The Money, The Mules, The Machines

We have previously linked to and commented on exposés related to Zuckerberg/CTCL money scandal “The Money” and the illegal vote harvesting documentary 2000 Mules produced by True the Vote and Dinesh D’Souza “The Mules”. Now we are asking you to consider evidence to be presented in a documentary by  The Gateway Pundit  of their work investigating voting machine manipulations. Here are trailers related to the full presentation expected in mid August.

PREPARE YOURSELF: SELECTION CODE Movie on the 2020 Election Steal is DEVASTATING – Release Date August 20 (Trailer Attached)

The Gateway Pundit Published November 18, 2020 1,992,084 Views

Related reading:

Big Media Drops Garbage Report Promoting the Lie That There Was No Election Fraud in 2020 – Here Is Our Rebuttal

0

0

America is such a hellhole by Demoncrat lights why is it that tens of thousands of people on any given day are poised to rush the border to get in?   Is there something here they feel compelled to change . . . to protect us from . . .  or to exploit ?

If life here is so bad what with oppression, exploitation, racism, sexism, transphobia, guns running rampant, why don’t the Democrats leave for the Shangri-La of Cuba, Venezuela, China (which we rarely if ever hear them, criticize, rather apologize for)?

They could have universal health care – abortion on demand until birth (or traditional infanticide), never have to worry about their neighbor having a gun, never have religion supposedly foisted on them (other than the religion of the state), total media backup for political correctness, in loco parentis, freedom of sexual expression (well other than China, Cuba and Venezuela but exceptions prove the rule, or something). They can experience the freedoms and peacefulness of social scoring and of course cradle to grave  (however short the timeline if you are disfavored) economic security — highlighted by the wonderful abundant, just and equitable standard of living communism produces.

Why would anyone want to come to this racist, sexist, exploitative hellhole, (or live here and not pursue leaving)?  Are we not one world — silly borders should not be a roadblock to anywhere on earth,  but to the extent that they are, isn’t it logical for all to beat feet for the Shangra-La(s) out there as defined by the left America haters?  Those countries that are not sexist racist, exploitative hellholes.  And if it is important to stay and make improvements in one’s country then isn’t that generally true as an a priori principle, rather than abandon a country and less able countrymen to exploitation, war, destitution?  Why are America’s vociferous critics still here while they endorse reward open borders or illegal immigration?  It is actually quite clear.  They must hate America.

Related images and links

https://nypost.com/2022/07/02/arizona-dems-boost-anti-supreme-court-f-ck-the-fourth-rally/

https://www.breitbart.com/sports/2022/07/02/anthem-kneeler-megan-rapinoe-to-receive-presidential-medal-of-freedom/

0

0

AOC is such an ordinary Democrat — oblivious, fixated, ignorant, hateful . . .

In spite of the distracting all-too-programmed facial expressions, gestures, body bounces — good rhetoric still depends on the veracity of what you have to say.  On that fundamental basis AOC is such a shallow twit as evidenced in this take apart of a resent speech she gave regarding overturning Roe. It is from the site Not the Babylon Bee.

+1

0

“The Coach” loses one . . . but he and his are certainly certainly not out of the game

The Babylon Bee takes on the vapidity of sports commentators and the underpinnings of the abortion culture in one great piece.  Hat tip to Ted Cruz for promoting the insightful satire.

0

0

• Their minions are ignorant, delusional or evil fellow travelers i.e. Democrats

This will start a group of irregular posts /reposts commentaries of note regarding the Friday’s Dobbs decision overturning the Roe /Doe/ Casey jurisprudence.  We will endeavor to pick and link some of the best on point that we come across and of course welcome referrals from readers as well. Other subjects will of course be addressed. This one is from a Twitchy post.  The title is a bit optimistic as the proaborts are very imaginative.

Straight-FIRE thread absolutely SHREDS every single Lefty talking point about abortion and Roe

thereport.be/article

Straight-FIRE thread absolutely SHREDS every single Lefty talking point about abortion and Roe

twitchy.comJun 27, 2022, 03:00 PM

Once again we are proud to bring you a thread we don’t have to say much about. ‘Trader Jill’ does an exceptional job of debunking the Left’s talking points and narrative around abortion and Roe … not that they’ll take the time to read her thread and learn a thing or two from it.

But at least you can take this info with you, dear reader, and combat the stupid out there.

Take a gander.

Listen up you silly liberals, because here is the truth about SCOTUS overturning Roe V Wade:

1. No “most” Americans DO NOT support abortion up until the moment of birth – In fact it’s only 12% that do. 57% believe abortion should be banned as soon as a heartbeat is detected.

