We are the drain the swamp people

• The swamp protects its own, this is family
• The truth does not matter, they believe they can deny, impede  and overwhelm with impunity.
• Works for Democrats, works for the deep state
• Pardon our cynicism, you go right ahead and give Barr and company all the benefit of the doubt

‘Smoking Gun Email’ Shows Joe Biden Did Meet with Son Hunter’s Ukraine Partners 

From reader response to Post’s revelations reported in Breitbart:

Honestly, this will amount to nothing as there is already mountains of evidence with everyone (except for the Ukrainian judicial system) looking the other way, including Barr. The crooks are openly giving all of us the finger….

————–

The Republic is over if one side is above the law and never gets charged while on the other side like Flynn they’re not even allowed to drop false charges… Somebody seems to be pushing us into a fight…

—————

The Biden Family = White Privileged, criminal’s,

Big Tech is busy trying to keep a lid on it. But even if the “justice” system finds doing something is unavoidable (big Tech will handle the political fall out) the wrongdoing will be discounted, slow-walked, fumbled, dissipated, ended prematurely.

They have the power

We have seen it

US Quietly Ends Probe of Obama-Era ‘Unmasking’ of Trump Allies: Sources 

We suppose there is a small chance it is wishful thinking by Reuters.

The only justice will be repudiation at the polls and then supporting Trump  to apply the energy to dismantle the protections the system enjoys

Trump: It Is ‘Too Early’ To Tell if I Would Keep Barr as Attorney General in a Potential Second Term

During an interview with Newsmax’s Greg Kelly set to air on Wednesday night, Trump was asked if he would keep Attorney General William Barr in if he won a second a term.

“I have no comment. Can’t comment,” Trump responded. “It’s too early.”

“I’m not happy with all of the evidence I have. I can tell you that. I’m not happy,” he added.

The Washingtonton Post reported on Tuesday that U.S. Attorney John Bash, who was appointed by Barr to look into allegations that officials in the Obama administration inappropriately requested the identities of individuals whose names were redacted in intelligence documents, concluded his investigation without filing charges.

“Personally, I think it’s ridiculous. It’s ridiculous. It’s a disgrace,” Trump said of the news, adding, “I think it’s really a horrible thing that they’re allowed to get away — when they say no indictments, they actually said no indictments before the election.”

He continued, “I had to go through elections with all those clouds over my head. But they don’t because the Republicans are so nice. Personally, I think it’s too bad. I think it’s too bad. They’re guilty as hell.”

Make up a pretext, use it to spy, use it for political unmasking, defraud a court, destroy peoples lives: no foul .     VPac

0

0

• Has the “Prince of Peace” Been Scammed, or, is He a Willing Admirer of Communism, or Both…? 
• Be a good Christian means you kowtow to the state??

Vatican under fire for moving to renew deal with the Chinese Communist Party   Vatican said to be moving forward with cutting deal with Beijing over appointment of bishops

“The first agreement, signed in 2018, was intended to be experimental, but its results have been grim. In the past two years alone, the Chinese government has raided church services, imprisoned non-compliant priests and removed crosses from churches…”

“In one case just weeks ago, according to the National Review, a government-issued high school textbook changed a Bible story “to turn one of Jesus’s key teachings on its head: After inducing others not to cast stones at a woman who has sinned, Jesus himself stones her.”

“The current deal gives the Vatican an official presence in the country through registered churches…(but), allows China say in appointing Communist sympathizers as bishops and permits surveillance-state technology to monitor who attends services.”

Full report here.

dlh

0

0

In yesterday’s posts dlh scoffed at the summation put forth by so many commentators (we are uncommontators) that SCOTUS will be 6-3 conservative assuming Justice Barret is confirmed.  One need only refer to coincidental information released later in the day to question the other commentators presumptions. From LifeSiteNews.com:

Supreme Court refuses to consider letting states cut Planned Parenthood out of Medicaid  There is no indication of where individual justices fell on the question.

Four justices are sufficient to grant a writ of certiorari, however, indicating that while Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito likely agreed to hear the case, only one of the other “conservative” justices – John Roberts, Neil Gorsuch, and Brett Kavanaugh – did the same.

