Davenport: Who knew all these felons were really peace and justice warriors

My opinion from what has been revealed is that this area’s general curfew is an excessive unnecessary response and an assault on the civil liberties of everyone, black and white, The indications that the gunplay was tangential to the anti-racism protests was known but ignored.   More “do something even if it is wrong”

All eight arrested were felons AND known local bad-actors

Read it and weep, for true justice

Timeline of turmoil: All 8 arrested in Quad-Cities unrest, including police ambush, are local men 


The area shootings appear to be mostly opportunistic gang-banger bullshit — creating and using the cover of mayhem to loot a jewelry store or any target of opportunity.  I am thinking the gang-bangers shot each other and killed one of their own in a dispute.  One report indicated the female victim was a protestor and not connected to the gangs.  That would be a tragedy.

The officer(s) shot and shot at were very lucky and thank God for that.  Reports indicated bullets hit the headrests of the vehicle they were in.  My impression is that they were not targeted as part of some “days of rage scenario” but the felonious evil in the hearts of the perpetrators.  These were not peace and justice protest shootings.  The officers were shot investigating activity in a residential neighborhood apart from the larger protest gathering.

Read the story at the QC Times and let us know your opinion if my conjecture is likely or not.  There are other related reports about the protests Sunday that  we will comment on in a future post.

Timeline of turmoil: All 8 arrested in Quad-Cities unrest, including police ambush, are local men 

Posted in UNCATEGORIZED | Comments Off on Davenport: Who knew all these felons were really peace and justice warriors

RUSH’S ‘DIALOGUE’ A USELESS EXERCISE

RUSH MEETS WITH BREAKFAST CLUB; SEEMS TO PROVE ‘DIALOGUE A USELESS EXERCISE

Rush Limbaugh sat down Sunday with “The Breakfast Club’…a popular syndicated radio show featuring three hosts ‘of color’…Charlamagne tha God, Angela Yee, and D J Envy.

Rush’s purpose was apparently  to “dialogue” with the hosts regarding the George Floyd tragedy and to get the ‘Black perspective’ on this incident and the larger signifance it has for racial tensions in America.

From my perspective, the show was a disaster, ‘solving’ nothing, only emphasizing the hosts’ rather strange, and very rigid, view of the nation’s race relations.

To get quickly to the main point of the discussion as framed by the black host, Charlamagne, the only solution he seemed to offer to eliminate today’s racial tension in America is “to dismantle the mechanism of white supremacy” in America.

Charlamagne kept coming back to the theme of “white supremacy”, the “white power structure”; “dismantle” only solution! 

I thought that, rather disappointingly, Rush did not force Charlamagne to spell out what he means by “dismantling the ‘mechanism’ of white supremacy” on which the Breakfast Club host believes this nation was founded and which is built exclusively for the white population to the exclusion of African-Americans…to their aspirations and their ultimate personal successes.

He would repeatedly go back to all the slights, wrongs, the persecutions he has suffered, as he would claim every black person has suffered and/or is vulnerable to.

(One interesting exchange had to do with the proposition, “what if George Floyd had been white and the same thing happened to him”. Rush suggested, the nation probably would have heard or known little of it. It was unclear what Charlamagne contended. Had that been the case , the policeman would not have been charged immediately? would have been dealt with harshly …? Bottom line, the offending policeman would have been dealt with far differently than as in the Floyd case.)

Again, what is the “mechanism” that requires “dismantling”?!

Taken literally, the implications of Charlamagne’s proposal are very troubling. What part of the “mechanism” ensures that the country only exists for the white population?

In C’s mind, every bad thing, or misfortune, large or small, which befalls a black person in America is because of the “White Power Structure”…the “mechanism”. And, for “Tha God”, the “dismantling” is the only solution.

There was no mention of the case of the Minneapolis policeman Mohamed Noor who shot and killed Justine Damond, after she had called police about an intruder. Noor was a Somali immigrant, Damond was a white woman. Noor was convicted of 3rd degree murder and will be sentenced later this week. (Unlike some of the other cases often cited by  Charlamagne Ms. Damond was free of any suggestion of possible  guilt for anything when she was gunned down.)

