump, and promote the comic candidacy of Joe Biden. Not unusual for Peggy. Never, in our opinion, a conservative, nor even an admirer of any Republican, though she served in both GHW Bush and Ronald Reagan’s administrations. She was primarily a speechwriter in both, and, in our view one of their biggest mistakes, especially poor old GHW.

Peggy is always touted as a gifted writer and credited with creating for Bush such ‘memorable phrases’ as “a thousand points of light” and ” a kinder, gentler nation”. But Peggy’s way with words also led to her biggest ‘fail’ and President Bush’s ‘misfortune’ as well as the national tragedy of the Bill Clinton election. It was Peggy who penned the “Read my lips, no new taxes” for Bush in his ’88 GOP nomination acceptance speech, which led to his ’92 reelection loss to Clinton.

Later, Peggy became especially bitter toward GW Bush for his failure to bring her into his administration after she had so ‘effectively run the Reagan White House’ (at least in her mind, we believe).

As one might expect, Peggy ‘s later columns betrayed her ‘affection’ for Obama and his ‘many successes’. And now Peggy hopes to “breathe life into the Biden campaign, and, like the nurses at Walter Reed, “get Joe moving”.   dlh
———————————————-

The nostril comment

* “I had nurses at Walter Reed hospital who would bend down and whisper in my ear, go home and get me pillows. They would…actually breathe in my nostrils to make me move, to get me moving,” the former Delaware senator and Obama’s VP for eight years asserted.

They can no longer do this, however, “in COVID time,” he added, which is reassuring, assuming anyone buys this breathy anecdote in the first place.

“Perhaps this is why nearly 40% of likely voters believe that Biden, 77, is experiencing some form of dementia, including 20 percent of Democrats, according to a recent Rasmussen poll.” (BizPac)

Peggy conservative  column this week in the WSJ :  (mostly an attack on Trump and a hopeful lament for Biden to do better

Something shifted this month. Donald Trump’s hold on history loosened, and may be breaking. In some new way his limitations are being seen and acknowledged, and at a moment when people are worried about the continuance of their country and their own ability to continue within it. He hasn’t been equal to the multiple crises. Good news or bad, he rarely makes any situation better. And everyone kind of knows.

On Wednesday a Siena College/New York Times poll found Joe Biden ahead 50% to 36%. It’s a poll four months out, but it’s a respectable one and in line with others. (A week before, a Fox News poll had Mr. Biden leading 50% to 38%. The president denounced it as a fantasy.) This week’s poll had Mr. Biden leading among women by 22 points—a bigger lead than Hillary Clinton enjoyed in 2016. He has moderates by 33 points, independents by 21. On Thursday a separate Times/Siena poll had Mr. Trump losing support in the battleground states that put him over the top in 2016. His “once-commanding advantage among white voters has nearly vanished,” the Times wrote.

The latest White House memoir paints the president as ignorant, selfish and unworthy of high office. Two GOP House primary candidates the president supported lost their primaries resoundingly. Internet betting sites that long saw Mr. Trump as the front-runner now favor Mr. Biden. The president’s vaunted Tulsa, Okla., rally was a dud with low turnout. Senior officials continue to depart the administration—another economic adviser this week, the director of legislative affairs and the head of the domestic policy council before him. Why are they fleeing the ship in a crisis, in an election year?

Judgments on the president’s pandemic leadership have settled in. It was inadequate and did harm. He experienced Covid-19 not as a once-in-a-lifetime medical threat but merely a threat to his re-election argument, a gangbusters economy. He denied the scope and scale of the crisis, sent economic adviser Larry Kudlow out to say we have it “contained” and don’t forget to buy the dip. Mr. Trump essentially admitted he didn’t want more testing because it would result in more positives.

And the virus rages on, having hit blue states first and now tearing through red states in the South and West—Arizona, Florida, the Carolinas, Texas.