— 🚛TraderJill (Pronouns: Meme Queen/Your Highness) (@LadyJustice6910) June 27, 2022

They’re just absolutely uninformed about what overturning Roe really does.

And no, most Americans do not support abortion up to the moment of birth.

2) Less than 1% of all abortions are the result of rape and incest, so stop acting like it’s an epidemic.

3)Pro-life Christians are not the ones that brought this to SCOTUS, but rather an abortion clinic trying to overturn the states law banning it after 15 weeks. Oops!

— 🚛TraderJill (Pronouns: Meme Queen/Your Highness) (@LadyJustice6910) June 27, 2022

15 weeks was too LIMITING for an abortion clinic.

Think about that for a minute.

THEY started it.

4.Abortion is not a Constitutional right. There is no mechanism in the document to address it; thus, it always belonged at the state level, so the will of the people prevails as intended.

5. No state has any plans to outlaw it if the life of the mother is in jeopardy.

— 🚛TraderJill (Pronouns: Meme Queen/Your Highness) (@LadyJustice6910) June 27, 2022

Gosh, all of those little talking points are just getting nuked.

6. Justice Samuel Alito explicitly wrote that, “Nothing in this opinion should be understood to cast doubt on precedents that do not concern abortion,” such as contraception and gay marriage. Crisis actors are ginning up the crowd with lies to believe otherwise.

— 🚛TraderJill (Pronouns: Meme Queen/Your Highness) (@LadyJustice6910) June 27, 2022

Lots and lots of deflection and distractions out there. The ones insisting overturning Roe will keep women going through an ectopic pregnancy from getting care are some of the most obnoxious.

7. Pro-life people are not all religious. You don’t need to believe in God to believe in the sanctity of life. Yet another lie.

8. Your contraceptives are in no danger of being taken away, and the morning after pill, or Plan B is still widely available over the counter.

— 🚛TraderJill (Pronouns: Meme Queen/Your Highness) (@LadyJustice6910) June 27, 2022

Yeah, pro-aborts keep screeching about the Catholic Church when in reality, there are lots and lots and lots of people who are pro-life simply because they are humane.

9. There are over 16 different types of birth control, and most doctors will tell you to double up regardless of the 99% efficacy rate, just as a precaution.

10. STD’s are still a thing, so if you’re not getting your partner tested/using condoms, then you are at great risk.

— 🚛TraderJill (Pronouns: Meme Queen/Your Highness) (@LadyJustice6910) June 27, 2022

YOU are responsible for your reproduction, so let’s stop pretending you magically fall on the D against your will.

Teach your daughters how to be responsible, and stop looking at abortion as a method of birth control. “Safe, legal and RARE”, remember that trope? Yeah, me too.

— 🚛TraderJill (Pronouns: Meme Queen/Your Highness) (@LadyJustice6910) June 27, 2022

Amen amen and another amen.

And no, hater who might be reading this just to hate, we’re not being religious.

Ok, maybe a little. HALLELUJAH.

***

0

0

• • Vindication of 2020 is not to be passed over but is available through others as well 
  • Part two of Kurt Schlichter analysis —The Case Against Donald Trump 2024       
    

  OK — Trump and many conservatives can arguably contend that the “most electable” candidate is Trump. Certainly the turnout at Trump led rallies is impressive. Indeed they must be heady events for the guy on stage if he perceives the attendance and enthusiasm as personal adulation.

  Oh to be sure there is a lot of that and deservedly so directed at Trump.  But I look at the rallies as something more akin to a cause not a man and that is the reason for the attendance. I think most of those in attendance would agree, although Trumps rock star status is a huge draw. It needs to be internalized that MAGA is not about Trump and it is doomed to be a flash of American history if it is largely dependent on him or his personalty, rock star that it is.

  We in Iowa have to be more discerning than that.  We are first in the nation for the Republican caucus/primary system and discerning/comparing the leadership, policy  and communication traits of the contenders, starting now frankly, is an important contribution to the body politic.

  Why is it too much to expect a MAGA candidate to be bold in policy (radical as in returning to roots), to surround himself (herself) with good people, to take the fight to the enemy,  to be clever (as wise as the serpents), able to avoid unnecessary drama and animosity (humor is good in a Reaganesque mode), to lead with authority and articulation while making the effort always about America.

  Trump had a good track record and deserves great appreciation for doing what he said he would do. In one very important matter to a fault –  pushing an experimental vaccine.