The conversation also did not reference the fact that we have had a black president. Our governmental structure from local to national is ‘open to all’ regardless of color; representation at the federal level and much of the local levels equate to population percentages.

One might even argue that in some parts of the country, black and minority participation at all levels of the government even exceeds representation in the overall population.

It also seems that there is no acknowledgement of the many accomplished, successful blacks in every phase of American life: business, the arts, entertainment, sports, media, etc 

In listening to Charlamagne and his co-hosts it seemed clear to me that there is no ‘white supremacist’ or ‘white racist’ who is more rigid and unpersuadable of his position on such matters than Charlamagne himself. He brought up everything from Colin Kaepernick to other incidents involving police and black “victims’. Rush did not engage in any debate about the signifant differences in circumstances and actions on the part of police and “victims” as related to the Floyd case. (Michael Brown and Eric Garner come to mind…a protracted debate could relate to these cases but there would be nothing about them vis-a-vis the Floyd case persuading Charlamagne) 

The usefulness of such “dialogue” is entirely absent when, to every problem or issue his response is “dismantle the white supremacy structure”.

dlh

“The Breakfast Club”…a black group, Charlamagne Tha God, Angela Yee and DJ Envy

“dismantle the ‘mechanism’ of white supremacy”; Rush never asked what that means!

related reading:  here and here 

Posted in UNCATEGORIZED | Comments Off on RUSH’S ‘DIALOGUE’ A USELESS EXERCISE

Schilling and Miller-Meeks, Dependable vs High Maintenance (at best)

Ford vs Edsel (the grill was not all that inspiring)

Bobby Schilling  — unwavering on key issues; Right to Life, support for conservative Trump agenda, a proven performer on veterans issues, experienced, a good fit for the district,  not a panderer to Johnson County, shows tenacity as he recovers from health issue — already back in the game.

Mariannette Miller-Meeks —  her propensity to “misspeak” indicates not an instinctual conservative, campaign ads attack Schilling for what she is guilty of,  Republican establishment endorsements hardly inspiring  (note Trump and Grassley staying out), fourth attempt (self-financed nominations) might say something about her claims of grassroots appeal.


Miller-Meeks claims to be in the lead so let’s look at her cause celeb using the window into her soul of the post-card campaign she has run and the unsupportable statements:

We have received four during the course of the primary campaign all with her campaign consultant Victory Enterprises mailing indicia, that in itself is cause to be circumspect about what is said therein (see here and here).

In one she refers to herself as a “Pro-Life pioneer in the Iowa legislature.”  That is jaw-dropping BS, indefensible (she has been in the legislature not even two years, one real session) and an insult to the women in the legislature who have long supported the right to life. This from a candidate whose statements on the issue are so troubling, including indicating a propensity to vote for pro-life legislation in order to put it in the hands a what was then a pro-abortion Iowa Supreme Court. Her statements have been analyzed first here and later here.

Regarding Trump support

In two attack pieces Miller-Meeks falsely implies that Schilling does not have Trump’s back because of  a comment Schilling made in support of an independent special prosecutor to clear up the Russian collusion accusations against Trump.  It was incredible low-life dredging by her handlers to find something they could distort to do a number on Schilling. Of course Miller-Meeks does not mention that her own much touted endorser Lyndsey Graham championed the effort and it was supported by other proven Trump agenda supporters as a way to confidently get to the truth (the corruption of Mueller not anticipated). See here.

But who had Trump’s back during the accusation frenzy by Democrats about Trump’s fitness for office one month prior to the 2016 election – not Miller-Meeks —  see insert of Miller-Meeks Twitter comment :

Insufferably Miller-Meeks claims to be “the only reliable pro-Trump candidate for Congress”   With friends like her no wonder Trump has not endorsed her in the primary.

The truth about the reliability of Schilling is revealed in the ratings he received as a Congressman in a district dominated by the Democrat machine. – See ivoterguide or ballotpedia where you will see that the usual liberal suspects gave Bobby Schilling very low ratings on a wide range of issues and conservative groups rated him very highly. Miller-Meeks has no comparable performance appraisal.