Abortion advocates insist that tax dollars to abortion-involved facilities for other purposes don’t support abortions, but pro-lifers warn that such subsidies ultimately enable abortion groups to commit more abortions by freeing up money from their other revenue services. Duke University healthcare analyst Chris Conover estimated in 2015 that taxpayers ultimately cover almost 25 percent of all abortion costs.

The legal reasoning behind the court’s refusal to engage this must be that we must give tax dollars to the Ku Klux Klan’s community security endeavors with perhaps the restriction that they keep their rope budget separate (as long as the separation is not too onerous for them).

0

0

David Nabarro The World Health Organization’s special envoy on COVID-19

Dr. Fauci’s Mind-Numbingly Stupid Remarks About COVID Deaths

Mike Vespa at Townhalll castigates Anthony Fauci in the link above.  An article here at V’PAC last week fleshed our some of the reasons why Fauci’s remarks may be more manipulative than simply stupid.  But he is now undercut by WHO which reported this week:

WHO Official Urges Halt to Lockdowns as Primary CCP Virus Control Method 

Why –  because it does more harm than good,  it kills more than it cures, the cure causes deaths that underpin the “excess deaths” that are statistically misleading. Fauci corrupts the numbers..

0

0

Find it interesting that both progressive and conservative media insist on reporting that if Barrett confirmed SCOTUS will be 6-3 Conservative! Absurd!

With ACB Court will be 5-4, if that. Roberts is certainly no conservative… at least not when it counts.      dlh

0

0

What else can we say about the Pope and his hypocrisy about civil authority and wearing masks

• Fine for thee not for me?
• When in Rome . . . don’t do as the Romans are required to do?
• Has he been pranking us all along?

Below is a collection of pictures of Pope Francis from recent weeks, certainly long after mask wearing became all the rage. We note his, shall we say, lack of compliance. To be sure many of his enthusiastic devotees do not seem to take it seriously or comply in the most useless of ways, but so it goes.  It made us wonder if Scott County infectious disease health authority Dr Louis Katz would have the Pope arrested for an assault on his  person were he to be approached by the Pope as so many in the pictures have been?

Breitbart and Daily Mail and other photos of the “killer Pope” *

Vatican City State makes masks compulsory outdoors

Pope Francis was photographed wearing a face covering for the first time when he arrived for his general audience Sept. 9. But he took the mask off as soon as he stepped outside the car that dropped him off.

* Here is a video of Dr Katz  referred to above and an excerpt of his testimony to Scott County Supervisors July 8th. Quoting him”as far as I’m concerned failure to wear a mask is assault (where social distancing is difficult)”   We also note that the infectious disease mask expert touched his mask eight times in this short video.

0

0

However one might feel about George Neumayer, this column is accurate in every detail; are Catholics paying attention? Bold our emphasis for the main points.

POPE FRANCIS AND BIDEN IDEOLOGICAL BROTHERS

In courting Catholic voters, Joe Biden never fails to mention his friendliness with Pope Francis. He boasts that he knows him “as well as anybody” and that they share the same spin on “social justice.” “We need to create a culture which, as Pope Francis reminds us, cannot just be based on the worship of money,” Biden has said. “We cannot accept a nation in which billionaires compete as to the size of their super-yachts.”

Biden’s ruminations on wealth haven’t stopped him from chasing it. He is now a multimillionaire. As his bank account expands, so do his thoughts on the dangers of “income inequity.” His tax policy is straightforwardly socialist, based not on the legitimate needs of government but on wealth redistribution: “And the fact of the matter is, there is plenty — plenty! — of money to go around.”

In Pope Francis, whose musings run along the same course, Biden finds an ideological ally. Indeed, the pope’s latest encyclical on fraternity, Fratelli Tutti, reads like one of Biden’s campaign speeches. Published on the eve of the American election, the encyclical is a compendium of the pope’s greatest liberal hits: climate change alarmism, calls for open borders, opposition to the death penalty and even life sentences, the promotion of “international institutions” and pacifism, the demotion of “populism” and any notion of “just war,” and plenty of capitalism bashing and religious relativism. All of it should set Biden’s heart aflutter.PThe pope’s reduction of Catholicism to liberal politics with a dash of holy water on top gives Biden an out whenever his baldly anti-Catholic positions come under scrutiny. He can portray himself as a “Pope Francis Catholic” whose disagreements with Church teaching are mere trifles. Unlike Obama and Hillary Clinton, who supported the death penalty, Biden opposes it and holds up that opposition as proof of his Catholicism. In truth, it derives from his liberalism and his need to pander to the ACLU left.