The protests and riots of June were poorly, embarrassingly handled. They weren’t the worst Washington had ever seen, they were no 1968, but still he wound up in the White House bunker. Then out of the bunker for an epically pointless and manipulative photo-op in front of a boarded-up church whose basement had been burned. Through it all the angry, blustering tweets issued from the White House like panicked bats fleeing flames in the smokestack.

It was all weak, unserious and avoidant of the big issues. He wasn’t equal to that moment either.

His long-term political malpractice has been his failure—with a rising economy, no unemployment and no hot wars—to build his support beyond roughly 40% of the country. He failed because he obsesses on his base and thinks it has to be fed and greased with the entertainments that alienate everyone else. But his base, which always understood he was a showman, wanted steadiness and seriousness in these crises, because they have a sense of the implications of things.

He doesn’t understand his own base. I’ve never seen that in national politics.
Some of them, maybe half, are amused by his nonsense decisions and statements—let’s ban all Muslims; let’s end this deadbeat alliance; we have the biggest, best tests. But they are half of 40%, and they would stick with him no matter what. He doesn’t have to entertain them! He had to impress and create a bond with others.

The other half of his base is mortified by his antics and shallowness. I hear from them often. They used to say yes, he’s rough and uncouth and unpolished, but only a rough man can defeat the swamp. Now they say I hate him and what he represents but I’ll vote for him because of the courts, etc. How a lot of Trump supporters feel about the president has changed. The real picture at the Tulsa rally was not the empty seats so much as the empty faces—the bored looks, the yawning and phone checking, as if everyone was re-enacting something, hearing some old song and trying to remember how it felt a few years ago, when you heard it the first time.

In the end, if the president loses, he’ll turn on them too. They weren’t there for him, they didn’t work hard enough, they’re no good at politics. “After all I did.”
That will be something, when that happens.

Nobody knows what’s coming. On New Year’s Eve we couldn’t imagine the pandemic, economic contraction and protests. We don’t know what will happen in the next four months, either. I believe in the phenomenon of silent Trump voters, people who don’t tell anyone, including pollsters, that they’re for him because they don’t want to be hassled. But eight, 10 or 14 points worth? No.

It’s generally thought that if the summer’s protests and demonstrations become riots again, if they’re marked by more violence and statues crashing to the ground, then Mr. Trump will benefit. This may be true. There will be powerful pushback if things are grim. But I’m not sure he will benefit. A sense that things have gone out of control under your watch does not help incumbents. A sense that he cannot calibrate his actions but will do any crazy thing to bolster his position will not help him. He is a strange man in a strange time, the old rules don’t necessarily apply.

It’s possible, but not likely, that a general calming will occur as progressive activists make progress in party primaries and corporate boardrooms, and as their ideological assumptions ascend in public life. They’ve already won and are winning a lot.

And it’s always possible Joe Biden will awaken to the moment we’re in, see that a leader isn’t someone who sits back in a sunny, well-appointed suburban room and watches, passively, as dramatic events unfold. He could emerge as a real leader with a series of statements putting forth guiding principles to weather our crises. We have problems with race, problems with the police. What rearrangements should be made? How do we make them nonviolently, democratically? What is the meaning of history? What is a statue? What is socialism? What is the path?

He is bowing to the ancient political wisdom that you should never interrupt a man while he’s destroying himself. And he’s afraid of being on the wrong side of rising progressive forces. But thoughtfulness and seriousness would put him squarely with wavering Trump supporters and the honestly undecided, and reassure them that a vote for him is not also a vote for unchecked extremism and mayhem.

Silence is short-term shrewd. Rising to the occasion, taking a chance, making a gamble when everything is going your way but the country needs more—that is long-term wise. And wise always beats shrewd in the end.

We had wondered if Mr. Trump can lead in a crisis. He cannot. Can Mr. Biden?