As for leadership abilities we respect this endorsement for Bobby Schilling from three-time Silver Star for valor recipient, U.S. Special Forces Captain, combat wounded and career Secret Service veteran Bill Albracht ( a resident of Illinois during Schilling’s congressional term who also escaped the corruption of Illinois and now lives in Iowa’s Second Congressional District:

I have known Bobby Schilling since he ran for congress in the IL 17th District in 2010. He ran out of a strong sense of duty and with a patriotic calling to serve the people of Illinois. I helped on his campaign and was extremely happy with his service to the District during his two years in Congress. Several years ago, Bobby moved to Iowa to start a new chapter in his life. With his public service behind him, he focused on his family. Now, he has heard the call once again and he has answered. Our state and our country needs Bobby Schilling. We need his voice to represent our Iowa values and be our collective conscience in the Halls of Congress. I am a combat wounded, combat decorated Vietnam veteran. I have seen men function in the worst possible scenarios. I’ve seen men fail – I’ve seen men triumph. I have come to recognize the indicators and traits that define those that never quit and hold to the path of honor and truth. I believe now as I did in 2010 that Bobby is what we need and what our Nation needs now and as we go forward into this new decade. In my former career in federal law enforcement, we had a mantra that every agent strived to live by “worthy of trust and confidence”. This is Bobby Schilling and we are lucky to have him.

Bill Albracht – Bettendorf, IA

And just as a brief response to the silliness of the Miller-Meeks (Texas/California born and bred) intimation that Bobby Schilling is a carpetbagger, Schilling’s roots in the area are longer and deeper than Miller-Meeks by family and juxtaposition having represented virtually the same river valley, the same industrial base, the same agricultural base and many of the same people who crossed the river from Illinois to Iowa.


The election is tomorrow, June 2.  For information on polling locations and time see your county auditor website.

Posted in UNCATEGORIZED | 2 Comments

NYPD make their move after due warning to avoid being injured or killed

  • Perhaps the officers should have waited for the Molotov cocktails

I guess I watched a video of a different incident than the ‘objective journalists’ at the Daily Mail:

Two NYPD patrol cars RAM into a group of George Floyd protesters in Brooklyn after crowd surrounded them and started throwing plastic bottles and trash  

    • Several videos show two NYPD squad cars ramming into multiple protesters
    • The demonstrators were standing directly in front of the vehicles at the time
    • People can at first be seen throwing bottles and plastic cones at one of the cars
    • A second squad car arrives on scene and it runs into several people who struggle to get out of the way
    • The first cruiser then rams into a barricade that people are standing against

I MISSED THE “RAM” PART :

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9BziOZL-e5Q

I Saw One, Then A Second, Police Patrol Car surrounded and attacked by a mob throwing cans, bottles, and other potentially harmful projectiles at the occupants.

Then I saw the patrol cars INCHING forward to get out of the situation. As the cars INCHED forward, “protesters” threw themselves in front of the vehicles…some fell as the cars INCHED forward. Sirens and  lights blaring to get out of the way, a barricade was brought up by the thugs to keep the officers from getting away. Some “protesters” tried to crawl on the cars’ hoods.  That is an attack and the squad pushed the fence like a defensive line would do or a phalanx of officers. They were shoved out of the way as per riot control and self protection.  No one was run over. This was not any higher speed than officers thrusting on foot with their riot shields.

It seemed almost miraculous that none of of those idiots were injured. Had they been, the media and the various anarchist and nasty little ‘people’s’ groups would have hailed them as ‘courageous fighters for racial justice and potential martyrs’!!

I would have labeled them ignorant, smug,nasty little creeps who got what they so desperately asked for!     dlh

Posted in UNCATEGORIZED | Comments Off on NYPD make their move after due warning to avoid being injured or killed

Not rioting for justice – rioting for the loot

  • No justice under Democrat Mayor of  Minneapolis

We do not know the appropriateness of the allegations of egregiousness by a Minneapolis policeman’s physical handling of a criminal suspect.  This report at RedState provides the latest official information. Based on it we agree with the author that the extent of the charges against the officer “third degree murder” could be shot full of holes.  We would add that the information in the article relative to the restraint used does not indicate the actual amount of pressure used, but does indicate that the extent was not consistent with “a diagnosis of traumatic asphyxia or strangulation”. * In other words the placement of the knee might be without significant pressure and therefore not causal of the death.