  In spite of shortcomings one can point to instances of great merit in all of the categories but also serious predictable unnecessary problematic instances. Personnel judgement is a big one — being rather easily flattered, not knowing well enough people he brought in to key positions, not understanding the nature of the swamp.  Overdoing superficial friends and family. We can recognize Don Jr as a serious asset. Ivanka and Jarred not so much, and if he had to bring them in for some reason well that is an issue.

  Some might argue that Trump purposely created diversions with his “mean tweets” and necessarily used them to get around leftist media going directly and frequently to the people. One might examine the content with that in mind but there are diversions and then there are diversions. There are workarounds and then there are workarounds.

  Frankly I think a DeSantis is a better candidate going forward  from what I have seen in those categories and there are others as well — Cruz has largely redeemed himself with me (if I can forgive a flyer from Trump I can do so for him as well). More in coming posts.

0

0

• The thing is election 2024 for President should not be about Trump.  It should be about MAGA and Trump neither invented that sentiment nor does it depend on him. It can be argued he is a drag on it in some ways.
• But can the country as fifty united states, survive until then?
• A plausible but problematic or unlikely scenario to end the Biden residency ASAP after a sea-change in Congress via the 2022 midterms 

Writing at Townhall Kurt Schlichter’s column yesterday was the part one of his  analysis regarding who the GOP should nominate for the 2024 presidential race. He uses a pro and con analysis centered on Trump.  The first commentary was the pro-Trump one with the “not Trump” to follow Thursday.  We commend the article to you: The Case for Donald Trump 2024.   We also embellish it with this insightful video presentation by a Brit pointing to certain virtues of Trump.

The video commentary above is compelling. We would only offer that while Trump is a unique personality a conservative alternative who quickly demonstrates assertivness can produce the same reluctance in malcontents.

The parameters of my comments on this question include that it is likely that the Democrats will not be able to field a comparative strong candidate because Biden is making “Democrat” a bad name (it always was here at V’PAC).  That assumption on my part is important to the calculus of getting the best conservative able to achieve the most in one term to undo the damage the Biden residency is causing. The gist of  my contention is that Trump is not likely the only Republican able to beat a Democrat and indeed he might be the biggest problem should he win the nomination. That depends on women voters in the general a majority of whom still may be anybody but Trump, so give them that but one who shares MAGA policies.

Some might argue that Trump’s personality apart from his assertive MAGA policies which are at least quasi-populist, drives his support. Maybe for some, but I find much of it can be fatiguing and unnecessarily distracting.  All of us prefer his so called mean tweets to Democrat disastrous policies, actual culture rot and diminution of the country, but is that trip necessary, his way that is, when aggressive, clearer on point, in your face communications are possible from other politicians?  A major concern I have with Trump is that I do not think he has gotten his personnel picking problems solved, reflected in a number of his endorsement picks in the midterm primaries.  The extent of his serious mistakes in that regard resulted in much of the problems he faced.

Any alternative to Trump needs to support a rooted out federal bureaucracy and support a Justice Department that will prosecute identifiable election fraud of 2020. A new Republican House can take the lead in uncovering by hearings and pursuing prompt changes rectifying Democrat policy atrocities and installing preventatives for future congresses and administrations including proposing power limiting Constitutional Amendments as appropriate.  Electing Trump the third time in 2024 is not the only way to vindicate election 2020. Drama can be good — the inspirational effective/affective non-distracting kind.

0

0

Iowa Supreme Court says no right to abortion in state constitution, reversing its own 2018 decision

June 17, 2022

Dave Andrusko

By Dave Andrusko

In a 182 page opinion, the Iowa Supreme Court ruled this morning  “that the state’s constitution does not include a ‘fundamental right’ to abortion, reviving a law requiring women to wait 24 hours after an initial appointment before getting an abortion,” Reuters reported.

Writing the majority opinion, Justice Edward M. Mansfield said the previous ruling that established a constitutional right to an abortion “insufficiently recognizes that future human lives are at stake and we must disagree with the views of today’s dissent that ‘[t]he state does not have a legitimate interest in protecting potential life before viability’.”

In the 2018 ruling, written by Chief Justice Mark Cady and overturned by the Iowa Supreme Court today, the court said that “autonomy and dominion over one’s body go to the very heart of what it means to be free.”

In 2020 Iowa’s pro-life Gov. Kim Reynolds signed the 24-hour waiting period.  As the Iowa Supreme Court noted, “On June 23, 2020, before HF594 was actually signed into law, Planned Parenthood of the Heartland and its medical director, Dr. Jill Meadows, filed a petition in Johnson County District Court challenging the 24-hour waiting period.”