Posted in UNCATEGORIZED | Comments Off on The “news” folks at the Journal will always have Peggy

Wall Street Journal “newspeople” abhor facts apparently

  • Well, how about that?
  • The Leftist  “News ” Staff  at The Wall Street Journal tried to intimidate the newspapers Editorial Board
  • Maybe the news staff got ahead of themselves a bit
  • Dow Jones owns The Wall Street Journal, but Dow Jones is owned by News Corp. which is owned by Rupert Murdock
  • How long will the bifurcation between the editorial pages and the “news” pages last?

It was a sad day in Mudville for the “news” group

We have often criticized the ‘news’ side of the Wall street Journal (sometimes the ‘opinion side’ as well. Our ‘beef’ with the opinion side of the Journal has been almost exclusively due to its support for illegal immigration…on behalf of their Business and US Chamber of Commerce supporters.)

We have, however, felt that the paper’s opinion pages accurately and fairly present the conservative viewpoint…much moreso than nearly all other print (and broadcast) media.

Well, now, the folks of the Wall Street Journal’s “news” staff have finally been forthright enough to confirm that, ‘yes, indeed’ they are the progressive left “voice” of the Journal!

Until this morning, we were not aware that ‘some 280’ members of the Journal’s “news” staff signed a letter to the newspaper’s publisher ‘criticizing’ the (apparent less than desired leftist viewpoint of the) opinion pages. The “newsies” apparently hoped to have the Journal’s editorial board “change” its ‘principles’ and the pages’ ‘content’ (evidently to ‘better’ reflective ‘progressives’ viewpoint so popular with the rest of media).

Cheers for the WSJ’s editorial board for rejecting the left’s “cancel culture”.       dlh

Here’s the report as it was published in Friday’s edition:

“We’ve been gratified this week by the outpouring of support from readers after some 280 of our Wall Street Journal colleagues signed (and someone leaked) a letter to our publisher criticizing the opinion pages. But the support has often been mixed with concern that perhaps the letter will cause us to change our principles and content. On that point, reassurance is in order

In the spirit of collegiality, we won’t respond in kind to the letter signers. Their anxieties aren’t our responsibility in any case. The signers report to the News editors or other parts of the business, and the News and Opinion departments operate with separate staffs and editors. Both report to Publisher Almar Latour. This separation allows us to pursue stories and inform readers with independent judgment.

“It was probably inevitable that the wave of progressive cancel culture would arrive at the Journal, as it has at nearly every other cultural, business, academic and journalistic institution. But we are not the New York Times. Most Journal reporters attempt to cover the news fairly and down the middle, and our opinion pages offer an alternative to the uniform progressive views that dominate nearly all of today’s media.

“As long as our proprietors allow us the privilege to do so, the opinion pages will continue to publish contributors who speak their minds within the tradition of vigorous, reasoned discourse. And these columns will continue to promote the principles of free people and free markets, which are more important than ever in what is a culture of growing progressive conformity and intolerance.”

WSJ “newspeople” abhor facts apparently

Apparently this is the piece that so outraged the “professional journalists” (that’s spelled “biased leftist political hacks”) at the Wall Street Journal.

Perhaps these “news people” are concerned that truth and facts undermines the BLM’s, progressives’, the Democratic Party’s biased, partisan propaganda. They are apparently in the wrong line of work if fact makes them uneasy.  (highlighting in article below is ours).

By Heather Mac Donald
June 2, 2020

George Floyd’s death in Minneapolis has revived the Obama-era narrative that law enforcement is endemically racist. On Friday, Barack Obama tweeted that for millions of black Americans, being treated differently by the criminal justice system on account of race is “tragically, painfully, maddeningly ‘normal.’ ” Mr. Obama called on the police and the public to create a “new normal,” in which bigotry no longer “infects our institutions and our hearts.”

Joe Biden released a video the same day in which he asserted that all African-Americans fear for their safety from “bad police” and black children must be instructed to tolerate police abuse just so they can “make it home.” That echoed a claim Mr. Obama made after the ambush murder of five Dallas officers in July 2016. During their memorial service, the president said African-American parents were right to fear that their children may be killed by police officers whenever they go outside.

Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz denounced the “stain . . . of fundamental, institutional racism” on law enforcement during a Friday press conference. He claimed blacks were right to dismiss promises of police reform as empty verbiage.

This charge of systemic police bias was wrong during the Obama years and remains so today. However sickening the video of Floyd’s arrest, it isn’t representative of the 375 million annual contacts that police officers have with civilians. A solid body of evidence finds no structural bias in the criminal-justice system with regard to arrests, prosecution or sentencing.  Crime and suspect behavior, not race, determine most police actions.

In 2019 police officers fatally shot 1,004 people, most of whom were armed or otherwise dangerous. African-Americans were about a quarter of those killed by cops last year (235), a ratio that has remained stable since 2015. That share of black victims is less than what the black crime rate would predict, since police shootings are a function of how often officers encounter armed and violent suspects. In 2018, the latest year for which such data have been published, African-Americans made up 53% of known homicide offenders in the U.S. and commit about 60% of robberies, though they are 13% of the population.

The police fatally shot nine unarmed blacks and 19 unarmed whites in 2019, according to a Washington Post database, down from 38 and 32, respectively, in 2015. The Post defines “unarmed” broadly to include such cases as a suspect in Newark, N.J., who had a loaded handgun in his car during a police chase. In 2018 there were 7,407 black homicide victims. Assuming a comparable number of victims last year, those nine unarmed black victims of police shootings represent 0.1% of all African-Americans killed in 2019. By contrast, a police officer is 18½ times more likely to be killed by a black male than an unarmed black male is to be killed by a police officer.

On Memorial Day weekend in Chicago alone, 10 African-Americans were killed in drive-by shootings. Such routine violence has continued—a 72-year-old Chicago man shot in the face on May 29 by a gunman who fired about a dozen shots into a residence; two 19-year-old women on the South Side shot to death as they sat in a parked car a few hours earlier; a 16-year-old boy fatally stabbed with his own knife that same day. This past weekend, 80 Chicagoans were shot in drive-by shootings, 21 fatally, the victims overwhelmingly black. Police shootings are not the reason that blacks die of homicide at eight times the rate of whites and Hispanics combined; criminal violence is.

The latest in a series of studies undercutting the claim of systemic police bias was published in August 2019 in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. The researchers found that the more frequently officers encounter violent suspects from any given racial group, the greater the chance that a member of that group will be fatally shot by a police officer. There is “no significant evidence of antiblack disparity in the likelihood of being fatally shot by police,” they concluded.

A 2015 Justice Department analysis of the Philadelphia Police Department found that white police officers were less likely than black or Hispanic officers to shoot unarmed black suspects. Research by Harvard economist Roland G. Fryer Jr. also found no evidence of racial discrimination in shootings. Any evidence to the contrary fails to take into account crime rates and civilian behavior before and during interactions with police.

The false narrative of systemic police bias resulted in targeted killings of officers during the Obama presidency. The pattern may be repeating itself. Officers are being assaulted and shot at while they try to arrest gun suspects or respond to the growing riots. Police precincts and courthouses have been destroyed with impunity, which will encourage more civilization-destroying violence. If the Ferguson effect of officers backing off law enforcement in minority neighborhoods is reborn as the Minneapolis effect, the thousands of law-abiding African-Americans who depend on the police for basic safety will once again be the victims.

The Minneapolis officers who arrested George Floyd must be held accountable for their excessive use of force and callous indifference to his distress. Police training needs to double down on de-escalation tactics. But Floyd’s death should not undermine the legitimacy of American law enforcement, without which we will continue on a path toward chaos.

Ms. Mac Donald is a fellow at the Manhattan Institute and the author of “The War on Cops,” (Encounter Books, 2016).