What we do know is that there is no justification for the sort of rioting in a cause supposedly insisting on justice and rule of law.  For crying out loud the officer has been arrested and charged with Third Degree murder and other charges.  Other officers were summarily fired and may face charges.  They all deserve their day in court but we suspect a change of venue will be needed. The riot response is atrocious and is clear evidence that the participants are not interested in the rule of law.  Here are some memes and captioned photos on that aspect, courtesy HP Facebook pages.  See also our earlier post by  dlh.

*A second family ordered autopsy has also been performed and reports say it indicates asphyxiation but also confirms drug presence.

Posted in UNCATEGORIZED | Comments Off on Not rioting for justice – rioting for the loot

The mayor’s just ‘giving the rioters “some space” to “get it off their chest”.

  • In the meantime  the Twin Cities have the demeanor of the “twin cities” of Kabul and Baghdad (riot pics below)

To recall and paraphrase President Abraham Lincoln’s ‘request’ of General McClellan: President Trump of Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey:                                        “If Mayor Frey is not using his police department, I should like to borrow it for a while.”                   dlh

………………………………………………

Report by M Dowling
Mayor orders police to evacuate as rioters destroy 3rd precinct, 170 businesses 

Minneapolis police abandoned the Third Precinct in Minneapolis Thursday night after rioters and looters pillaged and burned for the third night in a row, using the death of George Floyd as an excuse. It was full-out mayhem with the precinct virtually destroyed. They also looted and destroyed 170 businesses, already hurting due to the lockdown.

More than 170 businesses damaged or looted. Dozens of fires. Thankfully, no reports of serious injuries. Calm on the horizon.

Democrat Mayor Jacob Frey told reporters that he made the decision “to evacuate the Third Precinct.”

“I made the decision to evacuate the Third Precinct,” Frey said. “The symbolism of a building cannot outweigh the importance of life, of our officers or the public. Brick and mortar is not as important as life.”

What does it say when the police can’t even protect themselves? It’s a weakness.
George Floyd’s death was a travesty, but that does not give rioters the right to burn down the city. These people are criminals.

To make it worse, vicious Al Sharpton is heading to Minneapolis to stir the pot. The media has been completely dishonest, except for Fox News. They are calling the rioters, ‘protesters.’ Ali Velshi on MSNBC falsely claimed this morning that the rioters are mostly peaceful as a building went up in flames behind him.

This is shameful. The police were kept from putting up any defense. Minneapolis looks like Kabul.

Posted in UNCATEGORIZED | Comments Off on The mayor’s just ‘giving the rioters “some space” to “get it off their chest”.

Interesting Times

There is an astonishing amount of compelling events happening such that just sifting through and bringing to your attention aspects is overwhelming.

The utter nonsense of the COVID 19 response — the bad science and science as god, the political corruptness, the madness of crowds,  federal, state local and stupid business decisions . . .

The biggest political scandal in US history — Russiagate

The vote by mail election fraud scheme by Democrats

China’s threats

Local election machinations

And so much more

Your submissions are always welcome to help keep people enlightened

V’PAC

Posted in UNCATEGORIZED | Comments Off on Interesting Times

When this one runs out, another virus please

Government answer to government imposed unemployment and business collapse

More money for no work, makes sense*

Businesses on the dole that could not compete

Some unions agitating for hazard pay**

Strangely the bandwagon antic was not entertained for exposure to “ordinary” flu seasons (but we can hear them tuning up)

I’m not familiar with Mr. Opelka, but apparently he is best known as a musical composer-lyricist. But I think if he decides to quit his day job, he’d be a pretty good journalist/columnist. (from the Wall Street Journal, 5/28/20)

This puts congressional lunacy in the proper context that I’ve seen not done any better. (And Nancy P. comes as close to a Marxist (of either type) as possible.)    dlh

Marxist Economic Policy—as in Groucho  
The unemployment bonus is straight out of ‘Animal Crackers.’