Justice Mansfield observed, in explaining why stare decisis principles don’t weigh heavily in favor of retaining the 2018 ruling,  that

PPH II [the 2018 decision] was overtly based on the notion of a “living” constitution…. To the extent PPH II viewed constitutional interpretation as an evolutionary process rather than a search for fixed meaning, it is hard now to argue that the evolutionary process had to end as soon as PPH II was decided. Does the Iowa Constitution get to “live” until 2018, at which point it must stop living?

For her part, Gov. Reynolds applauded the court’s decision.

“Today’s ruling is a significant victory in our fight to protect the unborn,” she said. “The Iowa Supreme Court reversed its earlier 2018 decision, which made Iowa the most abortion-friendly state in the country. Every life is sacred and should be protected, and as long as I’m governor that is exactly what I will do.”

The Iowa justices said they “are not blind to the fact that an important abortion case is now pending in the United States Supreme Court,” a reference to Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization.

“While we zealously guard our ability to interpret the Iowa Constitution independently of the Supreme Court’s interpretations of the Federal Constitution, the opinion (or opinions) in that case may provide insights that we are currently lacking,” today’s ruling said. “Hence, all we hold today is that the Iowa Constitution is not the source of a fundamental right to an abortion necessitating a strict scrutiny standard of review for regulations affecting that right.”

With today’s ruling, the waiting period case was returned to the district court.

0

0

Excuse me officer, we’re here as part of the “siege”

Check out these photos from the usual biased media sources used to illustrate their story about the felony conviction of two people parading in the halls of the Capitol on Jan.6, 2021.  Do you see what we see?

At the mostly peaceful and patriotic January 6 2021 rally for election integrity a small percentage of protestors regrettably did what a category of Democrats do all the time — made spectacles of themselves with some goofy and destructive antics — and maybe some even got pushy in response to some of the  police (other police may have been accommodating if not rather blase’ as in “another DC protest , different day, different group” and no more a serious threat even to the extent – “that would be down the hall to your right”.

The Jan. 6 protestors were not like another frequent category of leftist protestors who engage in widespread looting, extensive hateful damage  to property, who fire bomb and carry weapons going into houses of democracy aka protest sites.

According to the left, sauntering is besieging or something. By the way is that a guard under the portrait frozen in fear by the very presence of such a flag.

Nothing more was apparently on the agenda for even the most aggressive than has been attempted by countless leftist cause adherents protesting in the Capitol galleries or at other venues trying to disrupt proceedings at least for a time. Yes some arguably wanted to disrupt, but that is not insurrection – an armed takeover of government.  It is absurd to refer to those inside the Capitol and steps and walks that day as such. Most of the January 6 protestors who were arrested limited themselves to making noise on the steps or in the halls. Yet they have been subjected to gross violations of their rights. No one has been accused of bringing a gun or a bomb into the Capitol to shoot members of congress or bomb the place.  That is what insurrections do.

The only ones with definitive weapons in the Capitol that day were police, one of whom used his to kill an unarmed diminutive woman of no threat to him while he hazarded others in the line of fire. No other police with similar or closer vantage point felt any threat necessitating lethal force from that woman.  Although there were maybe the few cops who may have ganged up on another woman outside and beat her when she lay dying,  such an obvious threat presented.

One question, if it were a rainbow flag would there have been a felony conviction?

0

0

The first article Trump Needs to Alter His Message on COVID is sorely needed if he wants any enthusiasm from this quarter towards a primary run. Just stop it Donald — do you know who your base is really .  Your support at this stage is a lot of desperation in the face of Biden. As it stands now I hope DeSantis runs.  He is a good candidate and a better politician (in the good sense of the word).  I would go further than the article.  I think Trump needs to decry that he was mislead and that he endorses investigation into the unethical aspects to the whole tragedy/fiasco/scam and that he would make a lot of changes were h to be elected the third time.

The same advice in the article should be sent to Chuck Grassley by the way. Being a “me too” in support of the public health creeps endorsing the vaccine and masking is not a compelling message even if he is opposed to mandates (so is Trump). The admonition for the general public to take the jab as a great public health benefit (it is not) feeds the surreptitious control freaks and their methodologies in government and thesupposedly private sector. Advocate real vaccines and treatments rather than experimental problematic manipulations.

The second article They Are Not Sending Their Best is smack on.  There definitely needs to be a better evidenced understanding of American freedoms and their origin and purpose especially from the “elite” immigrants who apparently come here for the money more than anything. Their prescriptions will turn this country into the hell holes they left.  The common laborer sort of immigrant probably has a more authentic appreciation of American freedoms and rights than the elites mentioned in the article.

By the way — We will have some comments regarding the RPI State Convention Saturday after the finished platform and sources for insightful comments by attendees are checked.

0

0