Posted in UNCATEGORIZED | Comments Off on Wall Street Journal “newspeople” abhor facts apparently

“Jumpin’ Mittens Romney”

‘MITTENS’ TALKS ABOUT ‘CHARACTER’ AND ‘MY PARTY’

As far as ‘character’, none is evident with this disingenuous poser…and, ‘my party’? Which “party” is that, Mittens”? the BLM? the Communist? the newly ‘Disgraced Democratic” party?

“I have no idea what’s going to happen with my party. I represent a very small slice of my party. The party has taken a different course. My party was very strong anti-dictators, anti-authoritarian leaders, anti people like Kim Jong Un and Vladimir Putin, and now the party seems to be more comfortable with people like that,” Romney said.

“Romney told a Washington Post reporter that he was participating in the demonstration “to make sure that people understand that black lives matter.” The Utah senator later tweeted a photo of himself at the protest with the caption “Black Lives Matter,” becoming one of the most prominent GOP figures to do so.”

(We contend that “Mittens” is only waiting for the right time to do a “Jumpin’ Jim Jeffords”…switch parties when the most damage can be done to the GOP and he can derive the greatest advantage for himself  (like negotiating a juicy chairmanship.)

Posted in UNCATEGORIZED | 1 Comment

Only for appearances sake, Planned Parenthood distances itself from its racist founder

  • Even Planned Parenthood could not rely on the liberal media to be effective in covering  the truth about Margaret Sanger indefinitely.

Omar Khayyam, the Rubaiyat could have been writing about the Washington Post

The moving finger writes, and, having writ, moves on. Not all your piety nor wit can lure it back to cancel half a line”. (Omar Khayyam, the Rubaiyat)

WSJ’s excerpt from 16 years ago by Planned Murderhood

Posted below is an item from the Wall Street Journal’s “Notable and Quotable” feature — an excerpt from a “fact sheet” published by the Planned Parenthood Federation of America Inc. back in 2004. (bold our emphasis)

Against the background of today’s “Cancel Culture”, which seeks the obliteration of America’s history and removal of all statues and memorials to the people and events that ‘made America Great”, including the Founders and the US Constitution, Planned Parenthood staunchly remains ‘proud’ of its founder, Margaret Sanger. The repugnant Ms. Sanger had genuine contempt for her fellow Americans who didn’t quite meet her ‘high’ standards (including innocent yet unborn babies) and most certainly held racist views. If there is one influence that deserves to be erased from the history of this great nation, in our opinion, it is Margaret Sanger’s.          dlh

Wall Street Journal’s Notable & Quotable:

From “ Opposition Claims About Margaret Sanger,” an October 2004 “fact sheet” published by the Planned Parenthood Federation of America Inc.:

“Although Sanger uniformly repudiated the racist exploitation of eugenics principles, she agreed with the “progressives” of her day who favored

“• incentives for the voluntary hospitalization and/or sterilization of people with untreatable, disabling, hereditary conditions

“• the adoption and enforcement of stringent regulations to prevent the immigration of the diseased and “feebleminded” into the U.S.

“• placing so-called illiterates, paupers, unemployables, criminals, prostitutes, and dope-fiends on farms and open spaces as long as necessary for the strengthening and development of moral conduct

“Planned Parenthood Federation of America finds these views objectionable and outmoded. Nevertheless, anti-family planning activists continue to attack Sanger, who has been dead for nearly 40 years, because she is an easier target than the unassailable reputation of PPFA and the contemporary family planning movement. However, attempts to discredit the family planning movement because its early 20th-century founder was not a perfect model of early 21st-century values is like disavowing the Declaration of Independence because its author, Thomas Jefferson, bought and sold slaves.”

In truth she was a racist and Planned Parenthood continues the implications of her views today targeting Black communities with their abortion businesses.