We’re all Marxists now. Not Karl, Groucho. There’s a famous sketch in “Animal Crackers” (1930) in which Groucho (as Captain Spaulding) quizzes Chico (Signor Emanuel Ravelli) on how much money the band gets paid. “What do you fellas get an hour?” Groucho asks. “For playing we get $10 an hour,” Chico replies.

Groucho presses: “I see. What do you get for not playing?” “For not playing we get $12 an hour. . . . Now for rehearsing, we make special rate. That’s $15 an hour.” Groucho: “That’s for rehearsing? And what do you get for not rehearsing?” Chico: “You couldn’t afford it. You see, if we don’t rehearse, we don’t play. And if we don’t play, that runs into money.”

Ninety years ago, a couple of vaudevillian cutups engaged in an exercise of Keynesian reductio ad absurdum which stands even today as a two-minute master class in fiscal restraint. It highlights a problem with the government’s response to the coronavirus crisis. Every member of Congress should be required to view this film. It wouldn’t hurt the president and Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell to do so too.

I have a musician friend, Jim. He plays the bass. Jim is a talented man, and his gigging takes many forms—studio recording as well as live performance. As has happened to so many, his entire livelihood dried up overnight in mid-March. After filing for unemployment relief, he was grateful to receive the bulk of his lost weekly income but equally surprised by the unexpected $600-a-week bonus.

Without auditioning for it, Jim has become an unofficial member of Signor Ravelli’s Animal Crackers orchestra. He recently complained, only half ironically, that he doesn’t know how he’ll make ends meet once he can work again. Suddenly, he’s singing the economic equivalent of St. Augustine’s famous prayer for redemption: “Please let me work again, Lord—just not yet.”

In the 1980s economist Arthur Laffer popularized the notion of an ideal, lower tax rate. If you tax something too much, the Laffer curve posits, you get less of it. In the government’s recent fiscal and monetary response to the pandemic, we have the inverse corollary, the Sloth curve. If you create incentives for unemployment, you get more of it.

If politicians continue to dole out largess at the current rate, my friend Jim will have his best year in a long time and, like Signor Ravelli’s band, he’ll have no incentive to go back to playing.


*pictures/captions not in original, unattributed in internet search

**Unions calling for hazard pay, here and here

Posted in UNCATEGORIZED | Comments Off on When this one runs out, another virus please

Steve King getting “the treatment” from the usual suspects

MORE LIKE MIGHTY JOE YOUNG

As a supporter of Steve King, I found this piece by Jack Cashill informative, and an accurate characterization of the congressman.

In my opinion, Rep. King has been “Palin-ized” by the Dems and, of course, the media, and, also, of course, his own Republican colleagues and even many ‘bona fide’  conservatives.

I have followed Mr. King, and have read some of the statements attributed to him which have been turned by the media into ‘racist’ or “sexist”, or whatever, terms.

In most every instance, the statements reflected King’s thoughtful analyses, and were not either in fact or intent, as characterized. Unfortunately, King has often expressed his thoughts in unfriendly forums or in terms which the media found easy to distort or mischaracterize…and, even easy to misinterpret for King’s own natural allies (Republicans and conservatives).

That is one thing about Democrats…they don’t turn on their own, even when the individual is and does express flagrantly racist or sexist, or greatly divisive sentiments (ie., the anti-semitic, anti-America Ilhan Omar is a striking example that comes to mind…Steve King lost his committee assignments; Omar was hailed as a Democrat “star”).        dlh

At The American Thinker:

The GOP’s Unholy Assault on Iowa’s Steve King

By Jack Cashill

The headline of a recent Baltimore Jewish Times article reads as follows: “Jewish Republicans Tackle a Thorny Question: What To Do About Republicans Like Steve King?”

A saner question might be, “Why should Jewish Republicans — or any Republican, for that matter — have a problem with Iowa congressman Steve King?”

 Certain Republican insiders, using The Republican Jewish Coalition as a wedge, are trying their damnedest to defeat King in a June 2 primary.  In doing so, they not only threaten to unseat one of Israel’s most solid defenders in Congress, but also risk creating a backlash against Jews.