Should he win, he will preside over the most anti-Catholic presidency ever. Picking up where Obama left off, he will resume harassment of the Little Sisters of the Poor, force Christians to pay for the contraceptives and abortions of their employees, court-martial orthodox chaplains, and generally use the power of the federal government to discriminate against anyone who objects to the immoral positions of the Democratic Party. One would think this looming showdown might concern the pope. But it doesn’t. The bishops most aligned with him have rationalized support for Biden, saying the “single issue” of abortion shouldn’t determine Catholic votes. Cardinal Joseph Tobin of Newark, an intimate of Pope Francis, has indicated that he plans to vote for Biden.

Treating friends as enemies and enemies as friends is one of the hallmarks of Francis Church, which shunned Trump even as he recovered religious freedom for Catholics. Biden, if he wins, will suffer no such shunning, even as he crushes their liberty.

From faithless bishops come faithless pols, who find common cause not only in the promotion of leftism but also in the persecution of the orthodox. Just as Biden calls Catholic opponents of the LGBTQ agenda the “dregs of society,” so Pope Francis dismisses them as “rigid.” Just as Biden endorses China’s repressive population control policies — he “fully understands” them — so the pope tells Catholics not to procreate “like rabbits.”

In persecuting the orthodox, Biden will do the liberal bishops work for them, targeting the very Catholics they find deplorable too. What do they care if he re-imposes Obama’s contraceptive mandate? They don’t support the Church’s teaching on contraception anyways. We may hear a few quibbles from them on abortion, but they will sound faint next to their excitement over Biden’s green new deal, open borders, and redistributionism.

Corks of champagne will pop in Vatican offices if Biden wins. Recall the cozy relationship between Obama’s White House and Francis’ Vatican. Together they snowed Catholics by treating political issues as religious and religious issues as political. Gina McCarthy, Obama’s head of the Environmental Protection Agency, received red-carpet treatment at the Vatican. While Vatican officials gave her a tour of the Holy See’s solar panels and the Sistine Chapel’s air filtration system, she burbled about the pope’s power to “de-politicize” climate change activism: “Everybody is just looking for the pope to continue to make signals that this is an issue that is important to the Catholic Church and should be important to all of us.”

Gird yourself for similar charades under a Biden administration. From the same secularists who renounce “religion in politics” will come praise of a pope who inserts liberal politics into religion.

0

0

People Do Not Have The Right To Know What I Would Do As President!…really?

Two scenarios:

One actually happened, the other didn’t. The one that happened received no criticism from the liberal media; the other, which didn’t happen likely would have created a media firestorm and negative reaction to it and the person who was posed to have said it would have dominated news coverage until election day.

Can you guess which was which?

Reporter: “President Trump, if you are reelected and the Barr-Durham investigation reveals that former President Obama was responsible for it and the undermining of your presidency, will you seek to have President Obama prosecuted?”

“Well, that’s a great question and I know why you asked it. But if I answered that question that’s all the news media would talk about.”

“Well Mr. President, don’t the people have a right to know?”

No. They don’t!, Trump answered.
——-

Reporter: “Sir, I’ve got to ask you about packing the courts and I know you said yesterday you aren’t going to answer the question until after the election, but this is the number one thing that I’ve been asking about from viewers in the past couple of days,”

“Well, you’ve been asked by the viewers who are probably Republicans who don’t want me continuing to talk about what they’re doing to the court right now,” Biden responded.

“Well sir, don’t the voters deserve to know—” the reporter pressed.

“No, they don’t,” Biden responded.

dlh

0

0

• Watergate was the comparative Keystone Cops stuff of underlings
• Nixon didn’t know
• Obama and Biden knew
• The when , the where, the why and most of the who are known
• If Barr is not going to step up to the bar he should be “Dis-Barred” of this responsibility

The crimes of Obamagate (Russian hoax) were for the purpose of lying to and defrauding the people of the truth in order to stop Trump or handicap his administration. The actions of the deep-state  — Hillary — Obama — Biden was a fraud against the people which is properly termed a political crime. It certainly injured the candidate Trump and his supporters. Elements of the crime and conspiracy are known and actionable now. There is no need to wait for the full panoply of crime and conspiracy rabbit holes anymore than insisting that all the elements of organized crime or other illegal syndicates must be unraveled prior to indictments.