And now that a large Planned Parenthood affiliate has decided to admit Sanger’s racialist eugenic views and distance itself from it:

Washington Free Beacon:

PolitiFact Silent After Planned Parenthood Repudiates Margaret Sanger’s Racism
Fact-checker branded Republicans liars for pointing to PP founder’s KKK ties

PolitiFact is not saying whether its “fact-check” claiming Planned Parenthood founder Margaret Sanger was not racist still holds up in light of the organization’s largest affiliate admitting Sanger had racist views.

The fact-check, published on Oct. 5, 2015, addressed a claim made by then-presidential candidate Ben Carson. Carson, now the HUD secretary, said, “Margaret Sanger was a eugenicist. She believed that people like me [black Americans] should be eliminated, or kept under control.”

PolitiFact called Carson’s claim “false.”

“While Sanger indeed supported the eugenics movement, substantial evidence shows that she was not racist and in fact worked closely with black leaders and health care professionals,” PolitiFact said. It said that Carson’s claim “bears no relation to historical reality.”

But Sanger’s problematic relationship to the eugenics movement is back in the spotlight after Planned Parenthood of Greater New York (PPGNY) renounced her this week, removing her name from a Manhattan clinic. PPGNY’s move was supported by the national organization.

Merle McGee, chief equity and engagement officer for PPGNY, told the New York Times, “The biggest concern with Margaret Sanger is her public support for the eugenics medical philosophy which was rooted in racism, ableism and classism.”

PolitiFact did not respond to requests for comment on updating the fact-check.

A fact sheet released by Planned Parenthood in 2016 acknowledged that Sanger made a speech about birth control at a Ku Klux Klan meeting in 1926.

“Sanger’s passion to spread and mainstream birth control led her to speak to any group interested in learning how to plan their reproduction. Planned Parenthood strongly disagrees with Sanger’s decision to address an organization that spreads hatred,” the sheet stated.

Sanger also endorsed the forced sterilization of disabled or untreatable people, as well as limiting immigration to prevent the influx of “feebleminded” people into the United States. These views aligned her with other progressives of the time.

The pro-life Susan B. Anthony List told the Washington Free Beacon that PolitiFact‘s stance reflects the media’s generally soft coverage of Planned Parenthood.

“PolitiFact is likely too stubborn to admit that they got it wrong, but what further proof do they need when Planned Parenthood itself is finally admitting their founder is a racist?” the group said. “The media gave Planned Parenthood a pass on this for decades, despite mounds and mounds of evidence to the contrary.”

Posted in UNCATEGORIZED | Comments Off on Only for appearances sake, Planned Parenthood distances itself from its racist founder

Today’s Quiz:

Today’s Quiz:

Who said, “Joe Biden is as good a man as God ever created”, and “the nicest person I think I’ve ever known in politics”.

Hmmm, I know it wasn’t me . . .

a. Catherine Eugenia Finnegan (Joe’s mother(?)
b. “Corn Pop”
c. Clarence Thomas
d. the ‘dirty, lyin’ pony soldier’
e. Lindsey Graham
f. Tara Reade

Answer:

Lindsey Graham; in an interview with the Huffington Post.

with friends like this:

Good ol’ Lindsey! Joe Biden is by no means the only person Lindsey is ‘high on’. There was, of course, John McCain. Graham wanted it to be known that he and ‘John’ were ‘best buddies’. Of course, Sen. McCain was no friend of Donald Trump and actively worked against his election…even abetting the use of the wholly discredited “Steele Dossier”. With McCain’s passing, Lindsey became a ‘great ally’ of President Trump.

Then, there was a news conference recently where Graham declared that he has “all the respect in the world for Dr. Fauci”. He also suggested that the Trump administration may be trying to “undermine him and (it’s) not going to be productive”. He also called it “a disgusting attempt to pass the buck”. (Lindsey does ‘gush’.)

Given all the Senator’s admiration for Biden, Fauci, and who knows, does anyone believe that, as Chair of the Senate Judiciary committee, Lindsey’s going to really “get to the bottom of” the Obama, Biden administration’s efforts to obstruct Trump’s election and undermine his administration.