Reporter Ron Kampeas acknowledges how GOP leadership is using the Republican Jewish Coalition.  Writes Kampeas, “The RJC [is] making a case that a Republican trafficking in anti-Semitism or white supremacism carries more weight than when it comes from an outside group.”  What makes this strategy all the more odious is that King has trafficked in neither.

In the spirit of full disclosure, I contracted with King in December to help him finish a book project he had been working on.  This article is not part of that contract.  It comes from the heart.

 In the course of the project, I have reviewed every single “controversial” comment that King has made during his eighteen years in Congress.  Having reviewed them all in their proper context, I would endorse King in a heartbeat and challenge any Republican who feels otherwise to a public debate on what it means to be a conservative.

 In the way of background, I have a Ph.D. from Purdue in American studies.  More to the point, I wrote a book five years ago called Scarlet Letters that documented the left’s use of race, sex, and other identifiers to subvert the right.

 As I noted in the book, “[a]n awkward phrase, a misunderstood joke, a manufactured quote, a frank look at data, a persistent belief in a revered tradition could earn a sinner any one of many scarlet letters as ablaze with ‘awe and horrible repugnance’ as Hester’s own Scarlet A.”

 King was felled by a manufactured quote.  The quote was published in a January 2019 New York Times article headlined “Before Trump, Steve King Set the Agenda for the Wall and Anti-Immigrant Politics.”  Deep in the article, reporter Trip Gabriel quoted King as saying, “White nationalist, white supremacist, Western civilization — how did that language become offensive?”

Gabriel did not tape the interview.  Neither did King.  In a later taped conversation, King’s assistant got Gabriel to admit he was the one who introduced the phrases “white nationalism” and “white supremacism,” but by that time, the tumbrils were rolling, and they have not stopped since.

 Five days after the initial article, Gabriel wrote an exhaustive piece headlined, “A Timeline of Steve King’s Racist Remarks and Divisive Actions.”  The article deserves an honored spot in a media time capsule showing just how thoroughly the Times had corrupted the language by 2019.

Gabriel documented King’s twenty-year history of alleged racist and divisive acts.  These included such offenses as King’s successful introduction of a bill making English Iowa’s official language, his assertion that “preventing babies being born is not medicine,” and his description of multiculturalism as “a tool for the Left to subdivide a culture and civilization into our own little ethnic enclaves and pit us against each other.”

The left’s strategy works only when Republicans join the witch hunt.  In King’s case, the witch-hunters know who they are.  I will mention only one by name: House Leader Kevin McCarthy.  Joe McCarthy never deserved the designation “McCarthyism.”  Kevin McCarthy does.

Curiously, in the lengthy Jewish Times article about King’s racism, reporter Kampeas does not attribute to King a single racist quote.  The best he can do is quote McCarthy saying, “Congressman King’s comments cannot be exonerated.”  This raises the question, “which comments?”

In his outspoken 18 years in Congress, King has never said anything as quotable as “If you have a problem figuring out whether you’re for me or Trump, then you ain’t black.”  He never said about Jews, “It’s all about the Benjamins.”  He did not even say, “Why don’t they go back and help fix the totally broken and crime-infested places from which they came?”

The last of those quotes came from a tweet by President Trump.  It was far more provocative than anything King has ever said.  To his credit, McCarthy refused to denounce Trump when asked to do so at a press conference.

As a result, the hashtag “KevinMcCarthyIsARacist” promptly trended on Twitter.  Weak-kneed Republicans like McCarthy live in fear of such labels.  To appease the left, they routinely serve up the occasional sacrificial lamb — a Todd Akin, a Richard Mourdock, a Steve King — forgetting that the left is never appeased.

 Despite the lack of quotes in the Jewish Times article, King is entirely quotable.  I have found King to be more thoughtful in his defense of Western civilization than most Republicans and more candid than just about all of them.  Some relevant quotes:

On Israel

CNN, November 2018:  “I am a person who has stood with Israel from the beginning, and the length of that nation is the length of my life.  And I’ve been with them all along.”