Understandable perhaps that we would call attention to our own prescience, but we feel that it is worthwhile to note that possibly where we are today on the verge of the most important election in US history, was pretty much predicted in May of 2019 by us when, at that time, there were no pundits or political reporters who appeared to be ‘yet onto the game’.

Our skepticism in Barr ‘consulting’ with the three stooges
Anyone else skeptical – you read it here first Trump Gives Barr Authority to Declassify Information About Russia Probe’s Origins The order comes as Trump tells his own team not to comply with multiple probes focused on him “Mr. Barr in his review is working closely with Central Intelligence Agency…
May 24, 2019

Similar post:

Is This The “Game Changer”?
Don’t Get Your Hopes Up…

New Information on Why Durham Report Won’t Be Released Before Election Day

“U.S. Attorney John Durham reportedly will not release a report on the findings of his criminal investigation into the origins of the FBI’s counterintelligence into the Trump campaign in 2016.”

Is this bullshit, or what?

I may have so indicated before, but I have lost complete confidence in Bill Barr.

I had been impressed by his intelligence, his apparent commitment, his apparent courage…but I’ve become convinced the “apparent”s are totally misleading and the “intelligent” part may not be true either.

He came into the job proclaiming that the wrongdoing associated with the “Russia investigation” was obvious, and the ensuing attempt to overturn the election and undermine the Trump administration were also more than just suspicious.

And, by damn, he was going to get to the bottom of it…and “damn the torpedoes”!

And to demonstrate his commitment and courage, he appointed the ‘greatest investigator in the civilized world’ to prove it and insure that ‘justice was done’! Yessir!

AG Barr was unphased at Democrat attempts to keep him from making known to the American people how bad and how high in the US government the crimes and wrongdoing reached:

“Democrat Rep. Debbie Mucarsel-Powell (FL) tried to pressure Barr during a congressional hearing in July to commit to not releasing any results from the Durham investigation before the election, which Barr refused to do.”

The rest is about to become history. The “intelligent” Barr seems oblivious to the obvious facts that include:

1) If all of the criminal, treasonous actions of former President Obama and VP Biden (of which evidence without question exists), if properly revealed and reported to the American people prior to the election, would indeed persuade the electorate that no Democrat should get near the exclusive levers of governmental power in 2017, and Joe Biden is more worthy of imprisonment than inauguration!

2) If not revealed and, consequently, Donald Trump is not reelected, there is no reasonably informed person in the world who does not believe that the results of Barr’s “investigation”, if any, would never be seen! (Is Mr. Barr among those “not reasonably informed”? or is he “not intelligent” as he seemed?, or, is he just a fraudulent Deep State stooge who fooled us all, for awhile?)

Put me down as disgusted with Barr as the President is!            dlh

Systemically disgusted…. More from the latest notifications about the investigation

“Attorney General Bill Barr has begun telling top Republicans that the Justice Department’s sweeping review into the origins of the Russia investigation will not be released before the election,” Axios reported. “Barr has made clear that they should not expect any further indictments or a comprehensive report before Nov. 3.”

Barr is reportedly telling officials that Durham is taking the investigation “extremely seriously” and is focused on winning criminal prosecutions.

“According to one of the sources briefed on the conversations Barr said Durham is working in a deliberate and calculated fashion, and they need to be patient,” Axios continued. “The general sense of the talks, the source says, is that Durham is not preoccupied with completing his probe by a certain deadline for political purposes.”

President Donald Trump has increasingly become frustrated with the pace of the investigation, which has been hampered by the pandemic.

Democrat Rep. Debbie Mucarsel-Powell (FL) tried to pressure Barr during a congressional hearing in July to commit to not releasing any results from the Durham investigation before the election, which Barr refused to do.

0

0

TN forwarded this Twitter commentary from the people at Conservative Treehouse / Last Refuge.  Our brief comment follows.

Conservative Tree House  has helpfully dug into/exposed/highlighted much regarding the  deep state conspiracy to get/undermine/replace Trump. Comments to their post run the gamot of support disappointment and worse toward Barr and the system. Barr may be up against intricacies that (without more information) we cannot fathom. Nevertheless we hope and pray that he fully realizes he has nothing to lose, that the full truth is important, and that there have been courageous people before him to take inspiration from.

0

0