Watch how often you see “Biden for president” commercials that highlight Republican Senator Lindsey Graham’s endorsement of the “man as good as God ever created”!!!     dlh

Posted in UNCATEGORIZED | Comments Off on Today’s Quiz:

“Mommy, those bad policemen squirted pepper spray at me.”

A SNL Skit that Backfires Big Time…Antifa and BLM Just Don’t get the Irony of ‘Bring Your Mommy to the Riot…Those “bad police” are not Being Nice to Us.”

Back when Saturday Night Live was funny (and yes, it really was, once), the show would have done a bit like this:

_ ‘Rough, Tough’ “protesters, yelling at law enforcement, throwing rocks and bottles at police, screaming in the faces of cops…really ‘tough’ people’, they thought of themselves.

– Then, as they threaten and begin to damage private property and government buildings, they are  “dispersed as humanely as possible in the face of dangerous violence…tear gas, pepper spray, rubber bullets, firehoses, etc

So, the ‘rough, tough’ people take it to the ‘next level’.

They go home and tell their Mommies what those ‘bad policemen’ did, and ask their Mommies to make those ‘bad people’ stop!

And, that’s where a SNL cast, attired in dresses and aprons come out chanting, “feds stay clear, mommies are here,’ leave our kids alone”!!!           dlh

Moms held signs saying ‘leave our kids alone’Credit: Reuters

PORTLAND protesters were protected by their moms who formed a human wall during a face-off with Trump’s federal officers.

The women, who were seen wearing bike helmets, demonstrated outside of a federal courthouse for a few hours, before officers used tear gas and flashed bangs to get them to leave the area, Buzzfeed reported.

Federal officers were sent into the city last week after clashes between police and protesters ensued.

Trump took to Twitter on Sunday to call protesters in Portland “anarchists” and defend his decision to deploy federal troops to the Oregon city.

“We are trying to help Portland, not hurt it,” the president wrote. “Their leadership has, for months, lost control of the anarchists and agitators.

“They are missing in action. We must protect Federal property, AND OUR PEOPLE. These were not merely protesters, these are the real deal!”

Federal officers were deployed into the city last week

Following Trump’s decision, Bev Barnum created a Facebook event called “Wall of Moms” which asked fellow parents to protect the protesters.

Barnum, a 35-year-old mom of two, wrote on the page: “Calling all moms. Let’s do what we do best- protect people.

“As most of you have read and seen on the news, protestors are being hurt (without cause). And as of late, protestors are being stripped of their rights by being placed in unmarked cars by unidentifiable law enforcement.

“We moms are often underestimated. But we’re stronger than we’re given credit for. So what do you say, will you stand with me? Will you help me create a wall of moms?”

The women, who were seen wearing bike helmets, demonstrated outside of a federal courthouse for a few hours, before officers used tear gas and flashed bangs to get them to leave the area, Buzzfeed reported.

Federal officers were sent into the city last week after clashes between police and protesters ensued.

Trump took to Twitter on Sunday to call protesters in Portland “anarchists” and defend his decision to deploy federal troops to the Oregon city.

“We are trying to help Portland, not hurt it,” the president wrote. “Their leadership has, for months, lost control of the anarchists and agitators.

“They are missing in action. We must protect Federal property, AND OUR PEOPLE. These were not merely protesters, these are the real deal!”

Barnum also encouraged her fellow women to be “prepared for the worst possible outcome- violence” and advised them to wear face masks, bicycle helmets and closed-toe shoes.

The ladies were also asked to “wear white to stand out from the crowd and to build a wall of protection for the protestors.”

Barnum told Buzzfeed that, following officers dispersing the group of protesters, some moms were treated for chemical irritants but none of them were arrested.

Posted in UNCATEGORIZED | Comments Off on “Mommy, those bad policemen squirted pepper spray at me.”