On White Supremacy and White Nationalism

House Floor, January 2019: “I reject those labels and the evil ideology that they define.  Further, I condemn anyone that supports this evil and bigoted ideology which saw in its ultimate expression the systematic murder of 6 million innocent Jewish lives.”

On Judeo-Christianity:

 House Floor, February 2012: “We derive our strength from free enterprise capitalism, Judeo-Christianity, Western civilization.  That is the core of America, the vigor of America, and that is what we must continue to protect, regrow, and refurbish.”

In the wake of Gabriel’s article, Mark Steyn took up King’s cause while hosting the Rush Limbaugh show.  “He’s not a white supremacist.  He’s not a white nationalist.  It’s all stupid talk,” said Steyn.  “So you’ve just surrendered the phrase ‘Western civilization.’  I don’t get that.  I don’t see what’s in it for conservatism in surrendering that phrase, in accepting the leftist’s view that the term ‘Western civilization’ is beyond the pale.”

 I don’t get it, either.

 Jack Cashill’s newest book, Unmasking Obama, is available for pre-order at Amazon.

Posted in UNCATEGORIZED | 1 Comment

In spite of his bluster Chris Wallace not up to taking on Kayleigh

At RedState Sister Toldjah writing:

Boom: Kayleigh McEnany Dropkicks Chris Wallace Over Suggestion That Journalists Shouldn’t Be Questioned

Yesterday, my RedState colleague Bonchie wrote about how Fox News anchor Chris Wallace and former National Review editor Jonah Goldberg bashed White House press secretary Kayleigh McEnany Sunday for not only asking journalists at the Friday press briefing about their lack of curiosity over Gen. Michael Flynn’s unmasking, but for also pointing out that it seemed like they didn’t want churches to reopen.

McEnany’s turning the tables on the notoriously combative, left-wing White House press corps earned her a “Twitter troll” designation by Goldberg, who stated that he believed her behavior was “indefensible and grotesque.” Wallace teed up the segment by suggesting that if McEnany “had told” him and former ABC News journalist Sam Donaldson “what questions” they should have asked during a briefing, that it “would not have gone well.”

Their criticisms were absurd for many reasons, as Bonchie explained well in his post, but McEnany herself was asked about them during a Fox and Friends interview this morning, and she did not hold back:

“No I never questioned the religious beliefs of the press,” McEnany responded. “Many of our journalists are great men and women of faith and differing faiths, whether it be the Jewish, Christian faith, the Muslim faith. What I was saying is, I was asked 11 questions as to why churches would be allowed to reopen. It was a bit peculiar to be asked these 11 questions in a row and for the onus and the focus solely to be on why churches are essential, I’ve never been asked why a liquor store was essential so I was merely pointing that out.”
[…]
“Journalists are not above being questioned themselves,” she said. “Journalism is a great and noble profession but there’s been a dearth of journalists asking the real questions for President Obama, the criminal leak of Michael Flynn’s identity, who leaked that identity, the dossier used to launch a three year investigation into this president to spy on his campaign why aren’t those questions being asked?”
“It’s journalistic malpractice not to ask those questions,” McEnany concluded.

Watch McEnany respond to co-host Brian Kilmeade’s question below:

What seems to be most at issue here for Wallace, Goldberg, and CNN types like “fact checker” Daniel Dale is that McEnany actually comes to White House press briefings prepared for battle, and gives as good as she gets. Apparently they – especially Goldberg, who specifically stated she wasn’t doing her job – don’t understand that it’s part of the job of a press secretary to be able to combat narratives journalists cook up that sometimes don’t match up with what’s actually happening.

Not only that, but as the “middle man” between the White House and journalists, press secretaries are well within their bounds to ask the media why they aren’t asking questions the White House thinks are worth looking into. This has been the case for decades. McEnany isn’t the only press secretary to have done this and she won’t be the last.

But because she’s so good at it, and because she’s caused so many in the WH press corps to clutch pearls, Goldberg and Wallace saw fit to white knight for them by way of demonstrating that they, too, believe questioning journalists is beyond the pale, which says a lot more about Goldberg and Wallace than it does about McEnany – and not in a good way.

Posted in UNCATEGORIZED | Comments Off on In spite of his bluster Chris Wallace not up to taking on Kayleigh